The Indian Panorama

Tag: Editorial- Comment

  • America at a Crossroads: Navigating Polarization and Presidential Choices

    By Prof. Indrajit S Saluja

    America stands at a crucial juncture, marked by significant political polarization and an impending presidential election that has many citizens expressing disillusionment with their choices. Over 60% of Americans identify as either Democrats or Republicans, while more than 30% remain independent, aligning loosely with either party. Despite the diversity within each party, certain demographic trends are evident, particularly within the Republican Party, which predominantly consists of White Christians. This composition does not negate the presence of other races and faiths within the party but highlights a noticeable demographic trend. In contrast, the Democratic Party boasts greater racial, religious, and cultural diversity.

    Independent voters, making up more than 30% of the electorate, play a pivotal role in determining election outcomes. Their votes are less influenced by party loyalty and more swayed by the candidates’ programs and visions. As such, these voters hold the key to the final outcome of presidential elections. In recent weeks, sentiments from both common citizens and opinion makers have echoed a profound dissatisfaction with the current presidential candidates. The criticism leveled against them is sharp and revealing.

    One candidate is criticized for evasiveness, dishonesty, and a questionable record of personal and professional conduct. The other candidate faces scrutiny for perceived infirmity, which some argue impairs his ability to communicate effectively. Both have served as one-term presidents, and the general public sentiment leans towards a desire for better choices. Many Americans lament the apparent decline in the caliber of presidential candidates, reminiscing about the days when figures like Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Harry S. Truman, Thomas Jefferson, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, and Barack Obama graced the political stage.

    Despite their perceived inadequacies, both candidates are fervently pursuing the presidency of the United States, a position of immense global significance. Many Americans wish they had the power to disqualify both candidates, seeking instead leaders who truly embody the values and capabilities required for such a critical role. Given that disqualification is not a feasible option, another scenario comes into play, particularly concerning the current Democratic candidate, Joe Biden.

    Joe Biden, the incumbent president, faces increasing calls to withdraw from the race. His recent bout with COVID-19 has kept him in isolation and away from campaigning, further fueling concerns about his health and ability to serve another term. By stepping down, Biden could secure his legacy as a dedicated lawmaker who served the nation admirably for 50 years, first as a senator and then as president. Such a move would not only endear him to the Democratic Party and its supporters but also bolster the chances of a Democrat succeeding him in the presidency.

    Donald Trump, the Republican contender, is not universally beloved within his own party and certainly not favored by many independent voters. A Biden withdrawal could potentially pave the way for a more viable Democratic candidate, thereby diminishing Trump’s chances of reclaiming the presidency. This scenario hinges on Biden recognizing the broader implications of his candidacy for the Democratic Party and the nation. Americans hope Biden has not yet been afflicted with senility so as not to see what lies ahead for him, for Democratic Party and for America, the Greatest Nation on the Earth.

  • Shambhu barricades: Order to open border a win for public, protesters

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order to remove barricades at the Shambhu border marks a significant moment in the ongoing protests by farmers. For over five months, the blockade, set up by the Haryana Government, has caused severe inconvenience to commuters, disrupted local businesses and ignited widespread public frustration. This court order represents a critical step towards restoring normalcy and addressing the grievances of both the protesting farmers and the affected residents. The ruling underscores the importance of balancing the right to peaceful protest with the need to maintaining public order and accessibility. The blockade, which began as a measure to prevent farmers from advancing towards Delhi, had escalated into a roadblock for ordinary citizens. The HC directive to Punjab and Haryana to coordinate the removal of the barriers highlights a judicial acknowledgment of the hardship imposed on the public.

    For the protesting farmers, this ruling is a validation of their stance. As one farmer leader pointed out, the order reveals that the barricades were a state-imposed restriction. This distinction is crucial for altering public perception and countering the narrative that farmers were responsible for the blockade. The Samyukt Kisan Morcha’s plan to discuss their next move shows a continued commitment to peaceful advocacy of their demands.

    As the barricades come down and normal traffic resumes, traders in Ambala, who faced losses due to reduced customer flow, hope for a turn towards economic recovery. Even as both state governments must facilitate a smooth transition, the farmers should ensure that their next steps do not lead to any escalation. This episode highlights the delicate balance required in handling public protests and the need for solutions that respect both civil liberties and public welfare. Dialogue remains the most effective path to resolution.
    (Tribune, India)

  • Navigating the Circus of American Democracy

    Prof. Indrajit Saluja
    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    Politics, as the adage goes, is a game of scoundrels. This sentiment seems to resonate universally, albeit with varying degrees of intensity. Whether one looks at politicians from the most developed nations or those struggling with basic infrastructure, there is a shared perception that politicians constitute a unique and often confounding species. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the United States, where the political landscape often resembles a chaotic circus rather than a beacon of democratic governance.

    As we stand on the cusp of another presidential election in 2024, the American populace finds itself grappling with a disheartening reality: the perceived lack of viable candidates fit for the highest office in the land. With a nation of over 342 million inhabitants, it is indeed perplexing that the choices for the presidency appear underwhelming, if not outright unsuitable.

    The two individuals currently vying for the White House exemplify this dilemma. Their campaigns, rather than inspiring confidence and hope, seem mired in controversy, incompetence, and a dearth of substantive policy proposals. The question naturally arises: how did we, as a nation, arrive at this juncture where the options for our next leader seem so disappointing?

    Firstly, let us acknowledge the broader context of American politics. The electoral process, while ostensibly designed to promote meritocracy and representative governance, often becomes ensnared in partisan bickering, special interests, and the omnipresent influence of money. Candidates spend exorbitant sums on campaigning, turning what should be a platform for discussing pressing issues into a spectacle of mudslinging and character assassination.

    Moreover, the American electorate finds itself increasingly polarized along ideological lines. Issues that should unite the nation—such as healthcare, education, and economic prosperity—become battlegrounds for entrenched political factions. Compromise, once a cornerstone of democratic governance, has become a rare commodity. Instead, political strategy revolves around rallying a base rather than appealing to the broader spectrum of voters.

    In this environment, the quality of candidates often takes a backseat to their ability to mobilize and energize their respective bases. This phenomenon has led to the nomination of candidates who may excel in rhetoric and theatrics but falter when it comes to leadership acumen and a genuine understanding of policy intricacies. Substance gives way to style, and governance becomes a casualty of political expediency.

    The media, too, plays a significant role in shaping public perception of political candidates. The 24-hour news cycle thrives on controversy and sensationalism, often prioritizing headlines over substantive analysis. Candidates who can generate attention, whether through provocative statements or scandalous behavior, receive disproportionate coverage, overshadowing more qualified but less flamboyant contenders.

    Against this backdrop, it is no wonder that disillusionment with the political process runs deep among American voters. Many feel disenfranchised, believing that their voices are drowned out by the cacophony of partisan warfare and media sensationalism. The very notion of public service as a noble calling has been tarnished by the perception of politics as a cynical game played by self-serving opportunists.

    Yet, amidst the gloom and disillusionment, there remains a glimmer of hope. The American democratic system, for all its flaws and shortcomings, possesses a resilience born out of its commitment to principles of freedom, equality, and the rule of law. The way forward lies not in despairing over the current state of affairs but in actively participating in the democratic process.

