Tag: 2016 US Presidential Campaign & Election

  • Hillary Clinton turns up heat on Sanders in sharp first Democratic presidential debate

    Hillary Clinton turns up heat on Sanders in sharp first Democratic presidential debate

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Hillary Rodham Clinton, seeking to halt the momentum of her insurgent challenger, Sen Bernie Sanders of Vermont, aggressively questioned his values, positions and voting history on Tuesday night in the first Democratic presidential debate, turning a showdown that had been expected to scrutinize her character into a forceful critique of his record.

    In a series of sometimes biting exchanges, Clinton declared that Sanders was mistaken in his handling of crucial votes on gun control and misguided in his grasp of the essentialness of capitalism to the American identity. Mocking Sanders’ admiration for the health care system of Denmark, she interrupted a moderator to offer a stinging assessment of his logic, suggesting he was unprepared to grapple with the realities of governing a superpower.

    “We are not Denmark,” Clinton said, adding, “We are the United States of America.”

    The crowd erupted in applause.

    A few moments later, Clinton took aim at what may be Sanders’ greatest vulnerability with the Democratic left, asking why he had voted to shield gun-makers and dealers from liability lawsuits. Sanders, who linked his record on gun control to his representation of a rural state, called the bill “large and complicated.”

    “I was in the Senate at the same time,” Clinton replied. “It wasn’t that complicated to me. It was pretty straightforward.”

    Asked if Sanders had been tough enough on guns during nearly a decade in the Senate, Clinton offered a sharp reply: “No, not at all.”

    “I think that we have to look at the fact that we lose 90 people a day from gun violence,” she said. “This has gone on too long, and it’s time the entire country stood up against the NRA.”

    It was a dominant performance that showcased Clinton’s political arsenal: a long record of appearances in presidential debates, intense and diligent preparation, and a nimbleness and humor largely lacking in her male counterparts. She let no opportunity pass her by. When Sanders described the conflict in Syria as “a quagmire within a quagmire” but said he did not support sending U.S. ground troops there, Clinton interjected energetically: “Nobody does. Nobody does, Senator Sanders.”

    For Sanders, the gathering in Las Vegas provided an evening of unexpectedly forceful challenges, both from Clinton and from the moderator, Anderson Cooper of CNN. At times, he seemed somewhat exasperated and unsure about how to match Clinton’s agility. A memorable moment came when he sought to shield Clinton from criticism of her email practices.

    “Let me say something that may not be great politics,” he said. “But I think the secretary is right, and that is that the American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails.”

    Clinton flashed a wide smile and shook her rival’s hand. “Thank you,” she said, setting off huge applause in the auditorium.

    Sanders regained his footing when the debate turned to one of his signature issues: Wall Street and its excesses.

  • US Elections: Donald Trump’s top campaign expense: hats and t-shirts

    US Elections: Donald Trump’s top campaign expense: hats and t-shirts

    WASHINGTON(TIP): Republican frontrunner Donald Trump spent more on hats, bumper stickers, yard signs and t-shirts than he did on any other category in the third quarter, according to his latest campaign finance report filed on October 15.

    Donald Trump's top campaign expense1The Trump campaign shelled out $825,000 on the logo-emblazoned gear that he sells on a website and routinely tosses to supporters at his rock concert-like campaign events.His next biggest line item was for flights on his personal 757 jet: more than $700,000. The finance report is just the latest illustration of how, when it comes to the 2016 presidential election, Trump is breaking with tradition.

    Donald Trump's top campaign expenseThe real estate developer and former star of the hit television show ‘The Apprentice’ stunned the Republican political elite last summer when he blew past establishment contenders like former Florida Governor Jeb Bush to become an unlikely frontrunner, a title he has maintained since then.

    In typical presidential campaigns, top expenditures are usually payroll, mailings and consultants.

    But those items did not feature largely on Trump’s report. The filing, made with the Federal Election Commission, contained no line item for payroll at all. The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

    Trump raised nearly $4 million in the third quarter. In total, the campaign has raised $5.8 million and spent $5.6 million. Despite proclamations that he would self-fund his candidacy, Trump still raked in unsolicited donations from nearly 74,000 people, who gave an average of $50.46.

    By contrast, Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton raised $30 million in the third quarter. Bush, once the Republican favorite, raised $13.4 million. Despite his lesser standing in the money race, Trump has benefited from a seemingly endless stream of free news and television coverage, a trend that has irked his competitors and helped to upend the conventional political thinking about how the 2016 race for the White House would play out. He has also drawn record crowds, who routinely leap and claw for the free hats that are mostly emblazed with the campaign slogan “Make America Great Again.”

  • Trump, Carson threaten Republican debate boycott

    Trump, Carson threaten Republican debate boycott

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Republican US presidential frontrunner Donald Trump and the candidate who is hot on his heels on Thursday threatened to boycott their party’s next televised debate over its “ridiculous” format.

    Trump and Ben Carson wrote to cable broadcaster CNBC, host of the October 28 showdown, to say they were displeased with an agenda recently sent to their campaign teams that explained the debate would last two hours plus four commercial breaks that would add 16 minutes to the format.

    In another major change, candidates’ opening and closing statements will not be included in the show.

    Trump took to Twitter to blast the “ridiculous” format as a way for CNBC to sell more ads.

    “Why is the GOP being asked to do a debate that is so much longer than the just-aired and very boring #DemDebate?”

    In their letter published by NBC News — NBC Universal owns CNBC — Trump and Carson wrote that neither of the changes were acceptable.

    “Neither Mr. Trump or Dr. Carson will participate in your debate if it is longer than 120 minutes including commercials and does not include opening and closing statements.”

    Trump has dominated the broad Republican field. He leads with 23.4 percent, according to a RealClearPolitics poll average. Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, is second at 19.1 percent. A boycott by Trump, the brash billionaire largely responsible for drawing record viewership to the Republican Party’s first two debates, would spell trouble for CNBC — and for the Republicans — because it could risk driving away viewers.

    The Democrats, led by former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, held their first debate of the 2016 cycle Tuesday, with a party record 15.8 million tuning in. But that was well shy of the Republican debut in August, which drew 24 million viewers, the largest-ever audience for a primary debate.

  • Hillary Clinton proposes plan to hold Wall Street accountable

    Hillary Clinton proposes plan to hold Wall Street accountable

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Leading Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has proposed measures including new taxes for trading to hold Wall Street accountable and reduce risk of the failure of big banks and investor firms.

    “The bottom line is that we can never allow what happened in 2008 to happen again. Just as important, we have to encourage Wall Street to live up to its proper role in our economy — helping Main Street grow and prosper,” Clinton wrote in an op-ed as she rolled out her new set of proposals.

    “I will propose a new fee on risk that would discourage the type of excessive leverage and short-term borrowing that could spark another crisis,” she said, adding that her plan would give regulators the authority they need to reorganise, downsize or even break apart any financial institution that is too large and risky to be managed effectively.

    “It is a comprehensive and flexible approach. It allows regulators to adapt to changing markets and help ensure that large financial firms never pose a danger to our entire economy,” she said.

    Clinton said it is time for more accountability on Wall Street.

    Stories of misconduct in the financial industry are shocking – like HSBC allowing drug cartels to launder money or five major banks pleading guilty to felony charges for conspiring to manipulate currency exchange rates, she said.

    This is criminal behavior, yet the individuals responsible often get off with limited consequences — or none at all. “I want to change that,” she said.

    Following her announcement, The Wall Street Journal said the proposed tax on excessive order cancellations could increase costs, cause market problems.

    “We don’t yet know how good or bad this idea could be,” said James Angel, a professor at Georgetown University who studies markets.

