Tag: United States Politics

 

  POLITICS & POLICY  

  • Russian Spies answer Trumps call ~ Hack Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign

    Russian Spies answer Trumps call ~ Hack Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign

    Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign along with other Democratic Party organisations has been hacked as part of a larger cyber attack, law enforcement officials said on Friday night.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Justice Department has launched a probe against the latest hack that follows two data breaches involving the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DNCC), CNN reported.

    “An analytics data programme maintained by the DNC, and used by our campaign and a number of other entities, was accessed as part of the DNC hack,” said Clinton campaign spokesman Nick Merrill.

    “Our campaign computer system has been under review by outside cyber security experts. To date, they have found no evidence that our internal systems have been compromised,” CNN quoted Merrill as saying

    The intrusion was discovered by private investigators hired by the campaign, according to the law enforcement officials.

    The private investigators believed that it was similar to the DNC hack, but federal investigators were still working to determine the scope and nature of the intrusion, the officials said.

    The Justice Department’s national security division, which was already investigating the DNC intrusion, is handling the probe because of the believed similarities, CNN reported citing the officials as saying.

    The DCCC, which is the political arm for House Democrats, confirmed on Friday it had been the subject of a cyberhack, raising the possibility that alleged Russian hackers might have breached a much broader swath of Democratic records than originally thought.

    The revelation comes just days after the leak of thousands of Democratic National Committee emails — US officials allege Russian hackers — prompted major turmoil within the party, causing the abrupt resignation of its chairwoman, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, reports CNN.

    The FBI’s chief of cyber investigations James Trainor told CNN in an interview recently that hackers have targeted political party entities and think tanks in Washington.

    The official said there is a long list of intrusions that the FBI and other agencies were also investigating.

    Hacking has become a major flashpoint in the presidential race. Revelations about targeting the Clinton campaign come as the two nominees — Republican party’s Donald Trump) are set to begin receiving national security briefings, CNN noted.

    Trump earlier in the week drew criticism for appearing to suggest that Russia should use espionage to find Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails.

    The Republican nominee later tried to walk back the comments by saying that he was only being sarcastic.

  • Democratic Convention, Philadelphia July 25-28, 2016Obama Steers 2016 Presidential Election away from Trumpism

    Democratic Convention, Philadelphia July 25-28, 2016

    Obama Steers 2016 Presidential Election away from Trumpism

    PHILADELPHIA (TIP): Barack Obama, July 27 made a powerful endorsement of Hillary Clinton as the next US President, saying no one including himself was ever more qualified than his former secretary of state, as Democrats united against “homegrown demagogues” like Republican rival Trump who sell “fear and cynicism”.

    The two-time president, also the first black to have occupied the top post, said he was “ready to pass the baton” to his rival in 2008 as he painted an optimistic picture of an “already great nation”.

    “I can say with confidence there has never been a man or a woman-not me, not Bill (Clinton), nobody-more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as president of the United States of America,” Obama said amid deafening cheers from thousands of delegates and guests packed into a sports arena here.

    In his 45-minute fiery speech, the most high-profile in the ongoing Democratic national convention, Obama asked Americans to shun “cynicism and fear” being propagated by the 70-year-old reality TV star.

    “And now I’m ready to pass the baton and do my part as a private citizen. So this year, in this election, I’m asking you to join me, to reject cynicism and reject fear and to summon what is best in us; to elect Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States and show the world we still believe in the promise of this great nation,” he said.

    Obama, 54, said the November 8 presidential elections were a “fundamental choice” about what the country is and the very “meaning of our democracy”, and “not just a choice between parties or policies; the usual debates between left and right.”

    He endorsed Clinton for having a first-hand knowledge of the challenges that come with the job and contrasted it with the lack of experience of the Republican nominee – a non-politician.

    “You know, nothing truly prepares you for the demands of Oval Office. Until you’ve sat at that desk, you don’t know what it’s like to manage a global crisis, or send young people to war. But Hillary’s been in the room; she’s been part of those decisions.

    “He (Trump) is not really a plans guy. Not really a facts guy, either. He calls himself a business guy, which is true, but I have to say, I know plenty of businessmen and women who’ve achieved success without leaving a trail of lawsuits, and unpaid workers, and people feeling like they got cheated,” he said.