    Citizens must demand accountability from their elected representatives, holding them to the highest standards of integrity and competence. Grassroots movements and civic engagement can serve as catalysts for change, promoting a more inclusive and responsive political culture. Furthermore, reforms aimed at reducing the influence of money in politics and fostering greater transparency are essential to restoring faith in democratic institutions.

    Education also plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of American politics. A well-informed electorate is better equipped to discern between genuine leadership and empty promises. Civic education programs in schools can cultivate a sense of civic duty and empower young people to become active participants in shaping their communities and their country’s future.

    Ultimately, the path to reclaiming the integrity of American politics requires a collective effort. It demands that we transcend partisan divides and reaffirm our commitment to the principles upon which this nation was founded. It necessitates a reevaluation of our priorities as voters and a rejection of the politics of division in favor of a politics of unity and common purpose. As we approach the upcoming presidential election, let us not resign ourselves to the belief that politics is irredeemably broken. Instead, let us recognize the power inherent in our democratic institutions and our ability, as citizens, to effect meaningful change. The circus of American politics may be chaotic and disheartening at times, but it remains within our power to steer it towards a future defined by integrity, competence, and the common good.

  • Making a mark: Rahul sets the tone for Opposition

    Some of Rahul Gandhi’s searing remarks aimed at the Bharatiya Janata Party, made during his maiden speech as the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, have been expunged. Truth is truth, he retorted, ‘I said what I had to say, that is the truth.’ Animated speeches and acrimonious exchanges are part and parcel of parliamentary proceedings. A discernible change in the inaugural session of the 18th Lok Sabha is the Opposition’s new-found confidence. Numerically strong after 10 years and finally with an LoP, the leaders seem determined to exhibit a sense of purpose and make it a stage of equals. It’s too early to form opinions, but the first few sittings have been a far cry from the days when the Opposition voices would get drowned in the cacophonic domination of the Treasury Benches.

    In his counterstrike, the Prime Minister said the Congress got 99 out of 543 seats, not out of 100, questioning its aggressive mode in Parliament. To Rahul Gandhi’s credit, he has set the tone for the Opposition. He and others in the INDIA bloc may well pat themselves on the back for having made a mark. An Opposition speaking truth to power and picking up holes in policies infuses much-needed vigor in the quest for accountability in governance. A caveat persists. Facts are sacrosanct. Oppose, for sure, but only when backed by evidence and research, not hearsay. Else, the best of presentations can get reduced to an exercise in self-indulgence.

    Be strong, do not fear — that’s been the recurring theme in the Opposition ranks after the energizing election results. When any of them has an iota of self-doubt, they must always remember who they have in their corner — the redoubtable, feisty Mahua Moitra is a force to reckon with.

    (Tribune, India)

  • An Uncertain Future for America : On Presidential Election

    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    On this 4th of July, as the United States celebrates its 248th Independence Day, the nation finds itself at a crossroads, faced with an uncertain political future. The recent presidential debate highlighted the stark inadequacies of both candidates vying for the highest office in the land. One candidate struggled to articulate his points clearly and effectively, leaving many to question his capability to lead. The other candidate, in an attempt to evade direct questions, digressed from the issues at hand and seemed more intent on hoodwinking the American people rather than providing substantive answers.

    This situation has left Americans with a profound dilemma: which of these two seemingly incompetent candidates should they entrust with the future of their country? The committed cadres of both major parties are unlikely to shift their loyalties, leaving the decision largely in the hands of independent voters, who traditionally play a decisive role in such closely contested elections.

    According to Pew Research, about two-thirds of registered voters identify with a political party, with the electorate roughly split between Republicans (32%) and Democrats (33%). The remaining third identify as independents or something else, though most of these voters lean toward one of the two major parties. This significant proportion of independents is poised to determine the outcome of the election, given the nearly equal split among the committed partisans.

    President Biden’s performance in the first preferential debate was widely seen as dismal and disappointing. This poor showing is likely to alienate many independent voters, who may disapprove of Biden’s capabilities. However, this disapproval does not automatically translate into support for the Republican candidate, Donald Trump. Many independents have not forgotten Trump’s unethical conduct during his previous tenure, and his extreme views on various issues remain unpalatable to a significant segment of the electorate, particularly liberal voters.

    Faced with this choice, it appears that many independent voters might choose to abstain from voting altogether, finding neither candidate worthy of their support. This potential voter apathy presents a serious challenge to both campaigns, particularly for the Democrats if Biden remains their nominee.

    Should Biden decide to withdraw from the race, the introduction of a new, well-known candidate could change the dynamics considerably. Independent voters, often driven by a desire for competent and ethical leadership, might be more inclined to support a fresh face, especially if they perceive the new candidate as a viable alternative to the status quo.

    However, identifying a suitable alternative to Biden is fraught with complications. The current political landscape is such that no strong and recognizable second-in-command exists within the Democratic Party, despite there being a constitutionally designated vice president. Party leaders, while active in legislative circles, lack broad public recognition. Even popular Democratic governors, who have demonstrated excellent leadership within their states, remain relatively unknown on a national level.

    Introducing a new candidate would require an immense effort to elevate their profile among the electorate, particularly the crucial independent voters. This endeavor would also necessitate substantial financial backing, an area where Trump already enjoys significant support from his promoters and financiers. For a new Democratic candidate, mobilizing sufficient campaign funds quickly would be a daunting task, presenting a clear disadvantage.

    As we wait to see how these political dynamics unfold, there is speculation that Biden’s health could play a role in his potential withdrawal from the race. Should his physicians find a health issue that necessitates rest, it could provide Biden with an honorable exit, allowing the Democratic Party to present a new candidate without the stigma of a forced resignation.

    Ultimately, the health of American democracy and the freedom of its people depend on a fair and competent election process. As we celebrate this 4th of July, it is crucial to reflect on the values that underpin our nation and hope for a resolution that upholds these principles. The coming months will be critical in determining the future direction of the United States, and it is imperative that we remain vigilant and engaged in the democratic process.

    As we celebrate this Independence Day, let us not only commemorate the freedoms we cherish but also commit to ensuring that our political system remains robust and capable of serving the best interests of all Americans. Let us hope for leaders who embody the ideals of competence, integrity, and a genuine commitment to the well-being of the nation.

    Happy 4th of July!

  • A lack luster debate : Americans are disappointed in both Biden and Trump

    Prof. Indrajit Saluja
    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    The first presidential debate between President Biden and Former President Donald Trump was anticipated to be a pivotal moment in the 2024 election season, yet what unfolded left many observers disheartened and disillusioned. One couldn’t believe one’s eyes and ears s watching and listening to the so-called debate between the two candidates. It was, to put it very simply and succinctly, a lackluster debate.

    President Biden’s performance was notably unsteady. Throughout the evening, he struggled to articulate his thoughts clearly, often appearing to fumble for expressions. His voice, usually a symbol of authority, faltered at times, betraying a lack of conviction and confidence. When questioned about his capabilities at his age, his response failed to reassure listeners of his fitness to lead. The moment underscored concerns about his readiness to take on the demanding role of President of the United States.

