Tag: Jr.

  • Martin Luther King Jr.: When History Became a Life, and a Life Became History

    Martin Luther King Jr.: When History Became a Life, and a Life Became History

    By Prof. Indrajit S Saluja
    By Prof. Indrajit S Saluja

    In three days, America will once again commemorate Martin Luther King Jr.,a man whose life became inseparable from the moral history of the United States. King is remembered not merely as a charismatic speaker or a skillful organizer, but as one of the true leaders of the masses who emerged from among ordinary people and led them with extraordinary moral courage.His greatness lay not in the power he wielded, but in the conscience he awakened;not in authority imposed,but in dignity restored.In his case,history did not merely record a life-it flowed through it. King stepped onto the national stage at a moment when America was struggling to reconcile its founding ideals with its lived realities. The Constitution proclaimed equality, liberty, and justice, yet millions of citizens-particularly African Americans-were systematically denied these promises. Segregation was law in many states; discrimination was normalized; exploitation was an everyday condition. For Black Americans,the legacy of slavery had not ended with emancipation; it had taken new and insidious forms through Jim Crow laws, voter suppression, economic deprivation,and social exclusion. This was the America King confronted-not with bitterness or vengeance, but with moral clarity and disciplined hope. What distinguishes King from many other leaders is the path he consciously chose. Deeply influenced by Christian ethics and inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence, King believed that injustice could not be defeated by hatred and that violence could never cleanse a society of oppression. His movement was a Gandhian experiment on American soil-one that sought to rid the nation of inequality through moral force rather than brute strength. King understood that violence might secure temporary concessions, but only nonviolence could achieve lasting transformation by changing hearts as well as laws. King did not invent the civil rights movement, but he gave it focus, coherence, and a unifying moral language. Through the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Birmingham Campaign, the Selma marches, and the historic March on Washington, he helped turn localized protests into a national moral awakening. He compelled America to look unflinchingly into the mirror-and to confront the gulf between its professed ideals and its daily practices. He made the suffering of the marginalized visible, and he did so in a way that appealed to the nation’s highest values rather than its lowest instincts.
    Perhaps King’s most enduring contribution was his insistence on the universality of justice.Though he emerged as a leader of the Black community, he never confined his message to one race or one grievance. His dream was not of one group’s ascendancy over another, but of a shared humanity bound by equal dignity. When he spoke of a nation where people would be judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, he articulated a moral ideal that transcended race while directly confronting racial injustice.In doing so,he transformed the civil rights struggle from a sectional demand into a national moral imperative.
    It must be acknowledged-honestly and without evasion-that America still suffers from many of the ailments King sought to remove.Inequality persists;discrimination has not vanished but often changed form; economic disparities remain stark;and the wounds of racial injustice continue to reopen with troubling regularity. The realities of unequal policing, voter disenfranchisement, unequal educational opportunities, and disproportionate incarceration serve as reminders that the journey King began remains unfinished.
    Yet these truths do not diminish King’s achievement;they magnify it.Before King, segregation was defended openly as tradition and law. After King, discrimination became morally indefensible-even when it persisted in practice. Before King, vast sections of America accepted inequality as inevitable. After King, equality became a shared national aspiration, however imperfectly realized. He shifted the moral center of gravity of the nation.
    King’s leadership lifted a large section of the American population-particularly the Black community-from the quagmire of invisibility and institutionalized exploitation. His efforts helped secure landmark legislative victories such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, reshaping the legal architecture of American democracy. These were not mere statutes; they were declarations that the nation would no longer legitimize exclusion as policy.
    Crucially, King’s moral vision widened toward the end of his life.He spoke not only against racial injustice, but also against economic exploitation and militarism. He recognized that poverty was a form of violence and that endless war abroad eroded justice at home. His opposition to the Vietnam War-controversial and costly to his popularity-flowed from a consistent belief that a society cannot value human life selectively. Justice, for King, was indivisible.
    King paid dearly for his convictions. He was surveilled, harassed, and maligned. Ultimately,he was assassinated.Yet even in death, his voice did not fade. It gained permanence. His legacy took root not only in laws and institutions, but in the American conscience itself-where it continues to question, challenge, and inspire. As America prepares to honor Martin Luther King Jr., it must resist the temptation to reduce him to a ceremonial figure adorned with safe quotations. To honor King authentically is to engage his life as a challenge, not a comfort. It is to reckon honestly with progress achieved and failures endured, and to accept responsibility for the work that remains. The Unfinished Trust: A Charge to Today’s Leaders This is where the present generation of leaders must be addressed-plainly and directly. The responsibility of carrying King’s mission forward now rests squarely on their shoulders. King did his part. He showed the path,bore the burden,and paid the price. What remains unfinished is not due to a lack of vision,but to an erosion of moral courage among those entrusted with power. King’s dream was never meant to be preserved as an artifact of history. It was meant to be practiced and advanced. Today’s leaders-elected officials, policymakers, judges, educators, and civic voices-must rise above partisan advantage and ideological trench warfare.Leadership worthy of the name unites people; it does not profit from their division. America today stands dangerously polarized along racial, economic, ideological,and cultural lines.Much of this division is cultivated, amplified, and weaponized. King warned against such temptations. He believed power was legitimate only when it served justice; authority authentic only when it uplifted the vulnerable;governance honorable only when it respected human dignity. The question for leaders today is stark: are they builders of bridges or architects of walls? Are they healers or amplifiers of grievance? King understood that America’s diversity was not a liability to be managed but a strength to be honored. Unity, as he envisioned it, did not require uniformity, fairness, empathy, and a shared commitment to justice. To carry forward King’s mission is not to recite his words but to embody his values.It is to reject politics of fear and embrace politics of hope; to ensure that the law protects the powerless as faithfully as it serves the powerful; and to guarantee that no American feels excluded from the nation’s promise because of race, faith, or economic circumstance. Above all, it is to practice leadership that elevates the moral tone of public life. King believed that the arc of the moral universe bends toward justice-but only if people are willing to bend it.His life proves that progress is neither automatic nor inevitable; it is earned through sacrifice, restraint, and moral resolve. If today’s leaders can summon that spirit-if they can rise to King’s standard rather than merely praise it-then his dream can live on not as memory,but as reality. A nation united by justice is a nation nothing can divide. That was Martin Luther King Jr.’s faith.It must now become America’s resolve.

  • USA is a Nation of Laws: Trump Indicted

    USA is a Nation of Laws: Trump Indicted

    D.A. Alvin Bragg Unseals 34 Felony Counts

    “The task for politicians is to give politics a rest, as our nation is undergoing a stress-test the likes of which even Richard Nixon was exempted from. Our Republic need not have gotten to this day, as we ought not have had January 6th. It is time to be American first, and party-politician second. America is made up of all Americans, and we need political E Pluribus Unum more than ever to remain the United States of America, and not become, as Senator Joe Manchin recently said: divided States of America.”

    By Ravi Batra

    In our nearly 250 year history, since our exceptional birth and Constitution, we have proudly said: we are a nation of laws, not men. Today, on that secular alter of justice, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg held up former President Donald John Trump, duly indicted with 34 felony counts, as “Exhibit A” proving that truly “no one is above the law.” The Manhattan DA’s office has been occupied by Giants, each of whom made history: Tom Dewey, Frank Hogan, Robert M. Morgenthau (my dear friend and mentor), Cyrus Roberts Vance, Jr., and now Alvin Leonard Bragg, Jr.

    Leaving politics aside, there ought be no joy in the heart of any American that a former American President stands criminally charged – no matter whether you love Trump or hate him. Indeed, it’s painful, perhaps, even more than January 6th, that a former President violated his personal oath to honor the rule of law. That Justice will prevail, and Mr. Trump will be afforded every Constitutional right that every American gets, including, presumptive-innocence and the all-powerful right to confront the witnesses against him is something we, as Americans, are uniquely proud of. After all, these legal and constitutional rights protect citizens from preventing anyone in Government – who may seek to violate Lincoln’s promise that our government is “of, by and for” the people – run roughshod over any one of us.

    These 34 Felony Counts Are All about “Mens Rea” and the “Upgrade”

    The 34 counts are business record-based, which is to say that the “bad act” part of each crime is nearly incontrovertible, leaving open for advocacy only the “bad mind,” or “mens rea,” to prove the crime was committed beyond a reasonable doubt. Normally, the Prosecutor has to prove both the “bad act” and the “bad mind” beyond a reasonable doubt to a fair and impartial jury of twelve.