    The third day of the convention also witnessed Vice President Joe Biden making an emotional valedictory speech and Virginia Senator Tim Kaine formally nominated as vice-presidential candidate.

    “Ronald Reagan called America ‘a shining city on a hill’. Donald Trump calls it ‘a divided crime scene’ that only he can fix. It doesn’t matter to him that illegal immigration and the crime rate are as low as they’ve been in decades, because he’s not offering any real solutions to those issues. He’s just offering slogans, and he’s offering fear. He’s betting that if he scares enough people, he might score just enough votes to win this election,” he added.

    “That is another bet that Donald Trump will lose. Because he’s selling the American people short. We are not a fragile or frightful people,” Obama said.

    Obama said democracy doesn’t work if people constantly demonize each other.

    “She (Hillary) knows that for progress to happen, we have to listen to each other, see ourselves in each other, fight for our principles but also fight to find common ground, no matter how elusive that may seem,” he said.

    Making a passionate plea to elect Hillary as his successor, Obama said time and again, they have elected him. “Tonight, I ask you to do for Hillary Clinton what you did for me. I ask you to carry her the same way you carried me,” he said.

    Indian-Americans in spotlight at democratic convention

    The growing clout of Indian-Americans in US politics came to spotlight as three leaders from the community took the center stage at the ongoing Democratic National Convention that anointed Hillary Clinton as party’s presidential nominee

    Neera Tanden
    Neera Tanden

    Neera Tanden in her political debut at the national stage of the Democratic party, made a strong case for Clinton as the next president of the US

    Ami Bera
    Ami Bera

    Ami Bera, an Indian-American Congressman, in his brief appearance said: “As the only South Asian member of Congress, as a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, I support Hillary Clinton because she is the only candidate that understands the complexity of the world and is prepared from day one to lead America.”

    Raja Krishnamoorthi
    Raja Krishnamoorthi

    Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Indian-American Democratic Congressional candidate from Illinois, has been introduced as one of the party’s emerging leaders during the convention.

     

     

    Tim Kaine Accepts Vice-Presidential Nomination  

    Tim Kaine is the running mate of Hillary Clinton
    Tim Kaine is the running mate of Hillary Clinton

    Democrats gathered in Philadelphia formally selected Tim Kaine as their US vice-presidential candidate, completing the party’s ticket for the November election. Kaine, a 58-year-old senator from the battleground state of Virginia, was nominated by voice vote

    The tickets are now set for both parties: Hillary Clinton and running mate Kaine for the Democrats, with Republicans Donald Trump and running mate Mike Pence, both of whom were nominated last week and their party’s convention in Cleveland.

    With working-class roots and a spotless record both as Virginia governor and senator, he is seen as helping Clinton garner support among reluctant independent male voters-although at the risk of alienating the party’s progressive left wing.

    Prez Trump? God help us: Bloomberg to voters 

    Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg labeled Trump a conman
    Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg labeled Trump a conman

    Independent former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg told divided Americans it was time to unite behind Hillary Clinton in order to defeat “demagogue” Donald Trump “Trump says he wants to run the nation like he’s running his business? God help us,” Bloomberg, who like Trump is a billionaire businessman, told the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia

    “I’m a New Yorker, and I know a con when I see one.” He issued stinging rebukes to Trump, describing him as singularly unfit for the presidency and calling his business plan “a disaster in the making.”

  • DEMOCRATS DISPLAY UNITY AND ELAN AT THE CONVENTION

    DEMOCRATS DISPLAY UNITY AND ELAN AT THE CONVENTION

    Democratic Convention concluded July 28, with powerful endorsement of Hillary Clinton as the President of USA and an exultant Hillary accepting the nomination.  In sharp contrast with the visible divisions and rancor in the Republican camp at the Republican Convention in Ohio a week earlier, Democrats succeeded in presenting an image of unity, despite differences which are too well known by now. The most bitter foe of Hillary Clinton during primaries to the run up to the convention, Bernie Sanders, while acknowledging policy perception differences with Hillary, came up with a strong endorsement of Hillary, much to the chagrin and disappointment of his followers.