    In contrast, Donald Trump exuded more self-assurance and appeared more in command of himself. He navigated through answers more fluidly, readily finding words to support his points. However, Trump’s approach was not without its flaws. He frequently evaded direct answers, particularly concerning his commitment to accepting election results and condemning violence following the election outcome. Despite his confident demeanor, Trump’s tendency to sidestep crucial issues left some viewers questioning the depth of his commitment to democratic principles.

    Throughout the debate, Trump leaned heavily on praising his own presidency, highlighting accomplishments while criticizing Biden for perceived reversals of these gains. His strategy, though effective in rallying his base, did little to broaden his appeal beyond his core supporters. While Trump appeared more assertive on stage, his propensity to embellish achievements and dodge critical questions left many undecided voters grappling with uncertainties.

    The reactions from both camps following the debate were telling. Democrats expressed disappointment in Biden’s performance, hoping for a more compelling display of leadership qualities and policy vision. Conversely, Trump supporters celebrated what they perceived as a strong showing by their candidate, convinced that he had outperformed Biden decisively. The stark contrast in reactions underscored the deepening divide within American politics, where perceptions of debate performance often reinforce existing partisan beliefs rather than sway undecided voters.

    Yet, beyond the partisan fervor and disappointment lies a broader sentiment among many Americans: a sense of disillusionment with the quality of presidential candidates offered. The debate highlighted not only the weaknesses of the individual candidates but also the shortcomings of a political system that seems to struggle in presenting truly inspiring and unifying leadership choices.

    Many Americans expressed a yearning for alternative candidates who could offer fresh perspectives and genuine solutions to the country’s challenges. The spectacle of the debate, with its lack of substantive discourse and evasion of critical issues, reinforced the perception that neither Biden nor Trump fully embodies the qualities needed to lead effectively in these tumultuous times.

  • Whither American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) ?

    Prof. Indrajit Saluja
    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    The American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI) has grown from strength to strength since its inception in 1982. Through its dedication to medical education, healthcare advancement, social involvement, and cultural promotion, AAPI has become a cornerstone of support and leadership within the medical community. The organization’s contributions extend far beyond clinical practice, encompassing education, research, advocacy, and humanitarian efforts that enrich the lives of its members and the communities they serve. As AAPI continues to evolve, it remains committed to its founding principles of excellence, service, and collaboration, ensuring a brighter and healthier future for generations to come.

    AAPI has undoubtedly faced its share of challenges and internal strife despite its commendable achievements and contributions to the medical community. Over the years, as the organization grew in size, influence, and financial stability, it also became a battleground for internal politics and power struggles. This has resulted in a stark division within AAPI, with competing factions vying for control and influence within the organization.

    The competition for leadership positions and influence has unfortunately overshadowed the core mission and objectives with which AAPI was originally founded. Instead of focusing on service to the community, professional excellence, and advocacy for healthcare issues, some members have been engaged in bitter rivalries that have led to animosity and division.

    At present, AAPI finds itself at a critical juncture, with significant discord between opposing camps within the organization. This internal strife has not only tarnished the organization’s reputation but also undermined its effectiveness in serving its members and the broader healthcare community. The atmosphere of conflict and mistrust detracts from the noble goals of AAPI and hampers its ability to fulfill its mission of promoting health, education, and cultural understanding.

    It is imperative that influential members of AAPI intervene to mediate and reconcile the warring factions. Leaders within the organization must emphasize the importance of unity, professionalism, and mutual respect. They should remind all members of their shared commitment to serving the community through their professional skills and dedication to patient care.

    There is a pressing need for a cultural shift within AAPI towards fostering a supportive and collaborative environment. Instead of viewing leadership positions as trophies to be won or sources of power, members should prioritize collective goals and cooperative efforts to advance healthcare and educational initiatives.

    Addressing the internal divisions requires a concerted effort to promote transparency, accountability, and inclusivity within AAPI. Open dialogue, constructive engagement, and adherence to ethical standards are essential to rebuilding trust and restoring the organization’s integrity.

    To heal from the current discord, AAPI members must rise above personal ambitions and factional interests. They must embrace a higher sense of responsibility towards the organization’s founding principles and the greater good of the communities they serve. This includes advocating for healthcare policies, supporting professional development, and actively participating in community outreach programs without the distraction of internal conflicts.

    While AAPI has faced internal challenges and divisions, it possesses the resilience and potential to overcome these obstacles. By prioritizing unity, professionalism, and service to the community, AAPI can reclaim its reputation as a leading advocate for physicians of Indian origin in the United States. It is time for honorable physicians within AAPI to reflect on their shared values, mend their internal divisions, and reaffirm their commitment to excellence in healthcare and cultural enrichment. Only through collective efforts and mutual respect can AAPI continue to thrive and uphold its vital mission in the years to come.

  • Unwarranted arrest: on the case of Arvind Kejriwal

    Timing of Kejriwal’s arrest hints at bad faith, eagerness to deny him freedom

    The arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal by the CBI in the Delhi excise policy corruption case is unwarranted and appears tainted by bad faith. It was effected just before the Supreme Court of India was due to hear an appeal against a Delhi High Court order that had stayed the bail granted to him by a lower court in a money-laundering case related to the same allegation. The High Court had stalled his release on a plea by the Enforcement Directorate, but reserved its detailed order. The Supreme Court had deferred its hearing to June 26 to await the outcome. However, the High Court, by a detailed order, formalized the stay on the grant of bail. On June 26 morning, the CBI effected his formal arrest and sought his custody for interrogation in a CBI court. It is quite strange that it decided on this particular day and circumstance to formally arrest someone who has been in custody since March 21, save for a brief interlude during which he was granted interim bail. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that the sole purpose was to deny him the possibility of freedom, if the Court had restored the bail order.

    The allegation that Mr. Kejriwal was a beneficiary as well as a prime mover behind the controversial excise policy that allegedly procured windfall profits for favored liquor manufacturers is quite serious. However, the investigation has been going on for nearly two years, and suspects have been arrested from time to time. The evidence largely consists of statements made by accused persons who were subsequently granted pardon and made approvers. In these circumstances, the vacation judge who granted bail in the money-laundering case came to a reasonable conclusion that someone cannot be indefinitely incarcerated in the hope that a money trail and direct evidence would soon emerge to justify the action. Unfortunately, the High Court concluded that this verdict was arrived at without considering the entire material available and without affording sufficient opportunity to the prosecution. The picture of an accused having to go from the lowest to the highest court for bail and facing favorable and adverse orders alternately reflects poorly on a system that has been weaponized by the current regime to target political opponents. A truly impartial agency should not rush to arrest anyone, leave alone those holding high political office, but instead approach the trial court with a strong and well-documented case, and leave it to the courts to decide on the guilt or innocence of the accused. Mr. Kejriwal, on his part, should have resigned immediately on arrest to avoid the perception he could influence witnesses or tamper with the evidence.
    (The Hindu)

  • Devesh Chandra Thakur, MP-elect  needs to be disciplined for his discriminatory statement

    Prof. Indrajit Saluja
    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    The oath of office taken by a new Member of Parliament (MP) in India is not merely a procedural formality but a solemn commitment to uphold the highest standards of democratic principles, equality, and justice. When an individual assumes office as an MP, they pledge to serve their constituents without any discrimination and to uphold the Constitution of India, which is the bedrock of our nation’s democratic framework.

