Tag: Jammu and Kashmir

  • 2025 in the Shadow of Fear: The Deadliest Terror Attacks That Shook India

    2025 in the Shadow of Fear: The Deadliest Terror Attacks That Shook India

    In 2025, India’s vibrant life was punctuated by moments of tragedy that reminded the nation of the persistent threat of terrorism. The year saw attacks that claimed lives, challenged security agencies, and left a deep emotional scar on the country. From scenic tourist valleys to the heart of the national capital, terror struck indiscriminately, leaving families, communities, and the nation to grapple with loss, grief, and the urgent need for heightened vigilance.
    This feature revisits the deadliest terror incidents of 2025, exploring the events, the human stories behind them, and their long-lasting implications.
    Pahalgam Massacre: Innocence Shattered in the Valley
    On a bright spring afternoon of 22 April 2025, the picturesque Baisaran Valley in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, became the site of unimaginable horror. The valley, known for its rolling meadows, pony rides, and tourist gatherings, was suddenly invaded by armed militants. Witnesses later described the terrifying moments when automatic gunfire ripped through the tranquil air, turning laughter and leisure into panic and chaos.
    By the end of the assault, 26 civilians had been killed and over 20 injured. Most victims were tourists – newlyweds, families, and foreign visitors. A local pony operator, who reportedly tried to protect visitors, also lost his life. Survivors recounted the attackers asking victims about their religion before shooting, adding a chilling psychological layer to the brutality.
    The militant group The Resistance Front (TRF), allegedly linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba, initially claimed responsibility but later denied involvement. The attack sparked nationwide outrage, highlighting gaps in tourist security in conflict-prone regions and prompting questions about intelligence lapses.
    Aftermath and Response
    The federal government acted swiftly. Security forces launched extensive counter-terror operations, conducting raids and detaining over 175 suspects. Homes of suspected militants were demolished, while border and internal security were tightened to prevent further attacks. In a diplomatic move, the government temporarily suspended visas for Pakistani nationals, signaling serious concern over cross-border militant involvement.
    The tragedy also resonated internationally. Multilateral forums, including the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, condemned the attack and called for collective action against terrorism, reflecting the global implications of local violence.
    Red Fort Car Bombing: Terror Strikes the Capital
    Less than seven months later, India witnessed another shocking attack – this time in its capital, New Delhi. On 10 November 2025, a car laden with explosives detonated near the Red Fort Metro Station, one of the city’s most iconic landmarks. The blast killed 15 people and injured more than 20, leaving debris scattered across streets and damaging nearby buildings.
    Investigators revealed that the attack was carefully planned to strike during peak hours, ensuring maximum casualties. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) swiftly took charge, arresting several suspects linked to the plot. Among them was Yasir Ahmad Dar, alleged to have pledged himself to a suicide mission, along with others reportedly affiliated with extremist networks across northern India.
    The Red Fort bombing prompted urgent debates on urban security preparedness. Lawmakers, security analysts, and civil society highlighted the need for enhanced surveillance, rapid emergency response, and intelligence integration to prevent attacks in densely populated areas. Internationally, the blast drew condemnation from world leaders, including the United States, which praised India’s methodical investigation and response.
    Other Violent Incidents: Insurgency and Extremism
    While Pahalgam and Red Fort were the deadliest attacks, other incidents underscored the multiplicity of security challenges in India. In Bijapur district, Chhattisgarh, Maoist insurgents detonated an improvised explosive device targeting a security convoy, killing eight personnel and a civilian driver in January 2025. This internal insurgency highlighted that terrorism in India is not only transnational but also deeply domestic, rooted in longstanding socio-political grievances.
    Collectively, these incidents exposed vulnerabilities across urban and rural India, prompting the government to reassess counter-terror strategies, resource allocation, and rapid response mechanisms.
    The Human Toll: Grief and Resilience
    The deadliest attacks of 2025 were not just statistics; they represented human lives, families, and dreams abruptly ended. In Pahalgam, parents mourned children, spouses lost partners on their honeymoon, and communities grappled with trauma. In Delhi, ordinary commuters, workers, and passersby became victims in an attack that shattered the sense of safety in the capital.
    Yet, amid the grief, stories of courage and resilience emerged. Locals who assisted the injured, citizens who volunteered for relief, and communities that organized vigils and memorials displayed the nation’s ability to unite in the face of terror.
    National Reflection and Security Lessons
    The attacks of 2025 prompted a national introspection on security and preparedness. Authorities enhanced urban surveillance, intelligence sharing, and coordination between central and state agencies. Public awareness campaigns encouraged citizens to remain vigilant and report suspicious activities.
    Furthermore, the incidents influenced diplomatic engagement, with India emphasizing the need to combat cross-border terrorism through international cooperation while balancing domestic policy and civil liberties.
    Looking Forward
    While 2025 will be remembered for these tragic attacks, it is also a testament to India’s resilience and resolve. The year underscored that terrorism, in its many forms, remains a potent threat, but collective vigilance, intelligence, and community solidarity can mitigate its impact.
    As India moves forward, the lessons of Pahalgam, Red Fort, and other attacks will continue to shape national security policy, urban preparedness, and public consciousness, ensuring that while terror may strike, the spirit of the nation endures unbroken.

  • No change in policy on Jammu and Kashmir, says U.S.

    No change in policy on Jammu and Kashmir, says U.S.

    WASHINGTON (TIP): The United States on Wednesday, Feb 10, said that there is no change in its policy on Jammu and Kashmir. “I want to be very clear there has been no change in U.S. policy in the region,” State Department Spokesperson Ned Price told reporters in view of a tweet from the South and Central Asia Bureau of the State Department which welcomed the resumption of 4G mobile internet in Jammu and Kashmir.

    “We welcome the resumption of 4G mobile internet in India’s Jammu & Kashmir. This marks an important step for local residents, and we look forward to continued political & economic progress to restore normalcy in J&K,” tweeted the South and Central Asia Bureau of the State Department. High-speed mobile internet was restored on February 5 in the entire union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, exactly one and a half years after it was snapped in August 2019 when the Centre had abrogated the special status of the erstwhile State. According to a 2019 Congressional Research Service report of August 2019, a longstanding goal of U.S. policy in South Asia has been to prevent India-Pakistan conflict from escalating to inter-state war. This meant the United States has sought to avoid actions that overtly favored either party. Over the past decade, however, Washington has grown closer to India while relations with Pakistan continue to be viewed as clouded by mistrust, CRS report said.

    On a question related to Twitter shutting down some accounts in India, Mr. Price said, “Well, I think what I would say generally is that around the world — and this goes back to what I was saying before — we are committed to supporting democratic values, including freedom of expression. I think when it comes to Twitter’s policies, we’d have to refer you to Twitter itself.”

    Responding to a similar question, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at her daily news conference: “of course, we always have concerns about crackdowns on freedom of speech, freedom of expression happening around the world and when it doesn’t allow people to communicate and peacefully protest.”

    (Source: PTI)