    Scores of party stalwarts and dignitaries spoke at the Convention. While Michelle Obama was widely acclaimed for her polished and moving speech, Michael Bloomberg’s barbs on Trump did not fail to amuse the gathering.

    However, it was for Obama to win the most admiration and appreciation as he spoke of what democracy is and what leadership is. He clearly steered the 2016 presidential election away from Trumpism when he called upon Americans “to reject cynicism and fear” being propagated by the 70 year old New York Realty Moghul Donald Trump, and “summon what is best in us”.

    Hillary Clinton., accepting the nomination, spoke of what she believes in and what she would do as President. She spoke of the priorities she has on mind which all aim at ensuring security and peace not only in America but also in the world. Her speech threw up quite a few quotable statements. “America is great because America is good.” “Our democracy isn’t working as it should”. “Wall Street will never again be allowed to rip Americans”.

    Hillary’s speech touched upon all aspects of life of all sections of people. Referring to young students, she said Bernie and she would work together for free college education and for a new set of rules governing student loans. Creating more opportunities, more jobs, raise in wages are the areas she said she would address on priority. “None of us can do it alone”, she said. “Together” we can achieve our cherished goals was the message from the Democratic Presidential nominee. As for Donald Trump, she seemed to pity him. She dismissed him as a man with no ideas, no vision,offering no solutions to problems. “Donald offers no change. He has only words”.

    The impressive array of endorsements, the impressive display of unity, and the exposition of democratic nominee’s vision bode well for Hillary Clinton. All eyes are now on Tuesday, November 8, 2016.

  • The finest Obama Moment:  Lessons in Leadership in Times of Trouble

    The finest Obama Moment: Lessons in Leadership in Times of Trouble

    Thursday (July 28) morning, many of us found ourselves riveted to television screens, listening to President Barack Obama deliver one of the most substantive and wise speeches by any world leader in recent years. Of course, he was speaking at the Democratic Party’s National Convention in Philadelphia. Such conventions in American politics are primarily tribal gatherings, with well-honed rites and rituals of endorsement, denunciation and demonization. Expectedly, Obama did all that – and, then a bit more. He ended up educating the Americans and the rest of the world in the principles and practices of leadership.

    Obama, in his speech at the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia said leadership meant "creating the possibility for people of goodwill to join and make things better".
    Obama, in his speech at the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia said leadership meant “creating the possibility for people of goodwill to join and make things better”.

    In outlining differences between Hillary Clinton and her Republican opponent, Donald Trump, President Obama reflected on what constitutes leadership, particularly in these troubled times when the world order is looking somewhat frayed. These reflections were worth every penny because this is the time when political leaders, especially in the West, are being fashionably run down as unable and ill-equipped to address the concerns of their disillusioned, disenchanted and disenfranchised citizens. The masses are supposed to be in some kind of ‘revolt’ against the political classes. Suddenly, the world over, there appears be a clamor for the boorish demagogue, who does not care for the so-called elites and their expertise and addresses himself, instead, directly to the modern equivalent of the unwashed millions. The damage such demagogues can inflict on a society’s political and social stability was very much evident in the recent British referendum on the European Union. Britain is no exception. All over, inciters and imposters are finding victims among gullible and confused citizens.

    In Philadelphia, Obama spoke up against this global current of demagogic sales-pitch. In endorsing Hillary Clinton and indirectly depreciating Donald Trump, Obama sought to wean the Americans and other citizens the world over from the seductive charm of the slogan-mongers. (We in India are not unfamiliar with this phenomenon and its bewitching potential. We have even coined a name for it, too: jumala-baazi). Obama courageously cautioned against those who seek to use the pulpit to fan “resentment, and blame, and anger, and hate.” The demagogue preys on the citizens’ anxieties about a world the national governments are no longer able to cope with, leave alone control and coerce.

    President Obama has the experience and the credentials to be critical of Donald Trump for “not offering any real solutions” and, instead, “just offering slogans, and offering fear.” Despite being a partisan at a patently partisan show, Obama’s censure does underscore the complexities of the modern-day government.