    The oath, mandated by the Third Schedule of the Constitution of India, emphasizes the MP’s duty to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution, to faithfully discharge their duties, and to do right to all manner of people in accordance with the Constitution and the law. It is a clear directive that MPs are duty-bound to represent and serve all constituents irrespective of caste, creed, religion, or socio-economic status.

    However, recent remarks made by Devesh Chandra Thakur, MP-elect from the Sitamarhi Lok Sabha seat, have brought into question his commitment to this oath. His statement openly declaring that Muslims and Yadavs did not vote for him and that he will not attend to their “personal work” is not just a political faux pas but a violation of the core principles enshrined in the Constitution. Such statements undermine the very essence of democratic representation and equality before the law.

    The Constitution of India guarantees every citizen the right to vote freely and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. By suggesting that certain groups of voters are not deserving of his attention or support based on their demographic characteristics, Thakur has not only betrayed the trust of those who voted for him but also violated the principles of equality and non-discrimination that MPs are sworn to uphold.

    In response to such egregious violations of the oath of office, there is a legitimate call for parliamentary action. Parliament has the responsibility to uphold the integrity of its members and the sanctity of the oath they take. This includes considering measures such as suspension or censure for MPs who fail to adhere to the principles outlined in their oath. The judiciary, too, plays a crucial role in ensuring that such violations are addressed in accordance with the law and the Constitution.

    The  condemnation of Thakur’s statements should be unanimous and unequivocal. Leaders across party lines, civil society, and the public at large must speak out against any attempt to undermine the foundational values of our democracy. The freedom to choose representatives without coercion or discrimination is a fundamental right that must be safeguarded at all costs.

    It is imperative that actions speak louder than words in upholding the sanctity of the oath of office. The repercussions of allowing such statements to go unchecked are profound. They erode public trust in democratic institutions and perpetuate divisions within society based on identity politics rather than merit and governance.

    As custodians of democracy, we must ensure that such violations are not tolerated and that the rule of law prevails for the collective benefit of all citizens.

  • New dynamics: On the G-7, its identity, its purpose

    G-7 must review its own purpose in a rapidly changing world

    Welcoming leaders of 10 countries including Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the “G-7 Outreach” Summit, Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said it was important to step away from the old trope of the “West vs the Rest”. That sentiment explained Italy’s decision to invite mainly the Global South countries including BRICS notables such as Brazil, India, and the UAE, to hold an outreach with seven African countries on energy issues, and to host the summit in the Mediterranean Apulia region. The G-7 was once hailed as a dynamic group of the world’s most developed democracies where heads of state would roll up their sleeves once a year to effect real solutions to global financial and development issues. However, with manufacturing slowdowns, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and western sanctions, the grouping has appeared more tired, and its meetings less effective. The shaky electoral fortunes of most of the G-7 leadership did not enhance that image at the summit. The joint communiqué read more like a laundry list of the world’s problems than it did as a strong call to action on resolving them. Most salient was the G-7’s continued “military, budget, humanitarian, and reconstruction support” for Ukraine, but with no constructive plan on how to end the war. A Gaza ceasefire appeal has also not been accepted by Israel. The G-7’s focus on China in the Indo-Pacific and on “industrial targeting” and unfair practices was particularly sharp, but it remains to be seen whether any member-country will reduce its own considerable trade ties with Beijing. A line in the communiqué that recommitted to about eight infrastructure corridors, including the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor, reinforced the lack of focus on executing (as distinct from discussing) projects.

    Given the G-7’s current situation, India, in attendance for the eleventh time, could well take stock of the engagement’s utility. While the event was an opportune moment for Mr. Modi, now in his third term, to meet with some of the world’s top leadership, the meetings themselves did not yield many outcomes. Formal bilaterals with the leaders of important partner the U.S., and fractious relationship-ridden Canada, did not materialize. Mr. Modi focused on India’s elections as a “victory for the democratic world”, on the importance of harnessing technology and artificial intelligence to bridge global inequalities, and on the value of the Global South, especially Africa. It would seem most of those issues would be better addressed in a larger and more representational format such as the G-20, while the G-7 may wish to review its own identity and purpose amidst a rapidly changing global power dynamic.

    (The Hindu)

  • Priyanka’s poll debut: Congress takes right call to field her from Wayanad

    The Congress’ encouraging performance in the recent Lok Sabha elections has prompted former party president Rahul Gandhi to retain the Raebareli Lok Sabha seat in Uttar Pradesh and vacate the one in Wayanad, Kerala. His sister, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, who was appointed Congress general secretary in 2019, will make her electoral debut in the Wayanad bypoll. The grand old party, which had been reduced to a nonentity in UP, made a comeback in the 2024 parliamentary polls in alliance with the Samajwadi Party (SP). The Congress bagged six seats, including the Gandhi family bastions of Raebareli and Amethi. Priyanka is believed to have played a key role in helping the party win the two prestigious seats, especially Amethi, where Rahul had suffered a shock defeat in 2019.

    It is obvious that the Congress wants to build on the gains made in UP and actively assist the Akhilesh Yadav-led SP in dislodging the ruling BJP in the 2027 Assembly elections. Rahul’s long-term presence in the state is a must to energize the party rank and file. For the record, the Congress had hit a new low in the 2022 Assembly polls, winning just two seats in the state with the highest political stakes.

    Having made major inroads into the South in recent years, the Congress has chosen a presumably easy seat for Priyanka. The Congress-led United Democratic Front swept the Lok Sabha polls in Kerala, winning 18 of the 20 seats, even as the BJP managed to open its account. Both the BJP and the CPI have trained their guns on Rahul, alleging that he did not inform voters of Wayanad beforehand about his plan to contest from two constituencies. Nevertheless, the Congress is confident that the electorate of this constituency will send another Gandhi to Parliament, that too a first-timer, thus strengthening the resurgent Opposition.

    (Tribune, India)

  • Arundhati Roy’s sanctioned Prosecution reflects increasingly repressive environment for dissenting voices in India

    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    The harassment of social activists in India continues unabated, with the latest development involving the sanctioning of prosecution against renowned writer and social activist Arundhati Roy under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). This move, authorized by the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, is a troubling reflection of the increasingly repressive environment for dissenting voices in the country.

    The FIR against Roy and another individual, Sheikh Showkat Hussain, was filed following an order from the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi. The charges stem from their alleged participation in a conference titled “Azadi — The Only Way” held in 2010 at the LTG Auditorium on Copernicus Marg, New Delhi. At this conference, the speakers reportedly made provocative speeches that advocated for the separation of Kashmir from India, a highly contentious issue that has long been a flashpoint in Indian politics.

    This case highlights several critical issues concerning freedom of speech and the treatment of activists in India. Firstly, it underscores the misuse of draconian laws like the UAPA to stifle dissent. The UAPA, originally intended to combat terrorism, has increasingly been used to target activists, journalists, and intellectuals whose views diverge from the official narrative. The application of such severe legislation to prosecute a writer and academic for their speech at a public conference raises serious questions about the commitment of Indian authorities to uphold democratic principles and human rights.