    The additional legal challenge for DA Bragg here is to prove the “upgrading” of normal misdemeanor business record-charges into felony charges due to: “with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof.” And, for that, DA Bragg, in his press conference post-plea, said the “other crime” was New York State election law violation as well as a violation of federal campaign contribution limits. He need not prove both; just proving one of the two will be enough to “upgrade” the misdemeanor into a “felony,” and unlike flying on a plane when the upgrade gets you more seat and leg-room for greater comfort, here, the upgrade provides the Sentencing Judge with the authority to order the then-convicted-defendant more pain and a longer sentence commensurate with the crimes convicted, while considering all mitigating factors, including, age and health, for a lesser sentence, including, no jail time. The political irony here is that New York State has been blasted by Republicans on being “soft” on defendants charged with crimes. Well, now, that very objected-to New York “softness” helps former President Trump, including, our state laws that insist upon expansive discovery production by prosecutors to help all defendants better prepare for trial.

    The legal battle, then, when it truly gets past the initial flurry of activity, will be hand-to-hand combat with the defense trying to raise doubt about Mr. Trump’s “intent” for each Count and the “upgrade” state or federal predicate.

    Justice Merchan Takes Charge

    Today, President Trump pled “Not Guilty,” and was warned by Justice Juan Merchan to “refrain” from social media posts with the potential to incite violence. This warning was not idle, and presents additional legal jeopardy for Mr. Trump – just like Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. did by holding: you cannot yell “fire’ in a crowded theater, without being held liable for those who get trampled in the ensuing melee.

    While President Trump has enjoyed being a political or economic pugilist to-date, suddenly, there are legal risks now imposed by Justice Merchan, as the law is not a trifle, and the integrity of the profession must be maintained. As America’s greatest mayor Rudy Giuliani has learned, a title he earned by keeping all New Yorkers together after 9/11, when his law license was suspended by the NYS Supreme Court’s Appellate Division First Department for his over-zealous advocacy, which the Court held violated the core obligation imposed-by-law on every lawyer by the Rules of Professional Conduct: to maintain the integrity of the profession, and safeguard Judicial Independence. Lying by a lawyer is not allowed, and is surely not risk-free.

    Procedures and Timelines

    New York allows interlocutory appeals of Orders the aggrieved party wishes to appeal, and by doing so, there is delay of the trial. Federal cases, generally, do not have as-of-right appeal of every Order issued, and hence are quicker to try the case. Here, President Trump has more legal jeopardy as there is US DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith (Confidential Documents etc.) and Georgia state DA looking into the “11,780 votes” Mr. Trump was desperately looking to find. And then, there are civil cases. Mr. Trump is going to be quite busy consulting with his lawyers or being in Court. The national convention will occur next summer, with a presidential election in November 2024. It’s quite likely that one or more trials may not have occurred before November 2024. Mr. Trump may well find that he needs to pay real close attention to exercising all of his legal rights, if he is to avoid, or at least, minimize, legal liability.

    E Pluribus Unum, Not Republicans or Democrats

    The task for politicians is to give politics a rest, as our nation is undergoing a stress-test the likes of which even Richard Nixon was exempted from. Our Republic need not have gotten to this day, as we ought not have had January 6th. It is time to be American first, and party-politician second. America is made up of all Americans, and we need political E Pluribus Unum more than ever to remain the United States of America, and not become, as Senator Joe Manchin recently said: divided States of America.

    America: Reveille!

    To close, I urge all Americans to recall the special wish of the Lion of the Senate, Pat Leahy: let America always have “Reveille”!

    (The author is the publisher of The America Times Company Ltd., and since January 2022, is the Editor-in-Chief. He is a member of the National Press Club, in Washington D.C., and a member of its “Freedom of the Press” and “International Correspondents” Teams/Committees. An eminent, he is a member of the bar since 1981. )

    (Originally published in America Times. Republished with abridgements, with publisher’s permission)

  • “Political will, professional will, and peoples’ will together can do anything”

    Dr. V.K.Raju, Founder-President of the Eye Foundation of America.

    Dr. V.K. Raju is the Founder and president of the Eye Foundation of America and a clinical professor of ophthalmology at West Virginia University in Morgantown. He received his medical degree from Andhra University in Visakhapatnam, India. He completed both his ophthalmology residency and fellowship at the University of London. Dr. Raju is a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons and the American College of Surgeons.

    The Eye Foundation of America he founded has been rendering services since 1977 in India and 21 other developing countries. The mammoth work the EFA team has done could be the envy of any humanitarian organization. Close to 400,000   eye surgeries, 2.5 million + outpatients- it is a colossal work. It helped found 2 Eye Institutes – Goutami and Srikiran in AP, India in 2005.  These institutes have committed to provide innovative and compassionate care to the patients, by incorporating new technology and through patient education. His mission was to protect, preserve and restore the treasured gift of sight for improving quality of life by providing caring service, irrespective of the socio-economic status, with due emphasis on education and research.

    Dr Raju has received numerous awards, including the Academy’s Outstanding Humanitarian Award, the Melvin Jones Fellowship from the International Lions Foundation, the Paul Harris Fellow Award from Rotary International, the Distinguished Community Service Award from the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin and the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Achievement Award from West Virginia University. Dr. Raju has published over 300 presentations, articles and chapters. He has authored 2 books , and more are in the pipeline. Along with his clinical work, his interests include medical history, establishing lectureships to enhance teaching and the prevention of blindness in children through teaching, service and research.

    The Indian Panorama editor Prof. Indrajit S Saluja caught up with Dr. Raju who was in New York as a guest at the Diwali at Times Square, and had a conversation with him on his favorite subject of prevention of blindness among children. 

    TIP: What is your message to readers of The Indian Panorama? 

    I was born in India but lived in West Virginia most of my life. People often say that I am working so hard for a long time. Actually 45 years now since this work began. When you like and do the work, it’s not work anymore. I do believe in that. Today we are living in an incredible age with the advancement of medicine. But for children, I think it’s not fair. I have worked in 30 countries but our main nucleus is India. As my mentor used to say in London ‘there are three solutions for every problem involved – first is education, second is education, and third is education.’  So, if you educate people, problems will be minimum. If we can give education and health to  children, they will build the nation. I feel there is need for charities for them.

    Dr. V.K. Raju examines children at Goutami Hospital in Rajahmundry in Andhra Pradesh. 

    TIP: What is your vision and mission about Goutami?

    Our work starts with ‘eye camp’ which is a wonderful concept. The concept is:  screening, seeing the patients outside the hospital. In rural areas people don’t want to come to the hospitals because it’s threatening. Even today, even in the United States, people are somehow concerned about coming to the hospitals. We treat people outside the hospital. Screen them, advise them and some of the treatments we give outside the hospital. In 1979 we started a temporary facility outside the hospital with screening, advising the patients and giving minor treatments which are quite safe outside the hospital. You have heard about health fairs where we set up all facilities by screening people and if needed ultimately sending them to the hospitals to complete the procedure. But 30-40 years back there was a problem. After you finish the camp where will patients go for follow up?  So, we started two institutions – and the latest one is Goutami. Giving continuous care is the main thing. Our priority is children, children, and children. We talk about education and 80% of our education is through vision and if the children miss that chance, it’s not only problem to the child, it’sa problem to the community, society, and to the country. In eyecare, if you catch them early, treat them early, problems can be resolved. Goutami has excellent telemedicine facility – biggest program in Andhra Pradesh. We screen every baby who is prematurely born – 8% to 10% of them need special attention. Fifteen to thirty minutes treatment can save them from blindness.

    The Rotary Clubs helped us a lot in organizing the eye camps. Goutami does a camp a day. Anything can be done today but we have to do it together. If the will is there it can be done. Political will, professional will, and peoples’ will togethercando anything.

    TIP: Have you launched a project on eyecare in Rotary Club in Morgantown?

    Yes we did. In United States there is a problem with nutrition. What people eat in West Virginia is not good for health, and obesity is the major issue. We really try to educate  parents and their children in the farmers market  about what to eat properly. In ancient Ayurvedic system of India, it is not the medications. The principles of Ayurveda are – eat right, exercise right, fix your lifestyle  and then if it’s not enough then take medication. We are trying to make people conscious about that. Mindset is important. Forget what you have done. Think about what you have to do.

     TIP: The lifestyle in America, does it cause any eye ailment?

    Yes. Children spending too much time with cellphone or video game can suffer from Myopia. But we can check that. They should take a break from screens every 30 or 45 minutes. It’s up to the parents because children learn what they live.

    TIP: Do you have any plans to extend the work of Eye Foundation of America  in Central American countries?

    I am so glad you have asked this question. The Eye Foundation of America will go where the need is the highest. We’re planning to go to Guatemala  end of this year or early next year. The Green Goutami project is coming up. Once the new building starts we will extend our reach in Guatemala.