    “If it’s a small fee used for regulatory purposes, then it could be helpful. If it’s more than that, it could end up costing investors more money in a lot of ways,” he told The Wall Street Journal.

    By focusing on cancellations, Clinton runs the risk of hampering an important function of trading firms called market making, according to some market observers, the daily noted.

    Bill Harts, spokesman for the high-frequency trading group Modern Markets Initiative, said taxes on trading firms will only “end up costing investors more” because market-makers would have to widen their spreads to accommodate the added cost.

    Widening the spread means increasing the difference between offered buy and sell order, which would make it more expensive for buyers and sellers of stocks, Harts said.

    However, Joseph Saluzzi from Themis Trading said Clinton’s proposal — if designed correctly — could reduce some of the “noise” in the markets.

    “You’re not going to fix things with a tax, but there should be a fee that helps distribute the costs more fairly and reduces manipulative activity,” he told Journal.

  • Personal Accusations mark the Republican Presidential debate

    Personal Accusations mark the Republican Presidential debate

    NEW YORK (TIP): It has been an acrimonious debate, with presidential candidates hurling accusations at each other. It was an unimpressive debate which did not probably bring out the best in the candidates. And if it were the best in them, God save America!

    Fifteen Republican candidates spent the better part of five hours debating at the Ronald Reagan presidential library on Wednesday, September 16 night.

    Nearly all candidates were critical of the utterances and policy declarations of Donald Trump.

    Indian-American US presidential aspirant Bobby Jindal impressed everyone as he took the lead in launching an attack against Republican front-runner Donald Trump, whose growing popularity has unnerved other party candidates, during the second-tier presidential debate.

  • Fiorina trumps Trump in GOP debate

    Fiorina trumps Trump in GOP debate

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Eleven Republican candidates vying for the party nomination on the road to the White House battered each other in a three-hour debate on Sept 15 night at the end of which, the sole woman in mix, former Hewlett Packard executive Carly Fiorina, shone with her poise and intelligence at the expense of frontrunner Donald Trump. The backdrop of their clash was Trump’s crude remark in a Rolling Stone interview about Fiorina’s looks (“Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?”), and he paid for that with a public dressing down, despite trying to reel it back, saying “I think she’s got a beautiful face and I think she’s a beautiful woman.”

    “I think women all over this country heard very clearly what Trump said,” Fiorina responded curtly , as the two leading candidates eviscerated each other on their business record -Trump saying she was a disaster as HP CEO, and Fiorina calling out Trump’s multiple bankruptcies. Trump was also on the ropes after he was cornered for his remarks on Jeb Bush’s Hispanic wife, which suggested that her being Mexican could cause Bush to be soft on Mexico.

  • Nikki Haley is among four Indian Americans recognized in Politico Magazine’s ‘Politico 50’

    Nikki Haley is among four Indian Americans recognized in Politico Magazine’s ‘Politico 50’

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Four Indian Americans have been recognized in Politico Magazine’s
    “Politico 50” this year for their contributions to politics in the U.S. The magazine names a list of 50 people whom they deem to be “thinkers, doers and visionaries transforming American politics” in the current year.

    Among those acknowledged on the list include South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, columnist Ramesh Ponnuru (and his wife, political adviser April Ponnuru), economist Raj Chetty, and surgeon and writer Atul Gawande.

    Haley, coming in at No. 9 on the list, was integral in the removal of the Confederate flag from outside the statehouse in the wake of the Charleston shootings, noted Politico. “It was a bright spot in a year marked by racial tension,” according to the magazine’s bio on Haley.

    Ramesh Ponnuru and his wife April both came in at No. 32 on the list. Politico describes them as “the young reigning couple of forward-thinking conservative ideas.” Ramesh is a senior editor at National Review and a columnist for Bloomberg View, and is a critic within the Republican party, according to Politico.

    At No. 39 on the list is Chetty, an economist at Stanford and Harvard universities. Chetty and a team of researchers did a study and found out that growing up in different neighborhoods has a serious impact on social mobility. As stated in the magazine, “Little political attention has been paid to the role of neighborhoods in social mobility since civil rights reform efforts in the 1970s. But thanks at least in part to Chetty’s fresh approach to the data, politicians are taking note again.”

    Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is now using Chetty’s ideas in public speaking events.

    Gawande came in at No. 50 on the list. His essay in 2009 on skyrocketing healthcare costs indirectly led to President Barack Obama’s push for what would become the Affordable Care Act. The surgeon wrote a book released in the fall of 2014 saying doctors are not prepared to help terminally ill people die well.

    Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy topped the list. Other notable figures included Pope Francis (No. 4), Secretary of State John Kerry (No. 7) and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (No. 8).

  • Clinton’s lead over Sanders thins even as her edge over GOP shrinks

    Clinton’s lead over Sanders thins even as her edge over GOP shrinks

    WASHINGTON (TIP): A new CNN/ORC poll has found that Hillary Clinton’s lead in the race for the Democratic nomination has fallen to just 10 points, and at the same time, her advantage against the top Republican contenders has vanished. The new poll finds Clinton with 37%support among Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters, down 10 points since August, followed by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders at 27% and Vice President Joe Biden at 20%. Sanders’ support is about the same as it was in August, making Biden the only candidate to post significant gains in the last month. His support is up 6 points in the last month as he weighs making a run for the presidency.

    Behind the top three, former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley holds 3%, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb is at 2% and former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee logs less than 1% support.

    In the general election match ups, Clinton trails former neurosurgeon Ben Carson by a significant margin (51% Carson to 46%Clinton among registered voters) while running about evenly with both former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (49% Bush to 47%Clinton) and businessman Donald Trump (48% back each).

    The shift away from the former secretary of state stems from shrinking support among women. Clinton’s advantage among women has disappeared in match ups against Bush and Carson. Facing Trump, Clinton still carries women by a large, though tighter, margin. In August, 60% of women favored Clinton to 37% for Trump, but that’s narrowed slightly to 55% Clinton, 41%Trump now. Clinton’s advantage among women against Trump is fueled by independent women, despite that group shifting away from Clinton in the head-to-head against Bush.

    The poll suggests Republican women have consolidated their support around their party’s front-runners in the last month, and are now more apt to back both Bush and Trump than they were a month ago. At the same time, the near-universal support for Clinton among Democratic women has softened slightly, bringing it more in-line with her support among Democratic men.

    With Biden’s consideration of a run for the White House gaining attention, the poll finds he outperforms Clinton in these hypothetical general election matchups, topping Bush and Trump while falling just slightly behind Carson. Biden tops Trump by 10 points (54%to 44% among registered voters), leads Bush by 8 points (52% to 44%) and is 3 points behind Carson (50% Carson to 47% Biden). Biden’s advantages against Bush and Trump rest on the same kind of gender gap that Clinton appears to have lost: Biden leads Bush by 16 points among women while tying him among men, he tops Trump by 26 points among women while trailing him by 7 among men, and he leads Carson by 5 among women while trailing by 10 among men.

    The poll also finds Democrats’ overall enthusiasm for Clinton has waned. In April, shortly after she launched her campaign, 60% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters said they would be enthusiastic about her candidacy should she win the party’s nomination for president. Now, just 43% feel that way. But neither Biden nor Sanders has mustered that level of enthusiasm among the Democratic faithful, 37% say they would be enthusiastic about Biden, 31% about Sanders.

    And Sanders prompts the greatest potential dissatisfaction, with 30% saying they would be dissatisfied or upset if he eventually won the party’s nomination.