    Presiding over a country – any country – is a complicated affair. Everyone wants change and every two-penny bit of a politico promises change with a capital C. But what Obama managed to underline was the stark reality: there are no teach-it-yourself manuals for the business of government, the science of governance and the art of governing. It is easy to promise and not all that easy to deliver. He was warning not just the Americans but also the voting citizens all over the world: beware of the man who sells a quick-fix. There are no quick-fixes, as we have been discovering for ourselves since May 2014.

    Democratic voices and forces all over the world would be grateful to President Obama for reminding us once again that a democracy does not depend upon one person. Instead, the beauty of democracy is that its resilience and resourcefulness empower one and all: “Our power does not come from a self-declared savior promising that he alone can restore order. We don’t look to be ruled.” In making this assertion, Obama raised his voice against the ever-present weakness for the megalomaniac and against the shaman and his black bag of magic medicines.

    A democratic polity, be it in India, America or England, is an arrangement of institutions and processes and protocols. A democratic system intrinsically frowns upon potential Caesars and other purveyors of personality cult. Authority in democracy can only be an institutionalized exercise of power.

    Leadership means not just arousing the passions and animosities of your followers; it means enlisting the support and cooperation of your rivals once the vote is over. “It’s creating the possibility for people of goodwill to join and make things better,” Obama proposed.

    An essential corollary of this proposition is that a true leader is not intimidated by talent around him or her, is not afraid of other brilliant and bright men and women, and does not surround himself with mediocrities and second-raters. In our own case, at the most critical moment of modern history, Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Patel, though rivals, made a formidable diarchy; and, with the Mahatma’s blessing, they were willing to -and, did – share power and space and public gaze with those who were not their political associates in the fight against the British. The post-Independence leadership felt secure enough to invite ‘rivals’ and outsiders to be part of the Cabinet and become partners in the great task of rebuilding the new Indian State.

    An essential element of leadership has to be a capacity to work with other people. Not a one-man show. As Obama noted that “even when you’re 100 per cent right, getting things done requires compromise. That democracy does not work if we constantly demonize each other.” (His admonition can well be directed at Arvind Kejriwal’s AAP government and its equally unsparing rivals in the Modi sarkar).

    As Obama would tell us, leadership is not about instigating followers to a civil war; nor is it about deepening society’s divisions and fault-lines. Leadership is about tapping collective positive impulses and energy. Or, as Obama put it, cultivating and nurturing “bonds of affection; that common creed.” Leadership is about summoning citizens to rise above their petty animosities and prejudices. Invoking inclusiveness is a primary obligation for any leader because every country is a divided society. Obama was brilliant and courageous in acknowledging the diversity among the Americans “whether they wore a cowboy hat or a yarmulke; a baseball cap or a hijab.” We should certainly be able to feel the import of these words at a time when the majority in India feels itself empowered enough to beat up the minorities. But Obama argued that politics of togetherness will always trump the politics of divisiveness. “We are stronger together,” he intoned.

    And, summoning togetherness is not at all easy a task. Because that involves offering a moral leadership. Obama exhorted the Americans to “reject cynicism, reject fear, to summon what’s best in us.” This is not just an American requirement; this is an axiom that has to be valid and relevant in every country around the world.

    (Yale alumnus author is a former Media Advisor of the Indian Prime Minister. He remained in Prime Minister's Office from June 2009 to January 2012)
  • Hillary makes history as Dem nominee

    Hillary makes history as Dem nominee

    PHILADELPHIA: The US is just one step shy of electing its firstever female President. Already , Hillary Clinton has made history, with the Democratic Party formally nominating her on Tuesday as their presidential candidate -the first woman in the country’s 240-year modern, democratic existence to become the standard-bearer of a major political party .

    “I can’t believe we just put the biggest crack in that glass ceiling yet,” Clinton told party loyalists. “If there are any little girls out there who stayed up late to watch, let me just say: I may become the first woman president, but one of you is next,” she added.

    The momentous occasion came with theatre worthy of a vibrant, raucous and transparent democracy . An epic intraparty battle concluded on the floor of the Democratic National Convention when Hillary’s socialist rival Bernie Sanders formally ceded the fight after pacifying his diehard supporters with a roll call vote so their choice and voice could be heard and recorded. Then, Sanders himself proposed Hillary Clinton’s nomination with acclamation by delegates.