    Children receive expert care at Goutami Hospital.

    TIP: Tell us about the new Goutami Building

    We have all facilities with the latest and greatest equipment. There will be treatment for a rare cancer of the eye  called ‘Retinoblastoma.’ Cancer in the eye is very rare but important aspect of eye cancer is tumor in the eye in the back of retina. We want to make people aware of this. We are planning to do some projects with Nargis DuttMemorial Cancer Foundation. 

    TIP: What’s your call on Govt of India’s child welfare programs?

    Indian government has done incredible job in this regard but after getting about 80% success there is relaxation. They have achieved whatever, but there are problems in implementation. In villages and rural areas there is still vitamin deficiency and vitamin A deficiency is not only bad but it can make you blind. There is a problem of immunity. If a vitamin A deficient child gets measles, it can cause death.  Not a single child be left behind.That should be the attitude. We should not stop until we reach the last post.

  • MAYOR ADAMS ANNOUNCES COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND WORKER PROTECTION

    MAYOR ADAMS ANNOUNCES COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND WORKER PROTECTION

    Vilda Vera Mayuga has been appointed Commissioner of Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
    José Ortiz, Jr. has been appointed Senior Advisor for Workforce Development.

    NEW YORK (TIP): New York City Mayor Eric Adams, on February 8 announced two new appointments to fill out his economic development team and deliver on his vision for uplifting and protecting working New Yorkers. Vilda Vera Mayuga will serve as commissioner of the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP). As commissioner, Mayuga will deepen the agency’s mission of ensuring there are robust protections in place for city workers and consumers, and that such protections are fairly and equitably applied. Jose Ortiz, Jr. will serve as senior advisor for workforce development. In that role, he will advise Deputy Mayor for Economic and Workforce Development Maria Torres-Springer on strategies for better coordinating the city’s workforce development programs to aid the city’s recovery from COVID-19 and ensure people from underserved communities have access to good-paying jobs. “As a blue-collar mayor, I am focused on building a team that serves the needs of working New Yorkers throughout the five boroughs,” said Mayor Adams. “From preparing workers for jobs in emerging industries to ensuring dignity and economic justice in the workplace, my administration has an ambitious agenda to ‘Get Stuff Done’ for the hard-working people of this city. Vilda and Jose have been doing this work for a long time, and I am thrilled to have them join our economic development team as we work to build an equitable recovery.”

    “The city’s economic recovery depends on our ability to propel multiple sectors of our economy, protect workers and consumers, and connect New Yorkers to family-sustaining jobs,” said Deputy Mayor for Economic and Workforce Development Maria Torres-Springer. “I am therefore thrilled we have incredibly talented and devoted leaders like Vilda Vera Mayuga and Jose Ortiz Jr., who will work every day to ensure our economic and workforce development policies lift up families across the five boroughs and power an inclusive recovery for our city.” “I am thrilled to join the outstanding team at the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection,” said incoming DCWP Commissioner Vilda Vera Mayuga. “Thank you to Mayor Eric Adams for entrusting me with such an important agency. In New York City, everyone is a consumer, and I am committed to ensuring all have the necessary tools to avoid falling prey to fraud and deceit. Similarly, our workers need our systems to work for their betterment, and we will do that in conjunction with our businesses so we can all be winners in this great city.”

    “It has been my honor to serve as an advocate for developing talent in every corner of this great city,” said incoming Senior Advisor for Workforce Development Jose Ortiz, Jr. “I’m thrilled to begin this next chapter as senior advisor for Workforce Development, and thank Mayor Eric Adams and Deputy Mayor Maria Torres-Springer for the opportunity to continue this important work in service to the city.”

    “It has been a tremendous privilege to serve my fellow New Yorkers as commissioner of DCWP and inspiring to work alongside the committed team at this agency,” said DCWP Commissioner Peter A. Hatch. “Together we settled the city’s largest paid safe and sick leave law investigation, returning millions in restitution to more than 11,000 home health aides, reached more than one million families with assistance in claiming the Child Tax Credit; added paid leave specifically for caregivers to get their children vaccinated; and provided new protections for more than 65,000 delivery workers, and relief for more than 20,000 hard-hit restaurants and millions of consumers as the first agency in the nation to license and regulate the growing number of third-party food delivery apps. I congratulate incoming Commissioner Mayuga and offer all my support. Under Mayor Adams and Commissioner Mayuga, DCWP will thrive —making New York City more business, consumer, and worker friendly.”

    “The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection is a crucial partner in protecting the workers and consumers of our city,” said Theo Oshiro, co-executive director, Make the Road New York. “Our community members depend on DCWP to enforce their workplace rights and to access key resources, like financial literacy counseling and know-your-rights information. As commissioner of DCWP, Vilda Mayuga will be a steadfast partner in protecting the rights of New York City’s workers and consumers; she has the experience, vision, and true connection to the community that is needed for this vital post. We look forward to working with Vilda Mayuga to strive for a city where every New Yorker can thrive.”

    We are thrilled that the mayor is bringing in a tireless advocate and leader with such a strong record on economic justice” said Debra-Ellen Glickstein, executive director, NYC Kids RISE, and former executive director, DCWP’s Office of Financial Empowerment. “We look forward to collaborating to support community wealth building throughout New York City neighborhoods and building on the successful work of the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection.”

    “Hispanic Federation congratulates Vilda Vera Mayuga on her appointment as commissioner of the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. As a Latina who has vast experience across all levels of government, we are proud of this achievement. She has set incredible precedents throughout her career, and we look forward to working with her in her new role,” said Frankie Miranda, president and CEO, Hispanic Federation.

    “Understanding the importance of investing in the people who make up the workforce of our great city has always been paramount to Jose Ortiz Jr.,” said Kathleen Culhane, president, Nontraditional Employment for Women, and board chair, New York City Employment & Training Coalition. “We commend the Adams administration for embracing Jose’s expertise and dedication to connecting New Yorkers to the career skills, education, and relationships that can result in thriving communities and a more robust economy. Jose’s four years of leadership and advocacy at the New York City Employment & Training Coalition have resulted in a stronger, more extensive association of professionals united in a shared purpose that elevates working New Yorkers, while tackling persistent challenges through inclusion and innovation. We look forward to continuing to work with Jose and Mayor Adams in pursuit of this critical mission to support our workforce.” “Jose has deep knowledge of workforce programs, service providers, and needs. He is a perfect choice for this critically important position,” said Kathryn Wylde, president and CEO, Partnership for New York City.

    “New York City faces one of the gravest unemployment crises in recent memory,” said Jason Cone, public policy officer, Robin Hood. “It is a crisis that has created tremendous pain for low-income communities throughout the city and it cannot be confronted by government or business alone. Jose Ortiz has been at the forefront of fostering partnerships between government, business, civil society, and philanthropy for his entire career to extend opportunity to New Yorkers and empower them to transform their lives through workforce training and development. Robin Hood was proud to recognize Jose’s vital work as part of its first group of Power Fund leaders, driving change for communities of color. We look forward to continuing to partner with him as he supports and advises Deputy Mayor Torres-Springer in the months and years to come to help get tens of thousands of New Yorkers back to work and on the path to economic opportunity.”

    “I’m excited to hear that Joey Ortiz has been named New York City’s senior advisor for Workforce Development,” Steve Choi, executive director, One for Democracy. “Joey brings smarts, innovation, a wealth of private and public-sector relationships and, above all, a passion for lifting up New York City’s workers and businesses to bring greater prosperity for all. Kudos to Mayor Adams for this pick.”

    About Vilda Vera Mayuga

    Vilda Vera Mayuga is a seasoned public servant across all levels of government. Since July 2018, she has served as deputy secretary for Economic Opportunity at the New York State Department of State. In that capacity, she oversees the Office for New Americans, the Division of Consumer Protection, the Division of Community Services, and the Address Confidentiality Program. Mayuga is also the secretary of State’s designee to the Committee on Open Government.From 2014 until June 2018, she served as chair of the New York State Industrial Board of Appeals. She was the first Latina to hold the position.

    Previously, Mayuga was deputy commissioner for Worker Protection at the New York State Department of Labor, overseeing the divisions of Labor Standards, Safety and Health, and Immigrant Policies and Affairs. She started at the Department of Labor in February 2011 as executive director of the Division of Immigrant Policies and Affairs, where she implemented the agency’s first U-visa certification protocol and expanded the agency’s role and presence in the fight against human trafficking. Under her direction, the Agriculture Labor Program was started to provide services to both agricultural employers and workers. Mayuga also played a critical role in ensuring the agency’s compliance with language access requirements and worked heavily on the drafting of the statewide policy resulting in Executive Order 26.Mayuga also served as an assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Bureau of the Office of the New York Attorney General. There, she managed a diverse caseload of civil rights cases and handled every stage of litigation. Mayuga tried and settled numerous immigration services fraud cases that resulted in multimillion-dollar judgments. As a result, she received the 2009 Special Award for achievement in the Immigration Fraud Initiative.

