Why economists say rupee at 100 against $ is not a crisis for India

New Delhi (TIP): The rupee has been on a roller-coaster ride in recent months, sliding sharply against the US dollar as the global oil shock deepens and tensions in West Asia continue to disrupt energy markets.
With crude oil prices remanding above $100 per barrel amid the ongoing West Asia conflict, many economists now believe the rupee touching 100 against the dollar may no longer be unthinkable.
And interestingly, a growing number of experts also argue that the real risk for India may not be the rupee touching 100 itself, but what happens to inflation, jobs and economic stability alongside it.
Former IMF Deputy Managing Director and Harvard University professor Gita Gopinath recently captured this shift in thinking when she argued that policymakers should focus less on the symbolic exchange-rate level and more on the broader economy. “The relevant number is not the actual value of the exchange rate,” Gopinath said in a recent interview.
“What matters is jobs, inflation and output,” she said.
That view is increasingly finding support among economists and market experts as India navigates a worsening global energy crisis.
For years, rupee weakness was often viewed almost entirely as a sign of economic stress. But economists say currency depreciation during a major external shock is not automatically a bad thing.
In fact, a weaker rupee can sometimes help economies adjust.
When the rupee falls, imports become more expensive. That naturally reduces demand for foreign goods, lowers pressure on India’s foreign exchange reserves and can improve export competitiveness by making Indian products cheaper globally.
“Rupee depreciation is partly a problem and partly a solution to the problem,” said Dr. VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Investments Limited.
“Rupee depreciation boosts exports and at the same reduces foreign exchange expenditure. Expensive dollar can curtail forex expenditure more than austerity appeals. That way it is a solution to the problem,” he added. This logic becomes especially important during oil shocks.
India imports the majority of its crude oil requirements. With tensions around the Strait of Hormuz disrupting global energy flows, elevated oil prices are already increasing pressure on India’s import bill and dollar demand.
In such situations, economists argue that allowing the currency to weaken gradually can help absorb part of the shock instead of forcing the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to aggressively burn through forex reserves defending a symbolic exchange-rate level.
The growing argument against aggressively defending the rupee has also found support from former NITI Aayog Vice Chairman and Chairman of the 16th Finance Commission Arvind Panagariya.
In a recent post on X, Panagariya directly urged the RBI not to allow the “psychology” of the Rs 100 mark to shape policy decisions.
“100 is just a number, like 99 and 101,” he wrote.
According to Panagariya, allowing the rupee to depreciate during an oil shock may actually be the more sustainable strategy, especially if elevated energy prices persist for a prolonged period.
“If the oil shortage is long-lasting, a resort to anything other than depreciation will be a losing proposition,” he argued, warning that aggressively defending the rupee could eventually drain India’s forex reserves. Source: India Today