    Clinton’s fade in the Democratic race comes as an ideological divide within the party grows into a chasm. In August, Clinton held support from 43% of moderates and 46%of liberals. In the new poll, her support among moderates holds at 47%, while among liberals, it has plummeted to just 23%. Sanders has increased his share of the liberal vote (from 42% to 49%), while falling 9 points among moderates (from 24% to 15%). Meanwhile, Biden has gained ground in both groups.

    And enthusiasm for Clinton among liberals has fallen nearly 40 points. Just 29%of liberal Democrats say they would be enthusiastic if she were the party’s nominee, down from 68% in an April poll.

    Asked why they back their candidate, most Clinton supporters said her experience is the draw: 58% say it’s mostly on account of her on the job experience, 32% because of her positions on the issues, and 9% because they don’t like the other candidates. Among those Democrats backing her rivals for the nomination, 55% say their choice was driven by the candidate’s positions on the issues, while 27% cite experience and 17% say it’s due to dislike of the other candidates.

    There is some good news for Clinton in the poll, however, since most Democrats still say they expect her to be the party’s eventual nominee and the more enthusiastic Democratic voters are more apt to be Clinton backers. Among Democrats and Democatic-leaning voters, 65% expect Clinton to top the party’s ticket in 2016. And among those Democratic voters who say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for president next year — a group which may be more likely to cast ballots in next year’s primary contests — 42% back Clinton, 29%Sanders and 15% Biden.

    The CNN/ORC Poll was conducted by telephone September 4-8 among a random national sample of 1,012 adults. This sample included 930 interviews with registered voters, 395 of whom were self-identified Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents. For results among all registered voters, the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points. Among Democratic voters, it is plus or minus 5 points.

    A Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday, September 10, showed Sanders continues to build momentum against Clinton, pulling even with her in Iowa, 41%to 40%. That’s up from a 21-point deficit with Clinton two months ago. Other recent polling that has shown Sanders ahead in another key early primary state, New Hampshire, although Clinton still maintains double-digit leads in national polling.

    Sanders said his campaign has received contributions from more than 400,000 people with an average donation of $31.20, while eschewing raising money for super PACs.

  • US presidential election: The rise and rise of Donald Trump

    US presidential election: The rise and rise of Donald Trump

    HOUSTON (TIP): All 172 people on board a British Airways plane had a miraculous escape Sept 11 after an engine of the aircraft burst into flames on the runway just before taking off from Las Vegas to London.

    The left engine of 257-seat Boeing 777 burst into flames on the runway at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas shortly after 0430 IST while it was about to depart for London’s Gatwick Airport with 159 passengers and 13 crew members on board, according to the airport authorities.

    Heavy black smoke and orange flames could be seen pouring from under the plane’s wings, sending passengers fleeing quickly from the aircraft and across the tarmac before about 50 firefighters doused the aircraft in minutes.

    Officials said 14 people aboard the Flight 2276 were taken to hospital for minor injuries, most as a result of sliding down the inflatable chutes to escape.

    Fire officials said paramedics on the scene were also evaluating some passengers.

    Firefighters stationed at the airport reached the plane two minutes after getting reports of flames and within another three minutes, everyone inside the plane had escaped.

    After firefighters extinguished the flames, emergency vehicles could be seen surrounding the aircraft which was left a sooty gray from the smoke and fire retardant.

    Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Ian Gregor said the plane’s left engine caught fire and an investigation was underway.

    The National Transportation Safety Board was collecting information about the incident, said Eric Weiss, a spokesman for the agency in Washington.

    Clark County deputy fire chief Jon Klassen said the cause of the fire wasn’t clear yet, but the fire didn’t appear to breach the cabin.

    One of the airport’s runways was shut down but operations continued on the other three runways, officials said.

    Las Vegas’ airport is the ninth-busiest in the US and had nearly 43 million passengers last year.

    The airport has been taking steps to accommodate more international travellers seeking direct flights to Europe and Asia, including adding new gates to accommodate wide-body double-decker jets.

  • Obama caught between Clinton, Biden ambitions

    Obama caught between Clinton, Biden ambitions

    WASHINGTON (TIP): President Barack Obama is caught between the White House aspirations of two of his closest advisers: Vice President Joe Biden and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    For months, White House officials expected Clinton to be the Democratic nominee in the 2016 election. Some of Obama’s top political advisers moved to New York to run her campaign and Obama appeared to give his tacit approval, saying she would be an “excellent president.”

    But that bet on Clinton suddenly looks less certain. With Biden weighing his own presidential run more seriously amid signs of weakness in Clinton’s campaign, the White House faces the prospect of a family feud over who will become heir to Obama’s legacy.

    “Certainly he’s got something at stake here,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Monday of Obama’s interest in the 2016 election.

    Biden’s recent overtures to donors and Democratic officials have led to palpable awkwardness in the West Wing as aides _ many with close ties to Clinton, the vice president or both try to maintain impartiality.

    Earnest raised the prospect that Obama could endorse a candidate in the Democratic primary, though others close to the president say it’s unlikely he’d publicly put his thumb on the scale if Clinton and Biden were locked in a close contest. In picking between Biden and Clinton, Obama would be making a choice between two of the most influential members of his administration.

    Obama and Clinton long ago turned their political rivalry from the 2008 primary into an alliance. Clinton left the administration in early 2013 after four years as Obama’s secretary of state, but she and the president still get together for occasional meetings.

  • This US President candidate is just 15

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Donald Trump may be grabbing headlines in the run up to the presidential polls, but an independent candidate is giving him and Hillary Clinton stiff competition, and it turns out it is a 15-year-old from Iowa.

    Deez Nuts, an independent candidate from Iowa, filed to run for the President of the United States with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) last month. According to a Public Policy Polling survey released on Wednesday, Nuts had won 9% of the vote as an independent in North Carolina on top of recent results of 8% in Minnesota and 7% in Iowa from previous polls.

    The results made him what experts confirmed as the most successful independent candidate for president in two decades. Sadly, Deez Nuts does not appear to exist. But Brady Olson, 15, does. It was Olson who filed to run for the US president with the FEC on July 26 as Deez Nuts.

    “Anybody can fill out a Form 2,” FEC deputy press officer Christian Hilland has said.

  • HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS Hilary Camp’s clarifications

    HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS Hilary Camp’s clarifications

    WASHINGTON (TIP): The Hilary emails issue boils over and over again, with politicians and now the issue is before the courts, too. And Hilary camp keeps offering explanations. The latest explanation has come from the Hilary Campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri. She released the following explanation on August 12.

    Here are the basics: 

    Like other Secretaries of State who served before her, Hillary used a personal email address, and the rules of the State Department permitted it. She’s already acknowledged that, in hindsight, it would have been better just to use separate work and personal email accounts. No one disputes that.

    The State Department’s request: 

    Last year, as part of a review of its records, the State Department asked the last four former Secretaries of State to provide any work-related emails they had. Hillary was the only former Secretary of State to provide any materials — more than 30,000 emails. In fact, she handed over too many –the Department said it will be returning over 1,200 messages to her because, in their and the National Archives’ judgment, these messages were completely personal in nature.

    Hillary didn’t send any classified materials over email: 

    Hillary only used her personal account for unclassified email. No information in her emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them. She viewed classified materials in hard copy in her office or via other secure means while traveling, not on email.

    What makes it complicated: 

    It’s common for information previously considered unclassified to be upgraded to classified before being publicly released. Some emails that weren’t secret at the time she sent or received them might be secret now. And sometimes government agencies disagree about what should be classified, so it isn’t surprising that another agency might want to conduct its own review, even though the State Department has repeatedly confirmed that Hillary’s emails contained no classified information at the time she sent or received them.