    Before that, Mayuga served as an agency attorney and investigated Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaints within the Fire Department of New York (FDNY). She also conducted on-site inspections of FDNY premises, such as firehouses and EMS stations, to ensure compliance with the FDNY EEO policy. Mayuga also worked in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, where she analyzed, processed, and monitored requests for evidence from foreign countries. Mayuga graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor in Arts in International Relations from Boston University in Boston, Massachusetts. She received her law degree from the University of Puerto Rico School of Law in Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico. Mayuga is a member of the New York Bar.

    Mayuga will report to Deputy Mayor for Economic and Workforce Development Maria Torres-Springer.

    About Jose Ortiz, Jr.

    Jose Ortiz, Jr. was appointed chief executive officer of the New York City Employment and Training Coalition (NYCETC), the nation’s largest city-based membership association for the workforce development industry, in February 2018. Immediately prior to joining NYCETC, Ortiz served as the managing director of External Affairs, Partnerships, and Business Development at Pursuit, a Queens-based workforce nonprofit that prepares underserved and underprivileged individuals without college degrees for software development jobs at some of the world’s most innovative companies. Ortiz spent more than a decade at 92Y, a world-class cultural and community center, where he led youth and family programs, leadership initiatives, and conferences, and was a founding member of the Belfer Center for Innovation and Social Impact, which created Giving Tuesday.

    Ortiz has served on the board of directors of The Regional Plan Association, SkillUp, and the Human Services Council of New York, in addition to serving on a number of advisory boards. Ortiz has been invited to testify before the United States Congress’ Joint Economic Committee on the subject of “Connecting More People to Work” and has been covered by numerous media outlets, including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and NY1. Ortiz attended Baruch College and Milton Academy.

    Ortiz will report to Deputy Mayor for Economic and Workforce Development Maria Torres-Springer.

  • Martin Luther King Jr: American civil rights activist

    Martin Luther King Jr: American civil rights activist

    The national holiday, which takes place on the third Monday of January each year, serves as a day of remembrance for Martin Luther King, who was killed in Memphis in 1968. This year, it will be celebrated on Monday, January 17

    Martin Luther King, Jr., original name Michael King, Jr., (born January 15, 1929, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.—died April 4, 1968, Memphis, Tennessee), Baptist minister and social activist who led the civil rights movement in the United States from the mid-1950s until his death by assassination in 1968. His leadership was fundamental to that movement’s success in ending the legal segregation of African Americans in the South and other parts of the United States. King rose to national prominence as head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which promoted nonviolent tactics, such as the massive March on Washington (1963), to achieve civil rights. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964.

    Early years

    King came from a comfortable middle-class family steeped in the tradition of the Southern Black ministry: both his father and maternal grandfather were Baptist preachers. His parents were college-educated, and King’s father had succeeded his father-in-law as pastor of the prestigious Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta. The family lived on Auburn Avenue, otherwise known as “Sweet Auburn,” the bustling “Black Wall Street,” home to some of the country’s largest and most prosperous Black businesses and Black churches in the years before the civil rights movement. Young Martin received a solid education and grew up in a loving extended family.

    This secure upbringing, however, did not prevent King from experiencing the prejudices then common in the South. He never forgot the time when, at about age six, one of his white playmates announced that his parents would no longer allow him to play with King, because the children were now attending segregated schools. Dearest to King in these early years was his maternal grandmother, whose death in 1941 left him shaken and unstable. Upset because he had learned of her fatal heart attack while attending a parade without his parents’ permission, the 12-year-old King attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window.

    In 1944, at age 15, King entered Morehouse College in Atlanta under a special wartime program intended to boost enrollment by admitting promising high-school students like King. Before beginning college, however, King spent the summer on a tobacco farm in Connecticut; it was his first extended stay away from home and his first substantial experience of race relations outside the segregated South. He was shocked by how peacefully the races mixed in the North. “Negroes and whites go [to] the same church,” he noted in a letter to his parents. “I never [thought] that a person of my race could eat anywhere.” This summer experience in the North only deepened King’s growing hatred of racial segregation. At Morehouse, King favoured studies in medicine and law, but these were eclipsed in his senior year by a decision to enter the ministry, as his father had urged. King’s mentor at Morehouse was the college president, Benjamin Mays, a social gospel activist whose rich oratory and progressive ideas had left an indelible imprint on King’s father. Committed to fighting racial inequality, Mays accused the African American community of complacency in the face of oppression, and he prodded the Black church into social action by criticizing its emphasis on the hereafter instead of the here and now; it was a call to service that was not lost on the teenage King. He graduated from Morehouse in 1948.

    King spent the next three years at Crozer Theological Seminary in Chester, Pennsylvania, where he became acquainted with Mohandas Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence as well as with the thought of contemporary Protestant theologians. He earned a bachelor of divinity degree in 1951. Renowned for his oratorical skills, King was elected president of Crozer’s student body, which was composed almost exclusively of white students. As a professor at Crozer wrote in a letter of recommendation for King, “The fact that with our student body largely Southern in constitution a colored man should be elected to and be popular [in] such a position is in itself no mean recommendation.” From Crozer, King went to Boston University, where, in seeking a firm foundation for his own theological and ethical inclinations, he studied man’s relationship to God and received a doctorate (1955) for a dissertation titled “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman.”

    The Montgomery bus boycott of Martin Luther King, Jr.

    While in Boston, King met Coretta Scott, a native Alabamian who was studying at the New England Conservatory of Music. They were married in 1953 and had four children. King had been pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama, slightly more than a year when the city’s small group of civil rights advocates decided to contest racial segregation on that city’s public bus system following the incident on December 1, 1955, in which Rosa Parks, an African American woman, had refused to surrender her bus seat to a white passenger and as a consequence was arrested for violating the city’s segregation law. Activists formed the Montgomery Improvement Association to boycott the transit system and chose King as their leader. He had the advantage of being a young, well-trained man who was too new in town to have made enemies; he was generally respected, and it was thought that his family connections and professional standing would enable him to find another pastorate should the boycott fail.

    In his first speech to the group as its president, King declared:

    We have no alternative but to protest. For many years we have shown an amazing patience. We have sometimes given our white brothers the feeling that we liked the way we were being treated. But we come here tonight to be saved from that patience that makes us patient with anything less than freedom and justice.

    These words introduced to the country a fresh voice, a skillful rhetoric, an inspiring personality, and in time a dynamic new doctrine of civil struggle. Although King’s home was dynamited and his family’s safety threatened, he continued to lead the boycott until, one year and a few weeks later, the city’s buses were desegregated.

    The Southern Christian Leadership Conference

    Recognizing the need for a mass movement to capitalize on the successful Montgomery action, King set about organizing the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), which gave him a base of operation throughout the South, as well as a national platform from which to speak. King lectured in all parts of the country and discussed race-related issues with religious and civil rights leaders at home and abroad. In February 1959 he and his party were warmly received by India’s Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and others; as the result of a brief discussion with followers of Gandhi about the Gandhian concepts of peaceful noncompliance (satyagraha), King became increasingly convinced that nonviolent resistance was the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom. King also looked to Africa for inspiration. “The liberation struggle in Africa has been the greatest single international influence on American Negro students,” he wrote. “Frequently I hear them say that if their African brothers can break the bonds of colonialism, surely the American Negro can break Jim Crow.”

    In 1960 King and his family moved to his native city of Atlanta, where he became co-pastor with his father of the Ebenezer Baptist Church. At this post he devoted most of his time to the SCLC and the civil rights movement, declaring that the “psychological moment has come when a concentrated drive against injustice can bring great, tangible gains.” His thesis was soon tested as he agreed to support the sit-in demonstrations undertaken by local Black college students. In late October he was arrested with 33 young people protesting segregation at the lunch counter in an Atlanta department store. Charges were dropped, but King was sentenced to Reidsville State Prison Farm on the pretext that he had violated his probation on a minor traffic offense committed several months earlier. The case assumed national proportions, with widespread concern over his safety, outrage at Georgia’s flouting of legal forms, and the failure of Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower to intervene. King was released only upon the intercession of Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kennedy-an action so widely publicized that it was felt to have contributed substantially to Kennedy’s slender election victory eight days later.

