Democratic Lawmakers Denounce Suggestion of Registry for Muslims

WASHINGTON — Top Democratic lawmakers and rights bodies have slammed President-elect Donald Trump’s reported plan to reinstate a database of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries.

The National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) is a post-9/11 program which required travelers to the U.S. from specified Muslim-majority countries to immediately register with the federal government or face deportation.

“Reinstating failed programs that target Arabs and Muslims in our country is exactly what ISIS was cheering on election night when America, a beacon of freedom in the world, gives in to fear and begins chipping away at civil rights, our enemies are emboldened and their ranks swell with new recruits,” Senator Dick Durbin said.

“Back in 2002, I called for this program to be terminated because there were serious doubts it would help combat terrorism. Terrorism experts have since concluded that this program wasted precious homeland security funds and alienated Arab- and Muslim-Americans. Failed programs like this are the exact wrong approach to combating terrorism, and I will fight to ensure it never returns,” Durbin said.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairs Raul M. Grijalva and Keith Ellison, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus chairwoman Judy Chu, CPC vice chair Congressman Mike Honda, and CPC vice chair Mark Takano slammed Trump surrogate Carl Higbie for suggesting that Japanese-American internment camps could serve as a precedent for the creation of a Muslim registry.

“These remarks are beyond disturbing. This is fear, not courage. This is hate, not policy,” Honda said.

“Since Trump was elected president, thousands of Americans have voiced fears over what our country might look like in the coming years. Last night, one of his surrogates showed us why so many people are afraid of a Trump administration.

“The fact that our incoming president has considered internment as a model for how to move forward with the Muslim community is absolutely shocking. We cannot allow it to be normalized or enacted,” Ellison said.

The South Asian Bar Association, which represents Indian American and other South Asian lawyers, has also denounced the suggestions of a registry for non-citizen Muslims in the U.S.

“While once just a campaign promise, this xenophobic and un-American idea has been thrust back into our national consciousness by Carl Higbie, former spokesperson for a Super PAC supporting the president-elect,” SABA said in a statement.

Higbie’s suggestion that internment camps that imprisoned countless Japanese-Americans during World War II is a “precedent” for a possible Muslim registry, presupposes the lawfulness of a program that’s only lasting impact is that of shame, regret and embarrassment, it said.

SABA said this proposed registry is rooted in NSEERS that required certain “foreign citizens and nationals” to continuously check in with U.S. authorities.

After repeated criticism and documented ineffectiveness, NSEERS was abandoned in 2011, leaving a legacy of deporting individuals who had committed no crimes and had no links to terrorism, it said.

SABA called on Americans of all backgrounds to reject the notion that registration and potential mass incarceration of residents of this country solely based upon nationality, race or religion, without justification, cause or purpose is acceptable.

“Discrimination towards any community cannot be condoned and we hope the president-elect and the pending administration uniformly reject such proposals. The perpetuation of hate solely serves to continue the divisiveness that tears at the core of our values of equal protection and freedom for all individuals,” it added.