    To be clear, there is absolutely no criminal inquiry into Hillary’s email or email server.

    Any and all reports to that effect have been widely debunked. Hillary directed her team to provide her email server and a thumb drive in order to cooperate with the review process and to ensure these materials were stored in a safe and secure manner.

    What about the Benghazi committee?

    While you may hear from the Republican-led Benghazi committee about Hillary’s emails, it is important to remember that the committee was formed to focus on learning lessons from Benghazi to help prevent future tragedies at our embassies and consulates around the globe. Instead, the committee, led by Republican Representative Trey Gowdy, is spending nearly $6 million in taxpayer money to conduct a partisan witch-hunt designed to do political damage to Hillary in the run-up to the election.

    Hillary has remained absolutely committed to cooperating.

    That’s why, just as she gave her email server to the government, she’s also testifying before the Benghazi committee in October and is actively working with the Justice Department to make sure they have what they need. She hopes that her emails will continue to be released in a timely fashion.

    It’s worth noting: 

    Many of the Republican candidates for president have done the same things for which they’re now criticizing Hillary. As governor, Jeb Bush owned his own private server and his staff decided which emails he turned over as work-related from his private account. Bobby Jindal went a step further, using private email to communicate with his immediate staff but refusing to release his work-related emails. Scott Walker and Rick Perry had email issues themselves.

    The bottom line: 

    Look, Indrajit, this kind of nonsense comes with the territory of running for president. We know it, Hillary knows it, and we expect it to continue from now until Election Day.

    It’s okay. We’ll be ready. We have the facts, our principles, and you on our side. And it’s vital that you read and absorb the real story so that you know what to say the next time you hear about this around the dinner table or the water cooler.

  • Donald Trump’s 9 craziest comments

    Donald Trump’s 9 craziest comments

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Hosts Megyn Kelly, Chris Wallace and Brett Baier promised they have a plan to keep Donald Trump in line during debate on August 6 night. But they didn’t stop him from doing what he does best: making outlandish statements. Here are a few of his greatest hits from the evening.

    Trump on his business bankruptcies

    “Out of hundreds of deals that I’ve done, on four occasions I’ve taken advantage of the laws of this country…Virtually every person that you read about on the front page of the business section [takes advantage of them]. The difference is that when other people use the laws you don’t read about it.”

    Trump on his own lenders

    “These lenders aren’t babies. These are total killers.”

    Trump on immigration

    “So, if it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t even be talking about illegal immigration, Chris. You wouldn’t even be talking about it. This was not a subject that was on anybody’s mind until I brought it up at my announcement.”

    Trump on Mexico’s “cunning” leaders

    Mexico’s leaders don’t provide benefits for their citizens because “the stupid leaders of the United States will do it for ’em, and that’s happening, whether you like it or not.”

    Trump on Hillary Clinton

    “To Hillary Clinton, I said be at my wedding, and she came to my wedding. You know why? She had no choice. I gave to a foundation that frankly, that foundation is supposed to be used for good. I didn’t know her money would be used on private jets all over the world.”

    Trump on women

    On the first topic of the debate, electability, Megyn Kelly turned to Trump with a question about some of his prior statements. “One of the things people love about you is you speak your mind, and you don’t have a politician’s filter. However, that is not without its downsides, in particular when it comes to women. You’ve called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals. Your Twitter account…”

    Trump cut her off. “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” he said.

    The stadium erupted in applause.

    Trump on political correctness … and winning

    “I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct. I’ve been challenged by so many people and I don’t really have time for total political correctness – and to be honest with you, this country doesn’t have time either. This country is in big trouble. We don’t win anymore. We lose to China, we lose to Mexico, we lose to everybody.”

    Trump on Megyn Kelly

    “Honestly, Megyn, if you don’t like it, I’m sorry, I’ve been very nice to you although I probably could maybe not be based on the way you’ve been to me.”

    Trump on reporters

    “Reporters … They’re a very dishonest lot, generally speaking, in the world of politics.”

  • Indian American Bobby Jindal loses first Republican presidential debate chance

    Indian American Bobby Jindal loses first Republican presidential debate chance

    Washington: Bobby Jindal failed to make the cut for Fox News’ prime-time first Republican presidential debate on Thursday with celebrity real estate mogul leading the ten top polling candidates.

    Besides Trump, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, author and neurosurgeon Ben Carson and conservative firebrand Cuban American Texas senator Ted Cruz made the top six.

    They will be joined on the main stage by Cuban American Florida senator Marco Rubio, libertarian conservative Kentucky senator and physician Rand Paul, New Jersey governor Chris Christie and Ohio governor John Kasich.

    Finishing thirteenth, Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal, 44, a former vice chairman of the Republican Governors’ Association, was relegated to an earlier forum the same day with the six other candidates lowest in Fox’s selection of polls.

    They included former Texas governor Rick Perry, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, former HP chief executive Carly Fiorina, South Carolina senator Lindsey Graham, former New York governor George Pataki, and former Virginia governor Jim Gilmore.

    The debate in Cleveland, Ohio, marks the beginning of a new stage in the Republican nominating contest, where candidates will match their wits against each other as they try to project how they are best positioned to take on Democratic front runner Hillary Clinton.

    In an unusual move backed by the Republican National Committee, Fox decided to rely on national polling data to split the contenders in two groups.

    The decision means Perry, governor of Texas for 14 years, Santorum, who won the Iowa caucuses in 2012, and a sitting governor like Jindal will be relegated to the lower-tier debate.

    There was no direct comment from Jindal, but Brad Todd, an adviser to the “super PAC” backing the Indian-American, who has drawn large crowds in Iowa, said: “The debate’s gotten disproportionate attention – the real race is happening in Iowa and New Hampshire.”

    Todd according to the New York Times said his group planned to air a 60-second ad in Iowa during the debate, one that criticises the forum taking place in Cleveland.

    “The donor class will not pick the nominee, nor will the establishment in Washington, nor a cable network,” he was quoted as saying. “I think it could have been done better for all concerned.

    Fox News spokeswoman Irena Briganti said the five polls included in Fox’s average were conducted by Bloomberg, CBS News, Fox News, Monmouth University and Quinnipiac University.

    Those five were the most recent national polls from non-partisan, nationally recognized organizations, she said, using standard methodology.

  • Hillary’s former Indian American aide Huma Abedin under scrutiny

    Hillary’s former Indian American aide Huma Abedin under scrutiny

    Indian-American Huma Abedin who worked and is still vice chairwoman for the 2016 Clinton presidential campaign to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is being probed for allegedly accepting overpayments from the State Department while working for the then US secretary of state (Huma Abedin worked as a full time staffer for Hillary Clinton from January 2009 until June 2012), media reported on Tuesday, Aug 4.

    Huma Abedin, who has been at Mrs. Clinton’s side as her personal assistant since the 2008 presidential race, has come under scrutiny for pocketing a $33,000 payout from the State Department for unused leave and using her simultaneous employment inside and outside of government to “deliver favors” to Clinton cronies.