    Arundhati Roy, an internationally acclaimed author and outspoken critic of the Indian government’s policies, has faced numerous legal challenges and public attacks for her views, particularly regarding Kashmir. Her participation in the “Azadi — The Only Way” conference is part of her broader engagement with the Kashmir issue, where she has consistently advocated for the right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir. While her stance is controversial and has attracted significant opposition, the use of UAPA against her is disproportionate and suggests a deliberate attempt to silence her voice.

    The charges against Roy and Hussain also bring to light the broader context of shrinking space for civil society in India. In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the harassment, intimidation, and arrest of activists, journalists, and scholars. Many have been accused of sedition or terrorism-related charges, often based on flimsy evidence or for merely expressing dissenting opinions. This pattern indicates a worrying trend towards authoritarianism, where dissent is not tolerated, and critical voices are systematically suppressed.

    Additionally, the timing of the FIR and the subsequent prosecution raises questions about the motives behind these actions. The conference in question took place in 2010, and the FIR was filed many years later. This delay suggests that the charges may be politically motivated, aiming to discredit and neutralize critics of the government. It also reflects a broader strategy of using legal harassment as a tool to deter other activists and intellectuals from speaking out.

    The issue of Kashmir remains a highly sensitive and polarizing subject in India. The region has experienced decades of conflict, violence, and political turmoil. While the Indian government maintains that Kashmir is an integral part of India, many Kashmiris and some Indian activists argue for greater autonomy or independence for the region. The government’s response to these calls has often been heavy-handed, involving military action, curfews, and restrictions on civil liberties. The prosecution of Roy and Hussain can be seen as part of this broader strategy to control the narrative on Kashmir and silence those who challenge the official stance.

    It is imperative for the Indian government to recognize that true democracy thrives on diverse opinions and robust debate. The use of draconian laws to stifle dissent only serves to undermine the democratic fabric of the nation. Instead of prosecuting activists like Arundhati Roy and Sheikh Showkat Hussain, the government should engage in constructive dialogue with all stakeholders, including those with differing views on contentious issues like Kashmir.

  • NEET controversy: Ensure quick resolution, restore trust

    The controversy over allegations of paper leak and malpractices in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) needs quick resolution. The Supreme Court may have refused to stay the counselling for admissions to medical colleges, but confusion and anxiety persist. The Bench’s observation that the sanctity of the entrance test has been affected puts the onus on the National Testing Agency (NTA) to come clean. It must answer the litany of questions regarding the alleged irregularities. Over 22 lakh candidates took the test, which is considered a gateway to a career in medicine. Conducting an exercise of such magnitude demands extreme caution and responsibility. The slightest laxity or an error of judgement can affect the fortunes of thousands of candidates. The NTA has to clear doubts, allay fears and restore trust.

    The fairness of the process is the cornerstone of any examination. In the region, a recurring theme is the uncertainty regarding the impartiality of recruitment tests. Haryana, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh have been rocked by cheating scams. In Uttar Pradesh, the police constable recruitment exam had to be cancelled just days after it was conducted in February after confirmation of a paper leak. Stringent legislation has been introduced in some states to deal with paper leaks and recruitment scams, but a strategy of deterrence can only work through firm follow-up action. Having clean, competent officers at the helm is a basic necessity.

    The apex court is yet to take a final decision on the NEET-UG issue, but voices of protest are expected to get shriller. As a four-member committee formed by the NTA looks at the options to defuse the crisis, also expected would be a set of recommendations to ensure there’s no repeat of the fiasco.

  • Long-delayed justice Tag line: Punjab ex-cops jailed for 1993 staged killing

    In a significant verdict on Friday, June 14, a CBI court in Mohali sentenced former Punjab Police DIG Dilbagh Singh to seven years of rigorous imprisonment and ex-DSP Gurbachan Singh to life imprisonment for their roles in the 1993 fake encounter killing of Gulshan Kumar, a fruit vendor. This case, a chilling reminder of the dark days of unbridled police brutality in Punjab, highlights the systemic lapses that had plagued the state. Extrajudicial killings, illegal detentions and staged encounters had become distressingly common. The details of this case are harrowing. On June 22, 1993, Gulshan, along with his father and brothers, was abducted by a police team led by Dilbagh and Gurbachan. While the others were released, Gulshan was kept in illegal custody for a month before being killed in a staged encounter. His body was cremated as ‘unclaimed’, a common practice then to cover up extrajudicial killings. The case, initially overlooked, was taken up by the CBI in 1995 on the Supreme Court’s directive, culminating in the conviction nearly three decades later.

    The law has at last been catching up with rogue cops. In September 2023, three ex-officers received the life sentence for the 1992 fake encounter killing of three youths. A year before that, a retired sub-inspector was sentenced to 10 years in another fake encounter in 1992. These cases reveal a pattern of grave misconduct and long-overdue comeuppance.

    The delivery of justice underscores the resilience of the victims’ families amid numerous challenges, including the death of several accused during the trial and witness attrition. This is crucial for restoring faith in the rule of law and can serve as a deterrent against abuse of power.
    (Tribune, India)

  • Democracy Prevails: Reflections on India’s 2024 General Elections

    By Prof. Indrajit S. Saluja

    In a resounding testament to the resilience of democracy, India’s 2024 General Elections bore witness to a pivotal moment in the nation’s political landscape. After a decade marked by soaring rhetoric, unfulfilled promises, and growing disillusionment, the electorate delivered a clear verdict, signaling a shift away from the status quo.

    For ten years, the Modi government captivated the imagination of the Indian populace with grand visions and lofty assurances. However, as time unfolded, these promises remained largely unfulfilled, leaving the marginalized and impoverished masses stranded in a sea of dashed hopes. Instead of uplifting the downtrodden, the government seemed to prioritize the interests of the elite, fostering a growing chasm between the haves and the have-nots.

    Buoyed by a meticulously cultivated image and an extensive propaganda machinery, the Modi government appeared convinced that electoral victory was a foregone conclusion. Slogans like “Modi hai to mumkin hai” (With Modi, anything is possible) and “Modi Ki Guarantee” failed to resonate with a populace weary of rhetoric devoid of tangible results. Even the once potent force of Hindutva, which had propelled the BJP to victory in 2019, lost its grip on the collective consciousness of the electorate.

    The BJP’s overconfidence was palpable, exemplified by their audacious declaration of securing more than 400 seats in the parliament—a stark departure from reality. Prime Minister Modi’s dismissive stance towards the opposition, particularly the Indian National Congress, further underscored the party’s disconnect from ground realities.

    However, the political landscape took an unexpected turn as a formidable coalition of opposition parties emerged, united in their resolve to challenge the hegemony of the ruling party. This coalition deftly leveraged the grievances of the common people, effectively shifting the narrative from personality politics to issues that truly mattered to the electorate.

    At the heart of this electoral upheaval lay the fundamental principles of democracy and constitutional governance. Faced with the erosion of democratic norms and the casual disregard for constitutional institutions by the ruling dispensation, a sense of urgency permeated the political discourse. The opposition, recognizing the imminent threat to the very fabric of Indian democracy, rallied together with a singular purpose—to safeguard the principles enshrined in the constitution.