    In the years from 1960 to 1965, King’s influence reached its zenith. Handsome, eloquent, and doggedly determined, King quickly caught the attention of the news media, particularly of the producers of that budding medium of social change—television. He understood the power of television to nationalize and internationalize the struggle for civil rights, and his well-publicized tactics of active nonviolence (sit-ins, protest marches) aroused the devoted allegiance of many African Americans and liberal whites in all parts of the country, as well as support from the administrations of Presidents Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson. But there were also notable failures, as in Albany, Georgia (1961–62), when King and his colleagues failed to achieve their desegregation goals for public parks and other facilities.

    The letter from the Birmingham jail of Martin Luther King, Jr.

    In Birmingham, Alabama, in the spring of 1963, King’s campaign to end segregation at lunch counters and in hiring practices drew nationwide attention when police turned dogs and fire hoses on the demonstrators. King was jailed along with large numbers of his supporters, including hundreds of schoolchildren. His supporters did not, however, include all the Black clergy of Birmingham, and he was strongly opposed by some of the white clergy who had issued a statement urging African Americans not to support the demonstrations. From the Birmingham jail, King wrote a letter of great eloquence in which he spelled out his philosophy of nonviolence:

    You may well ask: “Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches and so forth? Isn’t negotiation a better path?” You are quite right in calling for negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.

    Near the end of the Birmingham campaign, in an effort to draw together the multiple forces for peaceful change and to dramatize to the country and to the world the importance of solving the U.S. racial problem, King joined other civil rights leaders in organizing the historic March on Washington. On August 28, 1963, an interracial assembly of more than 200,000 gathered peaceably in the shadow of the Lincoln Memorial to demand equal justice for all citizens under the law. Here the crowds were uplifted by the emotional strength and prophetic quality of King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, in which he emphasized his faith that all men, someday, would be brothers.

    The rising tide of civil rights agitation produced, as King had hoped, a strong effect on national opinion and resulted in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, authorizing the federal government to enforce desegregation of public accommodations and outlawing discrimination in publicly owned facilities, as well as in employment. That eventful year was climaxed by the award to King of the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo in December. “I accept this award today with an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind,” said King in his acceptance speech. “I refuse to accept the idea that the ‘isness’ of man’s present nature makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal ‘oughtness’ that forever confronts him.”

    Challenges of the final years of Martin Luther King, Jr.

    The first signs of opposition to King’s tactics from within the civil rights movement surfaced during the March 1965 demonstrations in Selma, Alabama, which were aimed at dramatizing the need for a federal voting-rights law that would provide legal support for the enfranchisement of African Americans in the South. King organized an initial march from Selma to the state capitol building in Montgomery but did not lead it himself. The marchers were turned back by state troopers with nightsticks and tear gas. He was determined to lead a second march, despite an injunction by a federal court and efforts from Washington to persuade him to cancel it. Heading a procession of 1,500 marchers, Black and white, he set out across Pettus Bridge outside Selma until the group came to a barricade of state troopers. But, instead of going on and forcing a confrontation, he led his followers to kneel in prayer and then unexpectedly turned back. This decision cost King the support of many young radicals who were already faulting him for being too cautious. The suspicion of an “arrangement” with federal and local authorities—vigorously but not entirely convincingly denied—clung to the Selma affair. The country was nevertheless aroused, resulting in the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

    Throughout the nation, impatience with the lack of greater substantive progress encouraged the growth of Black militancy. Especially in the slums of the large Northern cities, King’s religious philosophy of nonviolence was increasingly questioned. The rioting in the Watts district of Los Angeles in August 1965 demonstrated the depth of unrest among urban African Americans. In an effort to meet the challenge of the ghetto, King and his forces initiated a drive against racial discrimination in Chicago at the beginning of the following year. The chief target was to be segregation in housing. After a spring and summer of rallies, marches, and demonstrations, an agreement was signed between the city and a coalition of African Americans, liberals, and labour organizations, calling for various measures to enforce the existing laws and regulations with respect to housing. But this agreement was to have little effect; the impression remained that King’s Chicago campaign was nullified partly because of the opposition of that city’s powerful mayor, Richard J. Daley, and partly because of the unexpected complexities of Northern racism.

    In Illinois and Mississippi alike, King was now being challenged and even publicly derided by young Black-power enthusiasts. Whereas King stood for patience, middle-class respectability, and a measured approach to social change, the sharp-tongued, blue jean-clad young urban radicals stood for confrontation and immediate change. In the latter’s eyes, the suit-wearing, calm-spoken civil rights leader was irresponsibly passive and old beyond his years (King was in his 30s)—more a member of the other side of the generation gap than their revolutionary leader. Malcolm X went so far as to call King’s tactics “criminal”: “Concerning nonviolence, it is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks.”

    In the face of mounting criticism, King broadened his approach to include concerns other than racism. On April 4, 1967, at Riverside Church in New York City and again on the 15th at a mammoth peace rally in that city, he committed himself irrevocably to opposing U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. Once before, in early January 1966, he had condemned the war, but official outrage from Washington and strenuous opposition within the Black community itself had caused him to relent. He next sought to widen his base by forming a coalition of the poor of all races that would address itself to economic problems such as poverty and unemployment. It was a version of populism—seeking to enroll janitors, hospital workers, seasonal labourers, and the destitute of Appalachia, along with the student militants and pacifist intellectuals. His endeavours along these lines, however, did not engender much support in any segment of the population.

    Meanwhile, the strain and changing dynamics of the civil rights movement had taken a toll on King, especially in the final months of his life. “I’m frankly tired of marching. I’m tired of going to jail,” he admitted in 1968. “Living every day under the threat of death, I feel discouraged every now and then and feel my work’s in vain, but then the Holy Spirit revives my soul again.”

    King’s plans for a Poor People’s March to Washington were interrupted in the spring of 1968 by a trip to Memphis, Tennessee, in support of a strike by that city’s sanitation workers. In the opinion of many of his followers and biographers, King seemed to sense his end was near. As King prophetically told a crowd at the Mason Temple Church in Memphis on April 3, the night before he died, “I’ve seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight that we, as a people, will get to the promised land.” The next day, while standing on the second-story balcony of the Lorraine Motel, where he and his associates were staying, King was killed by a sniper’s bullet. The killing sparked riots and disturbances in over 100 cities across the country. On March 10, 1969, the accused assassin, a white man, James Earl Ray, pleaded guilty to the murder and was sentenced to 99 years in prison.

              Source: Britannica.com

  • History This Week

    “We are not makers of history. We are made by history.”

    Martin Luther King, Jr.

    September 24

    September 24, 1957 – President Dwight Eisenhower ordered the National Guard to enforce racial integration of schools in Little Rock, Arkansas.

    September 24, 1980 – War erupted between Iran and Iraq as Iraqi troops crossed the border and encircled Abadan, then set fire to the world’s largest oil refinery.

    Birthday – John Marshall (1755-1835) was born in Germantown, Virginia. He was appointed by President John Adams to the position of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in January 1801. He became known as “The Great Chief Justice,” largely responsible for expanding the role of the Supreme Court through such cases as Marbury vs. Madison and McCulloch vs. Maryland.

    Birthday – American writer F. Scott Fitzgerald (1896-1940) was born in St. Paul, Minnesota (as Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald). Best known for This Side of Paradise, The Great Gatsby and Tender is the Night.

    Birthday – Puppeteer Jim Henson (1936-1990) was born in Greenville, Mississippi. He created the Muppets, including Kermit the Frog, and Bert and Ernie, entertaining and educating generations of children via the daily TV show Sesame Street.

    September 25

    September 25, 1513 – Spanish explorer Vasco Nunez de Balboa first sighted the Pacific Ocean after crossing the Isthmus of Panama.

    September 25, 1690 – The first American newspaper was published. A single edition of Publick Occurrences Both Foreign and Domestick appeared in Boston, Massachusetts. However, British authorities considered the newspaper offensive and ordered its immediate suppression.

    September 25, 1789 – The first U.S. Congress proposed 12 Amendments to the Constitution, ten of which, comprising the Bill of Rights, were ratified.

     Birthday – American writer William Faulkner (1897-1962) was born in New Albany, Mississippi. Best known for The Sound and the Fury and The Reivers.

    Birthday – Russian composer Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975) was born in St. Petersburg, Russia. He witnessed the Russian Revolution and went on to become one of the greatest Soviet composers.

    September 26

    September 26, 1687 – The Acropolis in Athens was attacked by the Venetian army attempting to oust the Turks, resulting in heavy damage to the Parthenon.