    “Abedin leveraged her State Department job to benefit her two other employers at that time – the Clinton Foundation and a consulting firm called Teneo Strategies (Teneo Strategies was founded by Douglas Band, a long time aide to Bill Clinton),” claimed a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry, written by senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Washington Examiner reported.
    In his letter, Grassley wrote to Abedin – “The committee has learned of allegations that, during your simultaneous employment by the Department of State, Teneo, and the Clinton Foundation, you were solicited for and delivered favors for preferred individuals”. The letter added, She was given a “special government employee” designation and soon took on roles at the Clinton Foundation and Teneo.
    Grassley also called into question a $33,000 payment Abedin received from the State Department for leave she had not used.
    “During approximately three and a half years as a full time government employee, Ms Abedin reportedly never requested, was approved for, or had her leave balance reduced for use of any sick leave, annual leave, or administrative leave,” he said in the letter.
    A federal judge last week ordered her and another top Clinton aide at the State Department, Cheryl Mills, to attest, under penalty of perjury, that they had turned over all official email in their possession.The order followed a revelation that Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills used a private email account for official business, just like their boss, whose secretive email setup with private accounts hosted on a server in Mrs. Clinton’s home in New York has raised questions about her skirting open-records laws and mishandling classified information.Ms. Abedin, 39, holds the title of vice chairwoman for the 2016 Clinton presidential campaign, but she continues to serve as Mrs. Clinton’s “girl Friday.” She was captured on surveillance video alongside Mrs. Clinton when the former first lady, senator and top diplomat went unnoticed ordering a burrito bowl at a Chipotle restaurant in Ohio on the first road trip for the campaign.

    The Clinton campaign refused to comment on the increased focus on Ms. Abedin.

    Ms. Abedin’s attorney, Karen L. Dunn, called the inspector general’s report “fundamentally flawed.”

    “Huma Abedin is widely known as one of the hardest working and most dedicated public servants over the nearly two decades she served,” she said in a statement.

    “The Inspector General’s report is fundamentally flawed, including contradicting its own conclusion by finding that Huma — a woman who regularly worked 16-20 hour days — also worked hard while on maternity leave,” she said. “No hardworking, dedicated public servant should be subjected to such irresponsible allegations based on a fundamentally flawed report — and it is appropriate that the State Department is now reviewing the IG’s report. Huma has been nothing but cooperative in helping the Department work through its record keeping issues, and she will continue to do so in the hope the right thing is done.”

    Mr. Grassley also said the auditor’s finding found evidence that Ms. Abedin’s overlapping employment inside and outside government created conflicts of interest and special treatment for people with connections to Teneo and the Clinton Foundation.

  • Here’s how Iran’s Nuke Deal can benefit India

    Here’s how Iran’s Nuke Deal can benefit India

    Breakthrough Nuclear Deal

    • Iran has agreed to limit the scope of its nuclear program
    • US-led sanctions on Iran will be lifted
    • Tehran has accepted managed access to its nuclear facilities
    • Tehran has accepted a ‘snapback’ clause where sanctions can be re-imposed if there is any violation of the enrichment commitments

    The long-awaited nuclear rapprochement between Iran and the US-led P 5 + 1 nations is a development of significant import both at the regional and global level with many overlapping strands of strategic relevance — many of which will have a bearing on the Indian calculus.

    While the full text of the final agreement — ‘where even one comma could make a difference’ — is yet to be released, the broad contours are as follows: Iran has agreed to limit the scope of its nuclear program so that it is not nuclear weapon capable; US-led sanctions on Iran will be lifted; Tehran has accepted managed access to its nuclear facilities (this issue had delayed the agreement and now a modus vivendi has been reached whereby Iran can challenge the access sought by external inspectors); and Tehran has accepted a ‘snapback’ clause where sanctions can be re-imposed in a period of 65 days if there is any violation or transgression of the enrichment commitments entered into.

    ‘Surrendered’ Too Much for Too Little?

    This is an agreement that has been on the horizon for some months and in April last the first glimmer of hope was articulated by the principal interlocutors. US President Obama and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani must be commended for their perspicacity and determination in staying the course despite the bitter opposition of hard-liners or allies (in the case of the US).

    Late night Monday there was heightened expectation that the agreement had been sealed when the Iranian President sent out a tweet that read:
    #IranDeal is the victory of diplomacy & mutual respect over the outdated paradigm of exclusion & coercion. And this is a good beginning.
    — Hassan Rouhani, Iranian President

    However this was a case of jumping the gun and was soon withdrawn, but in a matter of 12 hours the elusive end had been reached. For sure, there will be intense criticism mounted against both the Presidents (Obama and Rouhani) for having ‘surrendered’ too much for too little. But the triumph of diplomacy — even if it is nascent and has to be monitored almost weekly — is welcome for many reasons.

    The extended southern Asian region has been in a state of uneasy and contested geo-political flux since the beginning of the Iranian revolution in 1979. Concurrently the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and the events of that decade saw the spread of the mujahedin ideology which culminated in the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991 that marked the end of the Cold War.

    Will the Deal Help India?

    India has been affected by these convulsions and the estrangement between Iran and the US-led western alliance has adversely impacted India’s holistic national interest.
    The better known eventuality has been the pressure on India and other Asian economies to reduce their hydrocarbon imports from Iran.

    The tentative rapprochement between Iran and the US-led cluster will have a bearing on India’s interests across three determinants — the geo-political; geo-economic; and geo-physical. Bringing Iran back into the global comity will have an immediate impact on issues like Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria where varying degrees of jihadi/terror-related violence and sectarian civil war are now unspooling on a daily basis. How Tehran will position itself given the Saudi Arabia- Iran (read Sunni-Shia ) relationship remains to be seen but the operative point is that Iran has now been brought back into the regional and global geo-political and diplomatic tent.

    Specific to Afghanistan, it may be recalled that India had engaged with both Iran and Russia in the early 1990s in supporting the Northern Alliance against the Taliban.
    The geo-economic implications are also considerable, for Iran is the world’s fourth largest oil producer and has been extracting its valuable natural resource well below optimum levels. The lifting of sanctions will see a major investment and modernization of Iran’s long-neglected hydrocarbon sector and this will be good news for major oil importers like India.

    The third strand — the geo-physical encompasses the trade and connectivity possibilities that are very significant for India. Iran and its ports — particularly Chabahar open up transport linkages for India that will trump Pakistani intransigence. In the most positive exigency, Iran can offer transit routes to Afghanistan and Central Asia with concomitant geo-political and geo-economic returns for India.

    These are broad contours of what may ensue over the coming months – but the possibility of domestic backlash in both Washington and Tehran cannot be discounted.

    (The author is Director, Society for Policy Studies, New Delhi.)

  • ‘Tanned. Rested. Ready’ – Bobby Jindal’s 2016 US Presidential Campaign Slogan

    ‘Tanned. Rested. Ready’ – Bobby Jindal’s 2016 US Presidential Campaign Slogan

    That is Indian-American Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal’s new 2016 presidential campaign slogan and the “tanned” part is supposed to be a reference to his skin tone.

    “The liberal media that developed this week was disgusting: Apparently Bobby isn’t brown enough for them,” wrote Timmy Teepell, Mr Jindal’s campaign manager, in an email to supporters.

    “Well, this will make the left even more upset. We are now selling the first limited edition t-shirt of the campaign, and I want you to know about it,” Mr Teepell was quoted as saying by The Times-Picayune.

    Bobby Jindal, 44, used a similar line about being “tanned” in his official presidential campaign launched on June 24.

    National media has seized on Mr Jindal’s relationship with the Indian community, even as he himself has tried to distance himself from his Indian roots.

    Mr Jindal, a Republican, has time and again reiterated his remarks about de-hyphenating Indians and other ethnic groups from Americans.

    “I am done with all this talk about hyphenated Americans.

    We are not Indian-Americans, African-Americans, Irish Americans, rich Americans or poor Americans. We are all Americans,” he had said while announcing his 2016 presidential bid.

    In February, several news outlets questioned whether a portrait that hangs in Louisiana’s Capitol makes Bobby Jindal appear to be a white man.

    Though against categorisation of Indian-American, Mr Jindal does not shy away from his parents’ immigration story in political speeches. The governor frequently references the tough journey his parents took from India to Baton Rouge as a point of pride. He made sure to outline their travails during his official presidential launch.