    Six hours later former President Bill Clinton, famed for his silver-tongued oratory , deployed his gift for storytelling to draw a compelling portrait of a spouse who was at once a driven policy wonk, a tireless activist and a fabulous mother who now deserved her place in the political sun. In a 45-minute address, he cited numerous in stances of how she wrought policy changes as a lawyer, a senator and as secretary of state, calling her the “real deal” and contrasting her energy and intellectual heft with an opponent who has no record of public service and no ideas, and who he suggested was a “cartoon alternative”.

    “She is still the best darn changemaker I have ever known,” the man who could be America’s First Gentleman told the party flock -still boiling with skeptics.

    Among them was actress Susan Sarandon, a Bernie supporter, who like many of his camp followers believe the Clintons are a dodgy couple who are part of an old order that will maintain a status quo in which the elites rip off ordinary people while pretending to work for them. (PTI)

  • “America is Great because America is Good” : Hillary Clinton

    “America is Great because America is Good” : Hillary Clinton

    PHILADELPHIA (TIP): US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said on July 28 the challenges facing Americans demand steady leadership and a collective spirit, contrasting her character with what she described as a dangerous and volatile Donald Trump.

    In the biggest speech of her more than 25-year-old career in the public eye, Clinton accepted the Democratic presidential nomination for the Nov. 8 election with a promise to make the United States a country that worked for everyone.

    “We are clear-eyed about what our country is up against. But we are not afraid,” she said.

    She presented a sharply more upbeat view of the country than her rival Trump did when he was formally nominated for president at last week’s Republican convention, and even turned one of Republican hero Ronald Reagan’s signature phrases against the real estate developer.

    “He’s taken the Republican Party a long way, from ‘Morning in America’ to ‘Midnight in America,’” Clinton said. “He wants to divide us – from the rest of the world, and from each other.”

    She portrayed Trump as volatile, saying “a man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons.”

    While her speech lacked the electrifying qualities of President Barack Obama and a parade of other prominent Democratic speakers, Clinton spoke authoritatively and with self-assurance in her pitch to the American public.

    She acknowledged some people still do not know her well.

    “I get it that some people just don’t know what to make of me. So let me tell you. The family I’m from, well no one had their name on big buildings,” Clinton said in a reference to Trump. She said her family were builders of a better life and a better future for their children, using whatever tools they had and “whatever God gave them.”

    As she prepared to deliver her speech, people familiar with the matter said the FBI is investigating a cyber attack against another Democratic Party group, which may be related to an earlier hack against the Democratic National Committee.

    The previously unreported incident at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, or DCCC, and its potential ties to Russian hackers, are likely to heighten accusations, so far unproven, that Moscow is trying to meddle in the US election to help Trump.

    Clinton said it would be her “primary mission” to create more opportunities and more good jobs with rising wages, and to confront stark choices in battling determined enemies and “threats and turbulence” around the world and at home.

    ‘Moment of reckoning’
    “America is once again at a moment of reckoning. Powerful forces are threatening to pull us apart,” said Clinton, a former secretary of state. “No wonder people are anxious and looking for reassurance – looking for steady leadership.”

    Clinton, who is vying to be the first woman elected US president, called her nomination “a milestone.”

    “When any barrier falls in America, for anyone, it clears the way for everyone. That’s why when there are no ceilings, the sky’s the limit,” the 68-year-old Clinton said in a speech that capped the four-day nominating convention.

    The evening sounded at times more like a traditional Republican convention than a Democratic one. During retired General John Allen’s remarks, chants of “USA!” filled the hall and large flags were brought in to be waved. Speakers, some of whom included military and police officers, made frequent mentions of religion and patriotism.

    “I certainly know that with her as our commander-in-chief, our foreign relations will not be reduced to a business transaction, I also know that our armed forces will not become an instrument of torture,” said Allen.

    Clinton embraced her reputation as a policy wonk, offering a litany of proposals for tuition-free college, infrastructure investment, immigration reform, gun control, affordable child care, paid family leave and more.

    Clinton also reached out to Republicans and to followers of primary rival Bernie Sanders, the democratic socialist US senator from Vermont. His supporters chanted at times during her speech only to be drowned out by her supporters. “Your cause is our cause,” she said.