    September 26, 1918 – The last major battle of World War I, the Battle of the Argonne, began as a combined force of French and Americans attacked the Germans along a 40-mile front.

    September 26, 1960 – The first-ever televised presidential debate occurred between presidential candidates John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon. Many who watched were inclined to say Kennedy ‘won’ the debate, while those who listened only to the radio thought Nixon did better. Nixon, who declined to use makeup, appeared somewhat haggard looking on TV in contrast to Kennedy.

    September 26, 1984 – Britain agreed to allow Hong Kong to revert to Chinese sovereignty in 1997.

    Birthday – American folk legend Johnny Appleseed (1774-1845) was born in Leominster, Massachusetts (as John Chapman). For 40 years, he traveled through Ohio, Indiana and into Illinois, planting orchards. He was a friend to wild animals and was regarded as a “great medicine man” by Native Americans.

    Birthday – Writer T.S. (Thomas Stearns) Eliot (1888-1965) was born in St. Louis, Missouri. He rejected conventional verse and language in favor of free expression.

    Birthday – Composer George Gershwin (1898-1937) was born in Brooklyn, New York. Along with his brother Ira, he created enduring songs including The Man I Love, Strike Up the Band, I Got Rhythm and the opera Porgy and Bess.

    September 27

    September 27, 1964 – After a 10-month investigation, the Warren Commission Report was issued stating a lone gunman had been responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

    September 27, 1995 – The Israeli cabinet agreed to give Palestinians control of much of the West Bank which had been occupied by Israel for 28 years.

    Birthday – American revolutionary leader Samuel Adams (1722-1803) was born in Boston, Massachusetts. He was a passionate, vocal man who helped ignite the revolution and served as a delegate to the First and Second Continental Congresses. He was a signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.

    Birthday – American political cartoonist Thomas Nast (1840-1902) was born in Landau, Germany. He originated the symbols for the two main U.S. political parties, the Democratic donkey and the Republican elephant. Nast was also instrumental in destroying the Tweed Ring, a group of corrupt politicians plundering the New York City treasury.

    September 28

    September 28, 1066 – The Norman conquest of England began as Duke William of Normandy landed at Pevensey, Sussex.

    September 28, 1542 – California was discovered by Portuguese navigator Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo upon his arrival at San Diego Bay.

    September 28, 1978 – Pope John Paul I died after only 33 days in office. He was succeeded by John Paul II.

    September 28, 1995 – Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat signed an accord at the White House establishing Palestinian self-rule in the West Bank.

    September 29

    September 29, 1789 – Congress created the United States Army, consisting of 1,000 enlisted men and officers.

    September 29, 1829 – Britain’s “bobbies” made their first public appearance. Greater London’s Metropolitan Police force was established by an act of Parliament at the request of Home Secretary, Sir Robert Peel, after whom they were nicknamed. The force later became known as Scotland Yard, the site of their first headquarters.

    September 29-30, 1941 – Nazis killed 33,771 Jews during the Babi Yar massacre near Kiev.

    Birthday – Nuclear physicist Enrico Fermi (1901-1954) was born in Rome. While teaching at the University of Chicago, he developed a method of causing nuclear fission, producing a chain reaction releasing explosive nuclear energy which led to the development of the Atomic bombs.

    September 30

    September 30, 1938 – British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain returned to England declaring there would be “peace in our time,” after signing the Munich Pact with Adolf Hitler. The Pact ceded the Czechoslovakian Sudetenland to the Nazis. Chamberlain claimed the agreement meant peace, however, Hitler seized all of Czechoslovakia in March of 1939.

    September 30, 1949 – The Berlin Airlift concluded after 277,264 flights carrying over 2 million tons of supplies to the people of West Berlin, who were blockaded by the Soviets.

    September 30, 1955 – Actor James Dean was killed in a car crash in California at age 24. Although he made just three major films, Rebel Without a Cause, East of Eden and Giant, he remains one of the most influential actors.

    September 30, 1966 – Nazi war criminals Albert Speer and Baldur von Schirach were released from Spandau prison after serving 20 years. The prison, originally built for 600 inmates, was left with only one prisoner, former Deputy Führer Rudolf Hess.

    Birthday – American writer Truman Capote (1924-1984) was born in New Orleans, Louisiana (as Truman Streckfus Persons). He took the last name of his stepfather, becoming Truman Capote. Best known for Breakfast at Tiffany’s and In Cold Blood.

  • OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT BIDEN

    OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT BIDEN

    Ravi Batra

    Compensation Is Due from China; and If We Were Pearl Harbored, Then Reparations too- Ravi Batra

    New York based attorney Ravi Batra, on 14thApril 2020 wrote an open letter to then President Trump making out a case against China for the pandemichavoc, which has taken away millions of lives, created terrible health issues, and ruined the global economy. Mr. Batra called upon President Trump to demand from China due compensation from China for causing colossal losses in terms of men and material to America and Americans, and additionally, if China Pearl Harbored America, reparations. A year later, Mr. Batra wrote an open letter to President Biden repeating his accusation against China and asking the US President to demand due compensation, and reparation, if required.

    We are publishing here Mr. Batra’s open letter to President Biden, without editing it. -EDITOR

    “April 13, 2021

    H.E. Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

    President of the United States of America

    H.E. Nancy Pelosi

    Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives

    H.E. Chuck Schumer

    Majority Leader, U.S. Senate

    Re: 1 Year after My April 14, 2020 “Open Letter” – M/O Novel Coronavirus Aka Covid19 Aka “2019-n-CoV” or “2019-nCoV” – Compensation Is Due from China; and If We Were Pearl Harbored, Then Reparations too.

    Honorable President Biden, Speaker Pelosi, and Majority Leader Schumer:

    As an un-conflicted American, I love and admire the Chinese culture; always have, and find Confucius wiser as I age. With God’s Grace I and my family survived Covid19 on or about March 29, 2020. Treating this Virus as a cancer case that I needed to crack, and after learning biochemistry and epidemiology during an intense effort, I did so, and a year ago, on April 14, 2020, I wrote a 6-page “Open Letter” to then-President Trump, Speaker Pelosi and then-Senate Majority Leader (“OL”; copy enclosed, with uniform spelling of “Wuhan”), and for POTUS, emailed it to a former Marine: Deputy NSA Matt Pottinger at 8:31pm. In the OL, I had the science, the facts, and recommendations, including, bringing our “supply chains” home. The next day, April 15, 2020, about 1 p.m. the United States opened a preliminary investigation into inter alia the origin of SARS-CoV2 from PLA-run Wuhan Virology Lab, and the motives of CCP China in causing its global-spread without sounding a pandemic-alarm directly or thru the WHO. I remain grateful for the start of the April 15, 2020 “all hands-on deck” Investigation.

    It remains an open secret that my analysis was and is correct, and that this is a lab-created Frankenstein that transplanted the “Spike Glycoprotein(S)” (“Spike”) from Bats – a unique feature in bats, as they are either “cold” or “warm” blooded, and still, a warm Bat can procreate with a cold Bat due to the “Spike.” OL at 3. I called “Covid19,” aka “Wuhan Virus,” a Trojan Horse, as its Spike feature does not cause our immune system to sound an alarm upon infection (and the T-cells remain asleep). Disturbingly, CCP has not turned over, to this day, the genome of Patient Zero who was admitted in Wuhan hospital on or about December 1, 2019, while a different protein string-virus was released on or about December 31, 2019 at the Wuhan Wet Market. The animal farms about 1000 miles away from Wuhan, did not experience a Covid19 outbreak, thereby decimating the WHO’s coddled-team’s report, after a 3-hour chaperoned visit to the Wuhan Virology lab, falsely asserting a virus jump from an animal to a human.

    WHO dishonored its high fiduciary obligations, and did not promptly alert the leaders of every nation that a pandemic was afoot and ask to lock-down CCP’s China. President Trump said we were fighting an invisible enemy. I disagree; the cascading events in just the South China Sea – from creating Mischief Reef, to sinking of Filipino Fishing boats with Fishermen to their death, to sinking Vietnamese Fishing boats, to the recent squatting of 245 Chinese Militia ships, lashed together to appear as part of “9-Dashes” in Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone – are in violation of inter alia the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”). The Virus is surely invisible, but this string of protein, despite its lab-based default programing, has no animus towards us and does not benefit by causing death and destruction – and by my last count, our needlessly dead well exceed our losses at Pearl Harbor. A substantial question arises: is Covid19 a biowarfare agent? The death and destruction we have suffered suggests a motivated animus, which is a human phenomenon that renders us unworthy in the eyes of God.