    Mr Jindal’s talk about dehyphenating Americans had riled many Indians and he faced a barrage of criticism on Twitter following the announcing of his presidential bid.

    The governor’s team has termed this as absurd and said that the new t-shirt which has the slogan imprinted on it is one way they are trying to discredit this type of criticism.

    Mr Jindal, the first Indian-American to make a presidential bid, is the 13th Republican aspirant to target the White House in this election cycle.

  • BJP’S QUARTET WORRY – VASUNDHARA RAJE, SUSHMA SWARAJ, SMRITI IRANI, PANKAJA MUNDE

    BJP’S QUARTET WORRY – VASUNDHARA RAJE, SUSHMA SWARAJ, SMRITI IRANI, PANKAJA MUNDE

    NEW DELHI (TIP): The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has always prided on its women power and given them due weight in the political scheme of things. From installing Anandiben Patel as Gujarat’s chief minister after Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister to selecting Indore’s popular 7-time MP Sumitra Mahajan as Lok Sabha speaker, the party has always put out indications that it was not reluctant to nominate deserving women to powerful posts.

    But today, it’s the same women power threatening to drag the BJP through one of its most tumultuous times. On the completion of its one year in office, senior BJP leaders may have been relieved that it has  largely been a corruption-free

    year, with no major scams. But now  the circumstances are different. The opposition, led  by the Congress, is gunning for the resignations of four women BJP leaders – two cabinet ministers, one chief minister and one state minister. The controversies are raging, resignations are pending and the BJP is scrambling for solutions.

    Vasundhara Raje

    Vasundhara RajeIn every way, Vasundhara RajeScindia has been BJP’s trump card in Rajasthan. In late 2013, she led the party to its biggest victory winning three-fourths of the seats in the state Assembly. Six months later, she created another record by helping the party win all 25 seats in the 2014 parliamentary elections. She followed it up with ground-breaking labor reforms and meeting foreign tycoons to lure investments. However, the card fell flat last week after documents emerged purportedly showing Raje secretly supporting Lalit Modi’s bid to obtain immigration documents in UK. The Lalit Modi row thus took a detour, away from Swaraj, and focused on Raje. Earlier, the BJP through its senior leader Nitin Gadkari had announced support for Raje, but with crucial evidence now emerging, time may indeed be up for Raje. She may have to relinquish the top post and allow for an investigation to proceed.

    Sushma Swaraj

    Sushma SwarajIf there has been one minister in the Modi government who was lauded for her work (even by the opposition) in its one year, it is probably Sushma Swaraj. As India’s foreign minister, Swaraj’s hands-on approach especially in the crises in Yemen and Nepal have been praise-
    worthy. When the historic land boundary agreement was passed in Parliament, members across both the treasury and opposition benches spoke of her contributions to the bill. And yet, within months, the same members have been baying for her resignation amidst the furor around fugitive ex-IPL boss Lalit Modi. In early June, UK newspaper Sunday Times reported that Swaraj had helped in facilitating travel documents for Modi, who faces several charges of financial impropriety by the Enforcement Directorate. Swaraj hit back saying that it was purely on ‘humanitarian grounds’ as Modi’s wife was suffering from cancer, that she intervened to get him a travel document. But the row has only blown bigger and bigger. Suspicions of an internal rebellion within the BJP cannot be ruled out either over the controversy. The BJP and the government has staunchly defended Swaraj, but as more and more evidence arises, it is not clear how long the party can hold on.

    Pankaja Munde

    Pankaja MundeAfter the demise of Gopinath Munde, one of BJP’s tallest leaders in Maharashtra, it was his daughter Pankaja Munde who stepped into his shoes and announced herself as the heir to his legacy. Her sister may have won a Lok Sabha seat from Maharashtra, but it was Pankaja who positioned herself for the rough-and-tough state politics. She had conviction, no doubt and spoke quite fiercely on popular issues. At one point of time, during the state elections last year, there were murmurs that she could even be named the chief minister. But the responsibility finally went to Devendra Fadnavis, the older and more experienced politician. Nevertheless, Pankaja was given the crucial Women and Child Development (WCD) portfolio. But today, less than a year after she entered office, she faces allegations of corruption worth more than Rs 200 crore. A complaint has been registered by the Congress against the WCD department headed by Pankaja which alleges that she awarded contracts worth Rs 206 crore for procuring chikkis, medicines, growth monitoring machines, water filters, carpets and educational material for aanganwadis on a single day without inviting tenders. After the allegation surfaced, Pankaja denied any wrongdoing and said she was ready for a probe. But the state BJP is rattled. It is the first corruption allegation to hit the government and the party in Maharashtra.

    Smriti Irani

    Smriti IraniEver since her debut in politics, Smriti Zubin Irani, a television actress- turned-politician, has had an uphill graph at least with the BJP. She has always answered her party’s call, even when she was asked to stand against Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi in Amethi in the 2014 LS elections. She may have lost but she was rewarded with a cabinet portfolio – the highly regarded Human Resource & Development (HRD) ministry – thus becoming the youngest member of the Modi cabinet. But a controversy, that has affected her on and off, is the one surrounding her alleged fake educational degree. It had first come up in 2014 when Smriti was accused of furnishing false information while filing her affidavit with the Election Commission. In a setback for the minister, a Delhi court took cognizance of a complaint that was filed against her. Immediately, both the Congress and the AAP demanded her resignation. But the BJP has not stirred yet. Is it waiting for the controversy to get bigger? No one knows.

  • Hillary Clinton on course to win 2016 presidential election: Poll

    Hillary Clinton on course to win 2016 presidential election: Poll

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Hillary Clinton is the firm favourite to be chosen as the Democratic Party nominee for 2016 US presidential polls and go on to be elected as the first woman president of America, according to a new poll.

    A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll taken in the days after Clinton held her first public rally earlier this month, showed the former secretary of state garnering broad support for being chosen the Democratic presidential nominee.

    Three-quarters of Democratic primary voters said Clinton was their top pick to be the nominee, compared with the 15 per cent who selected Bernie Sanders.

    Clinton, 67, enters the 2016 contest with unusually broad support from fellow Democrats with some 92 per cent of Democratic primary voters saying they could see themselves supporting her and just 8 per cent saying they could not, according to the poll.

    But it is not that Clinton just emerges as the strongest contender in the primary vote but the poll shows that she is looking set for a successful November 2016 election bid to become the first woman president of America.

    The poll asked 1,000 likely voters about their opinions on potential presidential candidates, both Republican and Democrat.

    It showed Clinton polling at 48 per cent to 40 per cent against her closest Republican contender, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, the brother of former president George W Bush and son of former president George HW Bush.

    Against the Florida senator Marco Rubio, Clinton polled 50 per cent against 40 per cent. And against Wisconsin governor Scott Walker she polled 51 per cent to 37 per cent.

    The survey found that Americans are divided on whether they want the next president to be a Republican or a Democrat. But among many key demographic groups, Clinton outpaces the support for her party.

    “The poll underscores Clinton’s strength as a candidate, both among Democrats and key constituencies that could tip the balance in a general election. But the results also show a clear desire among Democratic voters for a rival to emerge and hint at potential cracks in her support,” the Wall Street Journal said.

    Among Republican primary voters, the poll showed Bush ahead with 22 per cent of the vote. Walker was next with 17 per cent and Rubio third with 14 per cent. Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson had 11 per cent, while former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee 9 per cent, libertarian senator Rand Paul 7 per cent, former Texas governor Rick Perry 5 per cent, New Jersey governor Chris Christie 4 per cent and Texas senator Ted Cruz 4 per cent were all in single figures.