    The significance of a robust opposition in a democratic framework cannot be overstated. It serves as a vital check on the excesses of those in power, ensuring accountability and transparency in governance. In rallying behind the opposition coalition, the electorate reaffirmed their commitment to the ideals of democracy, signaling a collective desire for change and renewal.

    The outcome of the 2024 General Elections represents a decisive moment in India’s democratic journey. By thwarting the seemingly invincible juggernaut of the ruling party, the electorate has demonstrated their inherent power to shape the course of their nation’s destiny. In halting the unchecked march of the Modi-led BJP, India has reaffirmed its status as a vibrant and pluralistic democracy, where the voice of the people reigns supreme.

    As the dust settles on the electoral battlefield, a renewed sense of optimism pervades the nation. The prospect of a strengthened democracy, bolstered by a vigilant opposition, offers hope for a brighter future. While the challenges ahead are manifold, the resilience of India’s democratic institutions and the unwavering spirit of its people serve as beacons of hope in an uncertain world.

    The  2024 General Election stands as a testament to the enduring power of democracy—a triumph of the collective will over entrenched power dynamics. As the nation embarks on a new chapter in its political journey, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to upholding the principles of democracy, ensuring that the voice of every citizen is heard and respected.

  • Implications of Donald Trump’s Conviction

    Prof. Indrajit Saluja
    Prof. Indrajit Saluja

    Now that Donald Trump is convicted on all 34 counts in the Stormy Daniels hush money case, it is undoubtedly a historic moment in American politics. The conviction marks the first time a former President of the United States has been convicted on felony charges. The significance of this conviction cannot be overstated, as it would shake the foundations of the American political landscape.

    For the American nation and its people, such a conviction is likely to deepen the already existing divides. Trump’s supporters might view the conviction as politically motivated persecution, while his detractors could see it as a validation of their concerns about his conduct in office. The impact on political ethics in America would be profound, as it would raise questions about the accountability of those in power and the extent to which the rule of law applies equally to everyone.

    Internationally, the conviction of a former U.S. president on felony charges would undoubtedly be met with scrutiny and interest. It could impact America’s standing on the global stage and raise questions about the integrity of its political system.

    In terms of its impact on future elections, the conviction would likely have significant ramifications. Whether Trump, as a felon, could and should seek election as President in 2024 would become a matter of heated debate. Some might argue that his conviction disqualifies him from holding public office, while others could rally behind him as a victim of political persecution.

    The issue would undoubtedly contribute to further political polarization, with both sides digging in their heels and viewing the conviction through the lens of their existing beliefs. This polarization could lead to increased distrust in the law of the land and the judicial system, as people on both sides question the fairness and impartiality of the legal process.

    In such a scenario, it would be crucial for Americans to remember the importance of upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law. Regardless of one’s political beliefs, a functioning democracy relies on the accountability of its leaders and the integrity of its institutions. The conviction of a former president is a stark reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to the rule of law in the highest echelons of power.

    Ultimately, Donald Trump’s conviction in the Stormy Daniels hush money case raises profound questions about the state of American democracy, the integrity of its political institutions, and the future of its political landscape.

  • Addressing the Growing Crisis of Mental Health: The Role of Yoga in Cultivating Well-being

    Prof. Indrajit Saluja
    Prof. Indrajit Saluja

    In recent years, the issue of mental health has emerged as a pressing concern worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), depression is the leading cause of disability globally, affecting over 264 million people of all ages. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing mental health challenges, with increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression reported across populations. As we grapple with this growing crisis, it is imperative to explore holistic approaches to mental well-being, including the ancient practice of yoga.

    Mental health issues can arise from a myriad of factors, including genetic predispositions, traumatic experiences, societal pressures, and environmental stressors. In today’s fast-paced world, individuals often find themselves overwhelmed by the demands of modern life, leading to burnout, anxiety disorders, and depression. Moreover, the stigma surrounding mental illness can prevent individuals from seeking help, exacerbating their symptoms and perpetuating the cycle of suffering.

    While medical interventions such as therapy and medication play a crucial role in managing mental health conditions, there is a growing recognition of the importance of holistic approaches that address the interconnectedness of mind, body, and spirit. This is where the ancient Indian practice of yoga comes into play.

    Yoga is more than just a physical exercise; it is a holistic discipline that integrates breath control, meditation, and physical postures to promote overall well-being. At its core, yoga emphasizes the cultivation of self-awareness, inner peace, and harmony with one’s surroundings. By fostering a deep connection between the mind, body, and soul, yoga offers a powerful tool for managing stress, alleviating symptoms of anxiety and depression, and promoting resilience in the face of adversity.

    Research has shown that regular practice of yoga can have profound effects on mental health. Studies have found that yoga interventions can reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD, as well as improve quality of life and overall psychological well-being. Moreover, yoga has been shown to regulate the body’s stress response system, lowering levels of cortisol and promoting relaxation.

    One of the key strengths of yoga lies in its adaptability and accessibility. Whether practiced in a traditional studio setting or in the comfort of one’s own home, yoga offers a range of techniques that can be tailored to individual needs and preferences. From gentle, restorative practices to more dynamic, physically challenging sequences, there is a style of yoga suitable for everyone, regardless of age, fitness level, or prior experience.

    Additionally, yoga promotes a supportive and inclusive community that encourages self-acceptance, compassion, and connection with others. By fostering a sense of belonging and mutual respect, yoga helps to combat feelings of isolation and alienation, which are common contributors to poor mental health.

    As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, it’s essential to prioritize mental health and well-being as integral components of overall health. By embracing holistic approaches such as yoga, we can cultivate resilience, inner peace, and vitality, empowering ourselves to lead fulfilling and meaningful lives. In the words of B.K.S. Iyengar, one of the foremost yoga teachers of the 20th century, “Yoga is a light, which once lit, will never dim. The better your practice, the brighter the flame.” Let us harness the transformative power of yoga to illuminate the path towards mental well-being for all.

  • Powerful symbolic value: On the recognition of Palestine

    The recognition of Palestine by more nations is an indictment of Israel

    The announcement by Ireland, Norway, and Spain, of their intent to formally recognize the state of Palestine, next week, is one more important sign of the changing tide of international opinion that Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cannot afford to ignore. In just the past month, in the UN General Assembly, 143 countries, including India, passed a resolution calling for the recognition of the Palestinian state by the UN Security Council, where the U.S. has vetoed such a move. Earlier this week, the International Criminal Court Prosecutor moved applications for arrest warrants for Mr. Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for operations after October 7 in Gaza as well as the Hamas leadership for the terror attack that killed 1,200 in Israel, terming these as “war crimes”. On May 24, the International Court of Justice will pronounce another verdict in the petition by South Africa calling for additional measures in the prosecution of Israel for “genocide”. The latest decision by the three countries, that have been vocal in their criticism of Israel — they join eight EU members that have already recognized Palestinian statehood — may not materially change the situation on the ground. But it is meant to be what the Irish Taoiseach Simon Harris referred to as an “act of powerful political and symbolic value” to Israel, especially as it essays what could be the “final assault” on Rafah. While practically every country has condemned Hamas’s terror attacks, Mr. Harris said it would be a mistake to ignore the legitimate Palestinian government in the West Bank, saying that “Hamas is not the Palestinian people”. Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said that the move aimed to support “moderate forces that are on a retreating front in a protracted and cruel conflict”. Spain’s action followed its denial of port facilities to a Danish-flagged ship with explosive material from India meant for Israel, which it said was a firm policy now. Israel’s response, however, has been to recall its envoys and summon the envoys of all three countries for a dressing down.