    Despite Truth-in-Labeling laws, CCP has succeeded in blocking this Virus from being origin-labeled by deeming it racist. Our misguided citizens criminally attacking innocent law-abiding Asian-Americans has provided cover, while shaming us as a nation that celebrates diversity, and staining E Pluribus Unum. Our shameful chapter of interning innocent and loyal Japanese-Americans during WWII, when we did no such thing to German-Americans while fighting Nazi Germany, is a lesson we need to learn perpetually, exactly, as Kristallnacht teaches: remember always. It is a singularly important ingredient in our effort to form a more perfect union – a point recently well made by Secretary Blinken in Anchorage.

    I write to seek from you dear and respected President Biden, given your distinguished tenure and natural God-given abilities – a clear American policy – both as to our injury from Covid19 and holding the sending-nation reasonably responsible (turnover all biomedical information, indemnify our losses, etc.), and to restore global peace and security, by avoiding a war if we can. Indeed, pre-Covid19, troubled by the years-long effort by China to create Mischief Reef into a military base, in September 2017, I had a respectful conversation with China’s distinguished FM Wang Yi, which in sum and substance, I explained the above facts and said, you are inviting a little war now or a big war later, and since I don’t like wars, I prefer a little war now. Minister Wang, with concern, immediately responded: No war! No war!, and left to end this conversation.

    Diplomacy is always needed, even to arrange a surrender to end a war. It has been reported that President Xi, whom I consider to be at least as much an exceptional mastermind as Chairman Mao was, if not more, has asked his diplomatic corps to unsheathe their swords to be Wolf Warriors – a function or definition that defies diplomacy, even as it weaponizes it. Given that backdrop, we, as hosts at Captain Hook Hotel in Anchorage on March 18, 2021 – instead of a protocol-based public welcome, private candid talks, and a public press conference at the end – started with our honest expressions in public. In a moment that evokes – albeit, in part – a declaration of independence [sadly, from us], CCP’s Foreign Affairs Chief Yang Jiechi effortlessly responded in public, what I believe was intended for private talks. We are at the cusp of a modern-day Gordian Knot.

    While I take note of William Stanton’s recent April 9, 2021 piece on “Agents of Influence,” I particularly take note of former NSA H.R. McMaster’s May 2020 piece in The Atlantic, entitled “How China Sees the World,” I freely admit that it was our then-President Nixon who opened the world for China and granted CCP a permanent seat on the UNSC. Whether we have a rules-based or law-based system of sovereigns co-existing in the comity of nations, we ought not be in the position of having to pick between the ever-reasonable and well-calibrated go-along and get-along Neville Chamberlain or Winston Churchill as being necessary to maintain our cherished freedoms and never surrender our sovereignty. Methinks, a new joint Yalta and Brentwood Conference is needed, before over-due structural reforms can occur, and global peace and security re-harnessed, without endless regional wars.

    Mr. President, you and I have had several meaningful exchanges, including, in the White House, and most relevantly, in the UN’s Hall of Flags in Fall 2015 – when I urged you to run in 2016, as an election you were born for – to revive the American Dream. The American Dream belongs more to everyday Americans, than Wall Streeters, custodians of international money and achiever of maximum profit, as it was everyday Americans in 1814 who during heavy bombardment of Fort McHenry, kept our Flag high by paying the ultimate sacrifice repeatedly, and caused Francis Scott Key to pen our Star-Spangled Banner. Please let it wave high, and free, in this 21st Century.

    If I can assist, as you wished of me during our substantive talk in the Hall of Flags, as a citizen-patriot, devastated by January 6th more than by 9/11, I would be happy to re-find diplomacy’s respect-based ability to “round the edges” and fashion justice-based remedies that are equitable – as the Jesuits teach us everything must be. Sometimes, davening with the right Minyan helps to be better able to turn swords into ploughshares. As Honor and WWIII walk into the ring to face off, the time is now for your leadership to make foreign policy into domestic policy – just as your infrastructure plan is our OBOR/BRI within our borders. Retail solutions will not work in the East or in the West; but, wholesale solutions will turn adversaries into allies. God Bless you, and continue to Bless these United States of America – I prefer “united,” the verb.

    Respectfully,

    /S/

    Ravi Batra

    Encl: April 14, 2020 Open Letter to POTUS et al

    C: Leader Addison Mitchell McConnell, Jr., Leader Kevin McCarthy, HFAC Chairman Greg W. Meeks, Ranker McCall, Chair Carolyn B. Maloney, Ranker Jim Jordan, SFRC Chairman Bob Menendez, Ranker Risch, Secretary Anthony Blinken, Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, NSA Jake Sullivan.”

  • Today We Are All Asian

    By Wallace Ford

     Yesterday (March 16), another member of the Tribe of Armed and Angry White Men decided that it would be a good thing to kill as many Asians as he could find in massage spas in and around Atlanta. He managed to kill eight people, six of whom were Asian. The other two just happened to discover that their Sell By date was yesterday. In other words, the other two were just collateral damage in the continued hate war being waged by the Tribe of Armed and Angry White Men. And in that war, anyone and everyone stands the risk of being collateral damage. In that sense, we are all Asian. Just as we are all Black. We are all Latino. We are all Muslims. We are all Indigenous people. We are all LGBTQI members. We are all Jews. Because in hating and targeting all of the above, the Tribe of Armed and Angry White Men doesn’t care who gets in the way. And they certainly don’t care who dies. Yesterday it was six Asian women who committed the capital crime of Being Asian and Working. About a year ago it was Armaud Arberry who committed the capital crime of Jogging While Black in an Atlanta suburb. In August 2019 it was 23 Latinos in El Paso who committed the capital crime of Being Latino in A Public Place. And in 2017 it was Heather Heyer who committed the capital crime of Demonstrating for Justice with Black People in Charlottesville. And in 2018 it was 11 Jews worshiping in a synagogue who committed the capital crime of Being Jews.

    Of course, the behavior which cost these men and women their lives are only capital crimes in the twisted universe of white supremacist domestic terrorists. These men (and women) have been letting us know who they are for years and the response of the public and law enforcement has been tepid at best. All of the referenced atrocities are considered isolated events and not part of the obvious pattern of white extremist violence which is committed to maintaining white minority rule in this nation, no matter the human or institutional cost.

    We saw the savage combination of white supremacy and white privilege on January 6, 2020 when a mob that would have warmed the heart of the Ku Klux Klan in days gone past, stormed the capital – ostensibly to keep 45 as president – but…there were Confederate flags and Nazi paraphernalia present — clear signs that white supremacy was coursing through the veins of these so-called “good people”.

    History shows quite clearly how this country responds when it perceives a domestic threat. Look at what happened to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and Paul Robeson among thousands of others accused of being part of some Russian conspiracy to overthrow the government.

    Look at what happened to the Black Panther Party when its members asserted the constitutional right of Black people to exercise their Second Amendment rights (the irony is apparent). And look what happened to Martin Luther King, Jr. when the Federal Bureau of Investigation considered him to be “the greatest domestic threat” in the country.

    A Black man preaching nonviolence in the quest for justice is a domestic threat. A tribe of white supremacist domestic terrorists are considered to be either misunderstood or misguided, but certainly not a national threat.

    Attorney General Merrick Garland has stated that he considers domestic terrorism to be a national threat. But he needs to be more specific – it is white supremacist domestic terrorism that is a true national threat. And unless and until this nation confronts this danger from within, every American citizen is in danger of being in the cross hairs of this renegade tribe.

     

    And that is why today we are all Asian.

  • Remembering Martin Luther King Jr. on his 92nd birthday

    Remembering Martin Luther King Jr. on his 92nd birthday

    Minister, civil rights activist, and public opinion leader who changed the face of America

    January 15, 1929, Atlanta, Georgia

    Died

    April 4, 1968, Memphis, Tennessee

    Spouse

    Coretta Scott King

    Accomplishments

    Leader of African American Civil Rights Leader

    Nobel Peace Prize (1964)

    Presidential Medal of Freedom (1977)

    Congressional Gold Medal (2004)

    Famous letters and speeches

    “I have a dream” Speech

    Letter from Birmingham jail

    Letter to Coretta

    Our God is Marching On (How Long? Not Long)

    Martin Luther King Jr. became the predominant leader in the civil rights movement to end racial segregation and discrimination in America during the 1950s and 1960s, and was a leading spokesperson for nonviolent methods of achieving social change. His eloquence as a speaker and his personal charism—combined with a deeply rooted determination to establish equality among all races despite personal risk—won him a worldwide following. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 and was selected by Time magazine as its Man of the Year. His “I Have a Dream “speech, which is now considered to be among the great speeches of American history, is frequently quoted. His success in galvanizing the drive for civil rights, however, made him the target of conservative segregationists who believed firmly in the superiority of the white race and feared social change. He was arrested over 20 times and had his home was bombed. Ultimately, he was assassinated on April 4, 1968, on the balcony of a motel where he was staying in Memphis. A monument to Dr. King was unveiled in the national capital in 2012.