  • Why Indian-Americans could switch to the GOP

    Why Indian-Americans could switch to the GOP

    With the 2016 US presidential elections fast approaching, how will the Indian-Americans – the fastest-growing, 3.2-million-strong minority community – vote? Starting off as a small immigrant group back in the early 1800s, Indian-Americans now account for America’s second largest immigrant group. Indian Americans have a large presence in various fields, including business, medicine, and technology. This community is the most highly-educated minority in the country – nearly 70% of Indian Americans in the US have bachelor’s degrees compared to just 28% of Americans overall. Even in politics, the share of Indian-American representation is only rising.

    The Indian-American community has voted largely for the Democrats perhaps in part due to the racialization of American politics. This mindset separates the electorate into two groups: the white population and the minority population. As a result, Indian-Americans are further united with all the other minorities, pushing them into the Democrat camp, which continues to become more diverse. However, if one looks closely at Indian-Americans, they could actually be a natural fit for the Republican Party for three important reasons.

    First, they are one of the most successful minority groups in the entire country. Business success has a correlation to more conservative political leanings. Indian-American median annual household income of $88,000 is almost twice the average American equivalent, and also 33% higher than the average household income of Asians in the United States overall. These statistics reflect the community’s belief that with talent and hard work, success is possible without any help from the government – sound familiar?

    Second, Indian-Americans also have strong family values as a result of cultural and religious traditions that are centuries old. Looking forward to 2016, the GOP is struggling to connect with minorities, and bringing Indian-Americans on board could help them increase their constituent diversity, and thereby credibility. This could enable the GOP to prepare the party for crucial changes to US demographics that could otherwise shift the political spectrum out from under their feet.

    Third, most Indians who immigrated to the US moved because of the economic paralysis from Nehruvian socialism in India. This populace stands for economic opportunity in a free and competitive market — the same economic values that resonate with the GOP. In last year’s national elections back in India, the country’s center-right Bharatiya Janata Party leader, Narendra Modi, won a landslide election on the platform of economic growth and jobs, routing the leftist Congress party after a 10-year rule.

    Indian-Americans here likewise showed overwhelming support for BJP’s Modi. Most of them still maintain strong ties to India, whether through travel, or teaching their children the language and culture. Let’s wait to see if the drastic shift in voting patterns back in India actually influences the sizable Indian-American community in next year’s elections in America.

    Shalaka Joshi is an intern in the foreign and defense policy department of the American Enterprise Institute. This article first appeared on the AEI site.

  • REPUBLICAN MIKE HUCKABEE LAUNCHES 2016 US PRESIDENTIAL BID WITH FIERY SPEECH

    HOPE, ARK (TIP).: Republican Mike Huckabee announced a run for his party’s 2016 presidential nomination on May 3 with a fiery, populist speech aimed at energizing support from the Christian right and blue-collar Americans struggling to make ends meet.

    The 59-year-old former Arkansas governor and former host of a popular Fox News television show is a long shot in the widening race to represent the Republican Party in the November 2016 election. Huckabee is the sixth Republican to make a formal bid.

    The former Southern Baptist pastor rode support from social conservatives opposing abortion rights and gay marriage to an early surprise victory in the 2008 White House race. Huckabee will again face competition for those voters.

    He said that, if elected, he would change government polices to focus more on working-class Americans.

    “I don’t come from a family dynasty, but a working family. I grew up blue-collar, not blue blood,” he said, in an apparent reference to former Florida Governor Jeb Bush and Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton.

    Huckabee chose to announce his bid in the small town of Hope, Arkansas, which both he and former Democratic President Bill Clinton call their hometown.

    At a community college where the event was held, audience members chanted, “We like Mike!”

    Huckabee spoke of his life in Hope, recalling daily prayers, fishing and hunting. He met his wife at the high school they attended.

    The candidate said hard-working Americans are being left behind in today’s economy, and blamed Democratic President Barack Obama for U.S. economic woes.

    “Ninety-three million Americans don’t have jobs,” Huckabee said. “And many of them who do have seen their full-time job with benefits they once had become two part-time jobs with no benefits at all.

    “We were promised hope, but it was just talk,” he said, referring to a major theme of Obama’s successful 2008 presidential bid.

    Huckabee reiterated his long-held opposition to abortion and gay marriage, deeply held concerns for evangelical Christians and other social conservatives. In recent years, they have seen same-sex marriage gain wider support and win legalization in an increasing number of states.

    “We’ve lost our way, morally,” Huckabee said, referring to abortion as “slaughter” and to “the biblical principles of natural marriage.”

    Huckabee became a national figure in 2008 by staging an upset win in Iowa’s kickoff presidential nominating contest.

    In addition to Huckabee and Cruz, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Marco Rubio of Florida, former Hewlett-Packard Co chief Carly Fiorina and retired neursurgeon Ben Carson are seeking the Republican nomination.

  • Socialist Sanders throws reddish hat into US Presidential ring

    Socialist Sanders throws reddish hat into US Presidential ring

    WASHINGTON (TIP): In a country where the term socialism is almost taboo, a Senator who comfortably describes himself as a ”Democratic Socialist” has thrown his hat in the 2016 Presidential election ring, much to the delight of the liberal-leftist fringe in the United States.

    Bernie Sanders, the Independent Senator from Vermont, a state known as much for its progressive politics as its marginal separatist tendency, declared on Thursday that he would run for president as a Democrat, providing the first official challenge to Hillary Clinton for the party nomination. He is having to take on the Democratic affiliation to avoid problems with getting on state ballots and participating in debates that independents face.

    Few pundits give the grandfatherly 73-year-old Sanders any realistic chance to win the nomination. But he is expected to perform the important role of forcing Hillary Clinton to address left-liberal issues that he has passionately espoused, such as reducing income inequality and scaling back the influence of money in politics, a platform on which his rival is particularly vulnerable at this moment.

    Sanders’s run in the 2016 election cycle was in the works for some time now and his website had announced ”A political revolution is coming” while seeking donations and snarkily remarking that the campaign is ”Paid for by Bernie 2016 (not the billionaires),” a swipe at rest of the field backed by money bags. On Thursday, as Clinton was fighting to ward off attacks from the right about alleged quid pro quo in which foreign governments and business entities funneled money into the Clinton Foundation for favors, Sanders, looking positively pristine, made his move.

    If elected, Sanders would be the oldest person and the first Jewish individual to be US President, not to speak of the first person to win with an overtly socialist label. A civil rights’ activist, whose father lost his family in the Holocaust, he has spent time in Israel on a kibbutz in course of championing a socialist way of life.

    Even President Barack Obama jocularly endorsed his quirky politics in a light-hearted moment at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner last week, gagging, ”I like Bernie. Bernie is an interesting guy. Apparently some folks really want to see a pot-smoking socialist in the White House. We could get a third Obama term after all.”

    The odds are formidable, not only because of Sanders’s age and what some see as the socialist stigma around him, but also on account of his modest resources in what is arguably the world’s most expensive election marketplace where billions of dollars are poured in by big business lobbies and vested interests.

    Sanders though has indicated he is not fazed by the odds or his modest means, while indicating that he will bank on small contributions from ordinary people, much the same way candidate Obama amassed a campaign war chest. ”People should not underestimate me,” he told The Associated Press. ”I’ve run outside of the two-party system, defeating Democrats and Republicans, taking on big-money candidates, and I think the message that has resonated in Vermont is a message that can resonate all over this country.”