    In the immediate future, the multiple messages of near-global consensus are meant to push Israel’s government to rethink its plans for Rafah, to stop more civilian losses, and to allow humanitarian aid free access into Gaza. But in the longer term, they are meant to remind Mr. Netanyahu that even if he has disassociated himself from the “two-state solution”, this is something the world believes is the road map to peace. By turning deaf to these messages, Mr. Netanyahu is only furthering his isolation, especially from an international community that came out in full sympathy on October 7, but has grown increasingly horrified by the military campaign since then.

    (The Hindu)

     

  • Spice Crisis: Contamination Hits India’s Global Market

    The recent ban on Indian spices, imposed by Singapore, Hong Kong, Maldives, Australia, and Nepal due to alleged contamination of ethylene oxide (ETO) in products of popular brands MDH and Everest, could potentially reduce spice exports by up to 40 per cent, as warned by the Federation of Indian Spice Stakeholders. The presence of ETO, a toxic chemical, beyond permissible limits in spice mixes poses severe health risks, including cancer. This alarming development underscores the urgent need for India to enhance its food safety protocols and restore global confidence in its spice exports.

    India’s pre-eminence as the world’s largest producer, consumer and exporter of spices is at stake. The country exports over $4 billion worth of spices annually, and its domestic market is valued at $10 billion. Yet, recurring quality concerns have dented this reputation, jeopardizing a sector that significantly contributes to the economy. In 2014, lead was found in the food coloring used in spices like chili and curry powder. The US FDA has rejected 14.5 per cent of MDH spice shipments since 2021 due to bacterial contamination. Last month, authorities in Gujarat seized over 60,000 kg of adulterated spices.

    Considering the serious health risks, it cannot be business as usual in the spice industry. The Indian government has responded with stricter quality controls, expanding inspections across manufacturing units. However, these steps must translate into tangible results and mitigation of further damage, for food quality affects everybody. People need reassurance that the spices they consume are safe. Nobody can be allowed to play with their health. Surprisingly, the government has failed to send out a message to consumers that the companies at fault are being scrutinized. They are left wondering whether they should consume spices. Transparent operations and proactive communication with international regulators are essential to safeguard our spice legacy.

    (Tribune, India)

  • Anti-BJP protests : Candidates facing farmers’ ire in Punjab

    The crackdown on protesting farmers at the Shambhu border in February is casting a shadow on the BJP’s poll campaign in Punjab. Party leaders and candidates are being shown black flags and stopped from entering villages, particularly in Malwa and Majha. These disruptions prompted state BJP chief Sunil Jakhar to lodge a complaint with the state’s Chief Electoral Officer last week, alleging that the AAP government had failed to ensure a level playing field for all candidates. The Punjab Police have claimed that they are taking steps to ensure the safety of the contestants, including those belonging to the BJP, but the latter is not convinced.

    Farmers from the state had launched the Dilli Chalo agitation earlier this year, seeking a legal guarantee for the minimum support price (MSP). However, they were prevented from reaching the Capital by the authorities in BJP-ruled Haryana, which resorted to a heavy-handed approach. The MSP issue has remained unresolved despite a series of talks between the Centre and some farm unions.

    The BJP has its task cut out in the state, where it is going solo after its efforts to mend fences with its old ally, the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), proved futile. The SAD had parted ways with the NDA in 2021 amid the farmers’ agitation over the contentious farm laws enacted by the Centre. Even the repeal of the laws did not help the BJP win over the state’s farming community, as seen in January 2022, when protesters forced PM Modi to go back without addressing a poll rally in Ferozepur. With its nominees also facing the heat in parts of rural Haryana, the saffron party can’t afford to ignore the anger and anguish of the region’s farmers. At the same time, the alleged infringement of the candidates’ right to campaign needs to be probed and accountability fixed for the lapses.

    (Tribune, India)

     

  • ED in the dock : Court curbs agency’s powers under PMLA

    The country is in the midst of the General Election, but it’s the ED (Enforcement Directorate) which is far more in the news than the EC (Election Commission). The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, May 16, that the ED could not arrest an accused under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) after a special court had taken cognizance of the complaint of money laundering. The Bench stated that when an accused appeared before a judge in pursuance of a summons, the agency would have to apply to the court concerned to obtain his or her custody. According to the court, such an accused is not required to apply for bail as he or she would not be treated as being in custody.

    The ruling is another setback to the ED, which has been under intense judicial scrutiny in recent months and repeatedly accused by Opposition parties of overreach. These parties, especially AAP, have claimed that their leaders are being targeted by Central probe agencies at the behest of the ruling party. The ED’s allegedly unbridled powers under the PMLA have been the subject of a heated debate since 2017, when a Division Bench struck down the Act’s Section 45(1), which imposed additional conditions for grant of bail to the accused. However, this decision had been overruled by a July 2022 judgment of another SC Bench.

    Meanwhile, the SC has asserted that no exception was made in granting interim bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in a money laundering case. ‘We said in our order what we felt was justified,’ the Bench said, adding that a critical analysis of the verdict was welcome. These observations have come two weeks after the court questioned the ED about the timing of Kejriwal’s arrest — in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections. Clearly, the ED has a lot of explaining to do in one case after another.
    (Tribune, India)

  • Malign motive: On the arrest and remand of NewsClick founder

    Supreme Court order quashing arrest lays bare police design to circumvent due process

    The Supreme Court of India’s order invalidating the arrest and remand of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha is much more than a technical outcome based on the failure of the Delhi police to furnish the grounds for his arrest in writing. It is also an indictment of the clandestine manner in which the police sought to obtain his custody. As if invoking the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against the web portal was not malign enough — the case seems fictional in its entirety, and establishes no overt act that can even be described as unlawful, much less a terrorist act — the police seemed to have resorted to what the Court called a “blatant attempt to circumvent the due process of law”. The Court did not go into the merits of the case at this stage, but said enough to warrant an adverse inference about the absence of bona fides. Mr. Purkayastha was produced before a remand judge before dawn and his police custody obtained at 6 a.m., even though the police had the entire day to comply with the statutory requirement of producing him before a court within 24 hours. The police kept his lawyer in the dark about the early morning proceedings, and instead had a ‘remand advocate’ readily present during the proceedings. The idea was “to confine the accused to police custody without informing him the grounds on which he has been arrested; deprive the accused of the opportunity to avail the services of the legal practitioner of his choice so as to oppose the prayer for police custody remand, seek bail and also to mislead the court”.

