The Delhi High Court on Friday , Jan 30, issued notices to the Union government, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), and InterGlobe Aviation Ltd, which operates IndiGo Airlines, in response to a public interest litigation challenging the aviation regulator’s decision to allow relaxations under the revised Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) framework. During the hearing, the DGCA firmly told the Court that the mandatory weekly rest requirement for pilots has not been relaxed for any airline. Appearing on behalf of the regulator, advocate Anjana Gosain submitted that weekly rest provisions continue to remain fully enforceable and untouched. “Weekly rest is non-negotiable. It cannot be interfered with. No relaxation has been granted to any airline on this count,” Gosain informed the Bench, requesting that the statement be formally recorded. She clarified that the only concession provided by the DGCA relates to night operations, and that too is temporary, valid only until February 10, 2026. The relaxation, she said, has been granted solely to facilitate operational adjustments during the transition to the revised regime. The PIL contends that the DGCA has, in effect, placed the revised FDTL regulations in abeyance until February 10, 2026, and argues that the regulator lacks statutory authority to suspend or defer notified safety norms governing pilot fatigue and passenger safety.
Related Articles
Other News
INDIA PUT MIND ON MATTER AHEAD OF PAKISTAN CLASH
ADELAIDE (TIP): If the Indians are looking for inspiration, the venue of their practice session on February 12 could not have been better. Founded in 1847, St Peter’s College is noted for its famous alumni, […]
India
Key verdicts of Supreme Court of India
The year 2020 was a roller-coaster for the world in many ways. From the raging coronavirus pandemic to India-China border standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh to death of former […]
India
People don’t even have drinking water: SC junks plea on standards
New Delhi (TIP)- The Supreme Court on Thursday, Dec 18, disapproved of what it termed an “urban-centric approach” to public interest litigation, refusing to entertain a plea seeking fresh and stricter standards for polyethylene terephthalate […]

Be the first to comment