  • CONGRESS PARTY: Time to pass the baton to a new generation

    CONGRESS PARTY: Time to pass the baton to a new generation

    There was so much commotion made of Rahul Gandhi’s absence from the political scene in India for the last two months. BJP which regularly made him an object of sarcasm and sharp criticism appeared to have missed him the most!Although Mr. Gandhi is supposed to have the SPG protection and the Government might have been privy to his whereabouts, BJP did their utmost to fuel the speculation through leaks and other means that he was absconding.

    Although the timing of his absence could be questioned, where Rahul Gandhi travels for a vacation or vipassana has very little impact on the political dynamics in India as he wields no power or authority to affect any substantive change. Why then all this hue and cry? It is politics as usual in India where the ruling party prefers to talk about Rahul’s vacation more than it does about the 7000 suicides of the farmers under Modi’s watch.

    However, quickly upon his return, he sprung into action by attending a massive rally of farmers in New Delhi and went on the offensive accusing Modi government of turning its back on the poor and ignoring the plight of the farmers. His actions not only put the Prime Minister on the defensive, but Modi was compelled to gather a meeting of all BJP Parliamentarians in a hurry to showcase his concern and sympathy for those rural folks.

    The tables seemed to have been reversed barely within a year after the BJP under the banner of ‘strong and dynamic leadership of Narendra Modi’ promising “Acche Din” rode to power with an impressive mandate. They have characterized Congress as a party with no vision and a thing of the past. They were dismissive of India’s emergence as a global economic power mostly under the leadership of Congress party in the last 65 years and declared their intention to make India ‘Congress free’.

    According to news reports, Farmer Tarachand Mathur was one of millions of Indians who voted for Narendra Modi to power last year, but the government’s push to make it easier for big business to forcibly acquire land means he won’t be backing the premier again. Mathur, 64, believes Modi has turned his back on the plight of farmers, many of them have seen their crops devastated by unseasonable rains since the start of this year.

    Bhupender Rawat, from the non-profit National Alliance for people’s Movement, is quoted as saying
    ‘farmers are not fools; they can see what Modi is trying to do’. ‘Modi has been going abroad and telling investors – come to India, we will give you cheap land and labor – and the farmers are getting cheated’. Rawat added.

    This issue is very close to Rahul’s heart as he has always identified with the poor and empathized with their plight during his crisscrossing of rural India while championing their cause. Even to his fiercest critics, his concern and commitment to the uplifting of the disadvantaged is simply unquestionable!

    Last October, I had the opportunity to sit down with him at his residence in Delhi and to discuss the May election debacle and about the future of the Congress Party. Although I was interested to talk about the need to get the Diaspora more connected as the Party was introspecting, he took the conversation entirely to a different direction; the current dynamics that is underway in the body politic of India.

    He spoke at length of the pre-independence coalition of feudalists, colonialist-sympathizers, royalists, ultra-nationalists who promoted caste hierarchy, division and bigotry and opposed the Independence struggle led by Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. According to him, elements from that same coalition have regrouped and are re-branding themselves with strong religious overtones to undo the progress Congress-led governments have made over six decades. He believes that unless checked, these regressive forces would take India backward and nullify the prospects for the poor and the downtrodden to make any progress on their own. He reiterated his strong belief in the principle that political tranquility is fundamental to economic prosperity and that every segment of the society including the minorities should play a part in the development of the nation.

    Obviously, he is a follower of the Nehruvian philosophy of inclusiveness and tolerance and a believer in affirmative actions to level the playing field for those who are backward and disadvantaged in the society. To many in the opposition, this entire clamor about ‘dynastic rule’ merely translates into doing away with the Nehruvian vision and subscribing to a regressive past. Therefore, a successful re-entry of Rahul Gandhi into the political arena assures a continuity that is anathema to this audience.

    Then there are those who blame Rahul Gandhi for the disastrous defeat of the Congress Party in the May election. However, to any independent observer, the election was regarded as Modi’s to lose. With every Congress leader I have interacted, there was a mood of resignation and inertia prior to the election. There was very little enthusiasm from top to bottom as the grass root workers mostly stayed away to make any difference. Why then blame Rahul alone for the defeat of the party?  He tried to do his best while many, if not all, in the top leadership could neither articulate nor defend so many of the accomplishments of the UPA I and UPA II before the public.

    The Congress party was at its rock bottom when Sonia Gandhi assumed its presidency in 1998 and her sheer determination and dedicated effort paved the way for the two successive terms for the Congress-led government. Many of its seasoned leaders have contributed a great deal to its success over the years. However, we are at a juncture where an infusion of new blood and incorporation of innovative ideas is critical to the party’s very survival whereas many in the senior leadership could continue to play a role as elder statesmen providing wisdom and guidance to a new and decisive leadership.

    Time has come for a new generation of leadership for the party. There are indeed many bright young leaders waiting in the wings and willing to get on with rebuilding the Congress party. However, I believe, having been appointed as the Vice-President, Rahul Gandhi ought to be given an opportunity to lead the party. Let him get a chance to prove his metal. He is bound to make his share of mistakes and the senior leaders are not immune on that score till now.

    It is time to end the long introspection and endless analysis. Having two power centers for the party seems to confuse the cadre and obfuscate the message to the public. Let him restructure the organization to make it more responsive to the public and get connected to the Diaspora. The frustration exhibited by the farmers towards this Government is only the tip of the iceberg. At the end of the day, compassionate policies and ethical governance will trump empty oratory and tailored suits. To paraphrase Mark Twain, the death of the Congress party is highly exaggerated. Let the new era begin!

  • Candidate Hillary

    Candidate Hillary

    OnApril 12, Hillary Clinton moved one step closer to becoming the first-ever woman President of the United States. The 2016 election will be her second presidential run. To succeed this time she will have to eschew the theme of
    “inevitability” that had crept into her bruising primaries battle against Barack Obama in 2008, and that ultimately sank her campaign. The former First Lady was off to a quick start in her campaign video and came out swinging for the fences as a would-be “champion of everyday Americans”. The implied focus on the welfare of the middle class is a throwback to liberal Democratic values and poses a challenge to Republican Party free-marketeers. It may also reflect her intention to separate her record from that of the inc umbent Mr. Obama; this was mostly evident in her comment that “the cards are still stacked” against the common person. Ms. Clinton is indeed a different beast to the President, although pundits predict she will borrow elements of campaign design from her former boss, and indeed the social media strategies employed so ably by Team Modi in 2013-14. Buttressing her nuts-and-bolts approach to campaign management, she can be expected to project her deep understanding of the paralysed politics of Washington, and be unapologetic about her political pedigree.

    But will all this be enough? And if it is, will she reshape the American story to fit better into a turbulent world?The Republican Party is not throwing up any inspiring leaders. Among the hopefuls, Jeb Bush has the clout of his last name but not much else. Ted Cruz is considered to be a fringe candidate, even among Republican heavyweights. Marco Rubio has passable charisma and an important connection to the Latino community, but he would flounder if he went toe-to-toe against a much more experienced Ms. Clinton. Though her entry into the Oval Office is far from being a certainty as of now, the greater challenge for her may be knowing what to do once she gets there. She was, after all, leading the Obama action that fumbled through the Arab Spring. Would she do it differently a second time? The rise of Islamic State will certainly dominate the attention of the next POTUS. She also promised, in a 2010 speech, that the administration would think “smart power” and focus on multilateralism, regional architectures and broad-strategic engagements with countries such as India, Russia and China. Clearly that dream didn’t materialise. On domestic policy , however, the Obama years offer hope. Just as he tackled the inequities of the health-care system head-on, Ms. Clinton could do much to close the gender pay gap, tackle America’s rape crisis, and upgrade its education system to help the millennials thrive in the workforce. That, and much more. Her time is now.