    The judgment is also notable for extending, to the UAPA, the principle laid down in Pankaj Bansal (2023) that those arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act should be given the grounds of their arrest in writing. In fact, interpreting the relevant constitutional provisions, the Court says this may be required as a matter of course and without any exception for the arrest of any person under the UAPA or any other offences. The police recently filed a charge sheet in this case, which makes the outlandish claim that Mr. Purkayastha was funded by the Chinese government and that he and American millionaire Neville Roy Singham were involved in an alleged conspiracy to replace Indian democracy with a party-state system as in China. It speaks of their support to fomenting riots and protests in India and even funding terrorists. Given the grave, even if far-fetched, nature of the allegations against him, regular bail would have been difficult to come by. Therefore, it is salutary that the Court has treated the level of adherence to procedure — the need to furnish the grounds of arrest in this case — as sacrosanct.
    (The Hindu)

  • Let Truth Prevail

    On Modi’s accusation of “Chori ka Maal” (black money) being provided by Ambani and Adani to the Congress Party

    In the midst of the ongoing political landscape in India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a significant accusation during an election rally in Telangana on May 8, alleging a possible nexus between the Congress party and major Indian businessmen Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani. Modi stated that the Congress party, which had been vocal in its criticism of the Modi government for allegedly benefitting Ambani and Adani, had gone silent on the issue. He implied that the silence was due to an understanding or deal between the Congress party and the two businessmen, hinting at possible truckloads of “dark money” being supplied by the businessmen to the Congress party.

    Such statements carry significant weight, as the Prime Minister is the head of the government and a key political figure in India. His allegations against the Congress party, Ambani, and Adani have sparked a debate on the accountability and evidence surrounding such claims.
    Prime Minister Modi’s remarks suggest that the Congress party’s sudden silence on the Ambani-Adani issue is due to an undisclosed agreement between them. His suggestion that the Congress party may be receiving “tempoloads” (truckloads) of money from the businessmen implies a major breach of ethical conduct and potential criminal activity, particularly when the general elections are underway. .

    If the Prime Minister possesses evidence supporting his allegations, he should present it to the relevant authorities and initiate a proper investigation. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) are responsible for handling cases involving corruption and money laundering, respectively. Modi’s public accusations also place an onus on him to follow through with his statements by providing any evidence he may have.

    If Modi’s allegations are indeed credible, it would be essential to investigate the claims for the sake of transparency and maintaining public trust in the country’s institutions. The nation deserves to know the truth behind such serious accusations.

    Should the Prime Minister fail to provide evidence to back up his claims, the situation could take a different turn. Accusations without evidence could be seen as an attempt to defame the Congress party, as well as Ambani and Adani, damaging their reputations and creating unnecessary political tension.

    On the other hand, if Modi does present substantial evidence and it leads to legal action against the Congress party, Ambani, and Adani, it would signify a major shift in the Indian political and economic landscape. Such a revelation would have profound implications for the relationships between the government, the opposition, and major corporate entities.

    The nation deserves clarity on these serious accusations, which have the potential to impact the political, economic, and ethical landscape of the country. The Prime Minister must present the evidence to the appropriate agencies or face the possibility of legal consequences for making unsubstantiated claims. As the political landscape evolves, the nation watches closely, eager to see how this situation unfolds.

  • Not by money alone, Mr. Trump

    Wake up, America-your future depends on it

    Donald Trump’s reported promise to the oil industry captains in exchange for a billion-dollar campaign fund in an attempt to return to the White House is deeply troubling. If true, it reflects a concerning disregard for the welfare of the nation and the American people in favor of personal ambition and financial gain. Such a deal prioritizes corporate interests over the broader public good and environmental sustainability, echoing the accusations against figures like Julius Caesar’s antagonist Cassius, who was accused of selling and manipulating positions for personal gain.

    The scenario you describe highlights a fundamental ethical issue: the potential sale of political influence in exchange for financial support. This kind of transaction not only undermines the democratic principles upon which the United States was founded, but it also jeopardizes the nation’s future by entrenching the interests of the fossil fuel industry at a time when the world is facing an urgent climate crisis. By making promises to protect the fossil fuel industry, Trump could be endorsing a path that exacerbates environmental degradation and hinders progress toward cleaner, sustainable energy sources.

    The comparison to Caesar’s accusation against Cassius is apt, suggesting a betrayal of the public trust for private gain. America’s political system is built on the idea of elected officials serving the interests of their constituents and upholding the country’s values and integrity. When politicians prioritize their own interests or the interests of specific industries over those of the public, they are eroding the foundation of democracy and contributing to the decay of the nation’s ethical standards.

    The personal history of Donald Trump—declaring bankruptcy multiple times, allegedly defrauding Americans by avoiding taxes, and living a life of luxury at the expense of others—paints a picture of a man with little regard for ethical conduct. This raises serious questions about his potential to lead the nation effectively and with integrity. If a leader cannot manage their own affairs responsibly, it is reasonable to doubt their ability to manage the complex challenges facing a nation.

    The metaphor of “vermin eating into the vitals of a tree” is a powerful image that conveys the potential long-term harm such a deal could cause to the country. If left unchecked, decisions driven by self-interest and financial gain can erode the core values and institutions that have historically made America strong. It is a call to action for Americans to be vigilant and demand accountability from their leaders.

    America deserves leaders who prioritize the well-being of the nation and its people, who strive to act in the best interests of all citizens, not just a select few. This requires rejecting any attempts to compromise political integrity for financial gain and holding politicians accountable for their actions.

    The scenario is a stark reminder of the importance of ethical leadership and the need for Americans to remain vigilant in their pursuit of a government that serves the public good. As the nation faces critical challenges, including the climate crisis and economic inequality, it is crucial to demand leaders who are committed to finding solutions that benefit all, rather than perpetuating a cycle of exploitation and self-interest. Wake up, America—your future depends on it.

  • Indian students in peril

    America must prioritize their safety

    The spike in the deaths of Indian or Indian-origin students in the US this year indicates that the Joe Biden administration is not doing enough to halt the alarming attacks. Earlier this week, Mohammed Abdul Arfath, a 25-year-old student from Hyderabad, was found dead in Cleveland; he had been missing since last month. His family had received a ransom call on March 17. It is unfortunate that the student could not be rescued, even though the Indian consulate had claimed that it was working with local law enforcement agencies to find him. The death of an Indian student, Uma Satya Sai Gadde, was reported in Ohio last week, while a trained classical dancer, Amarnath Ghosh, was shot dead in St Louis, Missouri, in March.

    A succession of unnatural deaths in January-February had prompted White House communications officer John Kirby to assert that there was no excuse for violence based on race, gender, religion or any other factor. In a bid to reassure the Indian diaspora, he had said that the Biden administration was working ‘very, very hard’ to try to thwart the attacks. US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti had said that his government was ‘very committed’ to making Indians realize that America was a safe and wonderful place to study. However, the situation on the ground seems to be worsening.

    The US-based Foundation for India and Indian Diaspora Studies has identified the main causes of these incidents, which include violent crimes, suspicious accidents and mental issues triggering suicide. It has urged the authorities to raise awareness about various risks and provide mental health support. There is speculation that negative propaganda against the community is fueling hate crime. With Indians accounting for about 25 per cent of the foreign students in the US, it is imperative for America to prioritize their safety and crack down on the hate-mongers. The prevailing laxity can damage America’s reputation as a popular destination for Indian students.
    (Tribune, India)