    Early Life of Martin Luther King Jr.

    Martin Luther King Jr. was born Michael Luther King Jr., in Atlanta, Georgia, on January 15, 1929. His father, in a 1957 interview, said that both he and his son were supposed to be named for the leader of the Protestant Reformation but misunderstandings led to Michael being the name on birth records. The boy became the third member of his family to serve as pastor of the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, following in the footsteps of his grandfather and father. His training and experience as a minister undoubtedly contributed to his renowned oratorical style and cadence.

    He also followed the educational path taken by his father and grandfather: he got his education in Georgia’s segregated public schools (from which he graduated at age 15). And he received a B.A. degree from Atlanta’s Morehouse College, a traditionally black college. He then went on to study theology at Crozer Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania, an integrated school where he was elected president of his senior class although it was comprised primarily of white students. In 1955, he received an advanced degree from Boston College in Massachusetts; he had completed the residence for his doctorate two years earlier. (In 1991, a Boston University investigatory committee determined he had plagiarized portions of his doctoral dissertation; plagiarism was also discovered in his word at Crozer. However, the committee did not recommend his degree be revoked. Evidence of plagiarism had been discovered by Boston University archivists in the 1980s.)

    While in Boston, he met and married Coretta Scott, who would be his lifetime partner in both marriage and his campaign for civil rights. In 1954, the couple moved to Montgomery, Alabama, where King had been hired as the pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church.

    He was already active in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, America’s leading African-American organization. At the time of his move to Montgomery, he was a member of its executive committee, and in December 1955, he led a 382-day boycott of Montgomery’s segregated public bus system. Negroes, the term then used for those of African descent, were relegated to the back of the bus and forced to give up their seats if a white person wanted to sit. Since many blacks lived in poverty or near-poverty, few could afford automobiles, and public busses were essential to them for traveling to and from work and elsewhere. During the boycott, King became a target for segregationists. Personal abuse, arrest, and the bombing of his home made clear the risks he would be taking if he continued to work with the movement for civil rights.

    In 1957, that movement spawned a new organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, to focus on achieving civil rights. King was elected president. By dropping reference to Negroes or colored people in its title and instead using the term “Christian Leadership” the organization was declaring its goals were not just those of one race but should be those of all Christian people. King strongly influenced the ideals of the organization.

    During the next 11 years, he would speak over 2,500 times at public events, traveling over six million miles. He also wrote articles and five books to spread the message farther. In 1963, he was a leader in the massive civil rights protests at Birmingham, Alabama, that drew the attention of all America—indeed, of the entire world—to the discrimination African Americans faced and their demands for change. Arrested during the protests, he penned “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” which became a manifesto for the civil rights revolution and placed King among America’s renowned essayists such as Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson.

    Civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on Aug. 28, 1963, in Washington.

    Influence of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

    His tactics for achieving social change were drawn from those of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (known as Mahatma, “great soul”), who had used nonviolent civil disobedience to bring about change in his native India (as he had done with some success previously to win concessions for Indian immigrants living in South Africa’s apartheid system). Gandhi’s methods included boycotts of British goods and institutions. (Like Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi was repeatedly arrested and ultimately was assassinated by a fanatic.)

    Although King stressed nonviolence, even when confronted by violence, those who opposed change did not observe such niceties. Protestors were beaten, sprayed with high-pressure water hoses, tear-gassed, and attacked by police dogs; bombings at black churches, homes, and other locations took a number of lives; some—both black and white—who agitated for civil rights such as the right to vote were murdered, but the movement pressed on.

    King was the most prominent leader in the drive to register black voters in Atlanta and the march on Washington, D.C., that drew a quarter-million participants. His message had moved beyond African Americans and was drawing supporters from all segments of society, many of them appalled by the violence they saw being conducted against peaceful protestors night after night on television news.

    Martin Luther King’s Nobel Peace Prize

    His oratory and impassioned drive, not just for equality under the law, but for true understanding and acceptance of all races and creeds by all races and creeds, led Time magazine to select Martin Luther King, Jr., as its Man of the Year for 1963. The following year, the Nobel Prize Committee in Stockholm, Sweden, awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize. Then 35, he is the youngest man ever to have received it. The prize included an award of over $54,000, which he promised to donate to the furtherance of the civil rights movement.

    As the Vietnam War escalated, King spoke out against America’s involvement in the conflict. His antiwar position was an outgrowth of his belief in nonviolence, but to those who opposed King it intensified their belief he was pro-Communist and anti-American.

    Martin Luther King, Jr. Assassinated

    In the spring of 1968, King traveled to Memphis, Tennessee, where the majority of the city’s black sanitation workers had been striking since February 12 for increased job safety measures, better wages and benefits, and union recognition. The mayor, Henry Loeb, staunchly opposed all these measures. King was solicited to come to Memphis to lead a planned march and work stoppage on March 28.

    Funeral procession for Martin Luther King, Jr., April 9, 1968, Atlanta. 

    That protest march turned violent when sign-carrying students at the end of the parade began breaking windows of businesses, which led to looting. One looter was killed and about 60 people were injured. The city of Memphis lodged a formal complaint in the U.S. District Court against King and several other leaders of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. He and those leaders negotiated with the factions among the workers and their supporters who had initiated the march.

    Assured that they would observe the creed of nonviolent civil disobedience, King agreed to return to Memphis for the rescheduled march on April 5. The district court had issued a restraining order, however, representatives of the SCLC met with the judge on April 4 and worked out a broad agreement that would permit the protest march to be held on April 8. Details were to be worked out on April 5.

    On the evening of April 4, one of the SCLC representatives, Andrew Young (who would later serve as President Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the United Nations and would be elected mayor of Atlanta), came to King’s room at the Lorraine Motel and informed him of what had been worked out with the judge. They prepared to go out to dinner, along with their colleagues. When King stepped onto the balcony in front of his room, he was shot and killed. He was just 39 years old. In direct contrast to the nonviolence he had preached, riots broke out following Martin Luther King, Jr.’s death. In Chicago alone, nearly a dozen people died, 350 were arrested for looting, and 162 buildings were destroyed by arson.

    Martin Luther King Jr’s Legacy

    By the time of Martin Luther King Jr.’s death, the civil rights movement was evolving; in some ways, it seemed to be leaving him behind. New black power activists did not accept his philosophy of nonviolence as a way to achieve their goals. The FBI was breaking the power of the Ku Klux Klan, which had stood squarely in the way of racial equality. After successfully campaigning for Carl Stokes, the first black mayor of Cleveland, King was not invited to the victory celebration. The next civil rights challenges, such as fighting poverty, were more abstract compared with the clarity of issues like discrimination in hiring and the use of public amenities. These new concerns would likely have proven more difficult for him to achieve the same levels of success as he had in his previous campaigns for equality and justice. On the last Saturday of his life, he mused about quitting his full-time role in the movement, though he seemed to talk himself out of that, according to one of his fellow activists, Jesse Jackson.

    Yet, the lasting legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. as a vibrant catalyst for social change cannot be denied. Among the prominent legacies of his ability to organize and energize the movement for equality are the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. His birthday has become a national holiday, when government offices and many private businesses close to honor his memory. A portion of the Lorraine Motel, including two persevered rooms and the balcony on which he was assassinated, are part of the National Civil Rights Museum. King’sbirthplace is now part of the National Park System.

    His eloquent words live on, inspiring others who see injustices and seek to change them. He had a dream, and though it is still a long way from being fully realized, the America of his racially segregated youth and that of today’s integrated society—in which a black man was elected president of the United States having served two full terms from 2008-2016—are as far apart and different from each other as the planet Mars is from Neptune. It is impossible to imagine such sweeping change would occur as quickly as it did without a leader like Martin Luther King Jr. driving it forward.

    But 60 years after the March on Washington, there is no gainsaying that Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” has entered American public culture as “the oratorical equivalent of the Declaration of Independence,” as Hansen puts it. If its fame threatens to swamp the balance of King’s legacy, and if its stature directs historical memory only toward the brightest and not the bleakest days of the 1960s black freedom movement, it nonetheless remains the most notable oratorical achievement of the 20th century—a “sort of a Gettysburg Address” indeed.

    (This article was written by David J. Garrow and originally published in August 2003 issue of American History Magazine. Courtesy / HistoryNet)