A Ray of Hope in Gaza: Hamas Move Opens Door to Peace

By Prof. Indrajit S Saluja

The announcement by Hamas that it is prepared to release all remaining Israeli hostages, and that it is willing in principle to accept a ceasefire under the terms laid out by President Trump, is a remarkably hopeful development in a conflict too long drenched in blood and suffering. While serious obstacles remain, this gesture deserves cautious optimism: it opens a door, however narrow, toward renewed negotiation — and possibly toward peace in a land that has known too little of it.

To be sure, these terms are far from trivial. Hamas has committed to a full exchange, stipulating that Israeli hostages — both living and deceased — be released in accordance with Trump’s formula.
In exchange, Israel would free large numbers of Palestinian detainees.
Hamas also signals readiness to relinquish administrative control of Gaza in favor of a neutral Palestinian entity.
And it has voiced openness to a ceasefire.

If carried through, this would mark a pivot from open warfare to negotiation. Such a transition cannot come soon enough: the human and material toll of the Israeli-Hamas conflict has been catastrophic. Since the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023, Israeli sources report over 1,000 deaths on the Israeli side (many civilians) , while Gaza’s health authorities and independent studies put the Palestinian death toll in Gaza at tens of thousands — often cited figures range from 46,000 to over 60,000, with some research estimating at least 64,000 deaths from traumatic injury alone by mid-2024.
Many more have been wounded — over 100,000 in some official counts — and the destruction in Gaza has devastated infrastructure, housing, public services and agriculture.
One recent assessment found that some 78 percent of buildings have been damaged or destroyed.
The displacement of Gazans is nearly universal: in many rounds of conflict, up to 80-90 percent of the population have been uprooted or forced to relocate, with grievously inadequate shelter, sanitation, healthcare, and food security.

But this is not the first such cycle of violence. The Israeli–Palestinian conflict spans back many decades, with wars, uprisings, occupations, intifadas, and repeated attempts at peace (Oslo Accords, Camp David, etc.) that yielded painful compromises and often relapse into conflict.
Gaza in particular has endured multiple wars over the past two decades, including in 2008–09 (Operation Cast Lead), 2014, and subsequent flareups, each one imposing fresh trauma, loss, and demolition.
Over the years, civilian populations — especially in Gaza — have borne disproportionate burdens of blockade, resource deprivation, displacement, and infrastructure collapse.

Thus, the possibility that Hamas might release hostages and consent to a ceasefire under credible terms is not only welcome — it is urgent. It represents an opening, albeit tentative, to break the cycle of military escalation. World leaders must seize this moment. They should urge both Hamas and Israel to uphold their commitments, to verify compliance, and to build confidence toward a lasting peace. Mediators, regional states, and international institutions should facilitate transparency, verification, and phased steps toward disarmament, reconstruction, and reconciliation.

Above all, the most vulnerable in this conflict have long been the Palestinians — ordinary civilians, women and children — who have repeatedly suffered displacement, loss of homes and livelihoods, limited access to water, power, medical care, and education. Any peace must place their dignity and aspirations at its center. A deal that merely halts violence temporarily without addressing the underlying injustices will likely fail. Therefore, this moment should not be wasted: if world leaders encourage and support real negotiation rather than maximalist rhetoric, perhaps a path may yet emerge toward coexistence, reconstruction, and healing in a region that so sorely needs it.

In welcoming Hamas’s statement, one cautiously hopes that both sides are ready — with international support — to turn a page, and that successive steps will bring stability, relief, and justice to millions who have waited too long.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.