  • Donald Trump selects Mike Pence as VP: Pence has accepted the offer

    Donald Trump selects Mike Pence as VP: Pence has accepted the offer

    NEW YORK (TIP): Pence, a former congressman and the current governor of Indiana, flew from Indianapolis to the New York area Thursday, July 14, ahead of a planned Friday morning joint appearance with the presumptive Republican nominee in Manhattan.

    But Trump said Thursday, July 14 evening he’s postponing the official announcement, previously set for Friday morning “in light of the horrible attack in Nice, France, I have postponed tomorrow’s news conference concerning my vice presidential announcement,” he tweeted.

    Trump maintained during an interview on Thursday evening that he has not made a “final, final decision,” although sources with knowledge of the pick said Pence would be Trump’s ultimate choice. He also indicated that he will announce tomorrow when the rescheduled VP announcement will be held.

    Trump’s team was impressed with Pence’s fiery performance at a rally in Westfield, Indiana on Tuesday, July 12 night. The governor and his wife met at their home with the candidate, his son, daughter and son in-law on Wednesday, June 13 morning, stoking further speculation that he would be Trump’s ultimate choice.

    Sources close to Pence and Trump were preparing for the likelihood of a Pence pick early Thursday but warned that the final choice would be made by the candidate alone.

    Without confirming that he was not the choice, Gingrich – who had been viewed as the most likely alternative, said in an interview Thursday that “it was a very great honor to be considered” for the job.

  • Clinton receives long-awaited endorsement from Sanders

    Clinton receives long-awaited endorsement from Sanders

    Bernie Sanders, whose calls for a “political revolution” energized millions of voters across the nation, offered a long-awaited endorsement of his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton today, calling for unity just two weeks shy of the Democratic National Convention.

    Standing alongside one another at an event in Portsmouth, N.H., Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, congratulated Clinton for winning the nomination and vowed to do everything he can to help her beat presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.

    “Hillary Clinton understands that we must fix an economy in America that is rigged and that sends almost all new wealth and income to the top one percent,” Sanders said, listing his reasons for endorsing her.

    “Hillary Clinton understands that if someone in America orks 40 hours a week, that person should not be living in poverty.”

    Democrats have coalesced around Clinton’s candidacy since she defeated Sanders in primaries last month in California and five other states, led by endorsements from President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and others.

    Sanders has spent the past month seeking to influence the party’s platform at the Philadelphia convention and promote electoral reforms including allowing independents to participate in future primaries.

    The platform includes many of his proposals, including a USD 15 an hour minimum wage, tougher restrictions on Wall Street and an end to the death penalty.

    The event at a Portsmouth high school sought to project Democratic unity before Republicans formally nominate Trump next week in Cleveland but some Sanders’ supporters in the crowd did not appear to be ready to move on.

    Chants of “Bernie” broke out in the gymnasium while opening speakers addressed the crowd, prompting Clinton’s faithful to chant, “Unity.” When Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, a Clinton supporter, told the audience, “We need to elect Hillary,” some Bernie supporters stood and shouted, “No,” which was followed by chants of “Hillary” in the crowd.

    “It’s like he’s giving up if he endorses her,” said Steve Rand, a hardware store owner from Plymouth, New Hampshire, before the two candidates took the stage. “She stands for everything that I am against,” he added.

  • Sanders to Join Clinton on Campaign Trail; Media Reports

    Sanders to Join Clinton on Campaign Trail; Media Reports

    Bernie Sanders has apparently decided to turn over a new leaf.

    Sanders will join Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, at a campaign event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, on Tuesday where he’s poised to endorse Clinton.

    The rivals will come together to “discuss their commitment to building an America that is stronger together and an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top,” the campaigns announced in statements early Monday.

    The appearance comes after the firebrand Vermont senator scored several symbolic victories at the Democratic Platform Committee meeting in Orlando, Florida.

    Although Sanders has not yet conceded to Clinton, nor endorsed her, some expect such language at the rally as Sanders was successful in including causes like climate change and $15 minimum wage on the Democratic platform over the weekend. “I think it’s fair to say that the Clinton campaign and I, our campaign, are coming closer and closer together,” Sanders said Saturday.

    In the February primary, Sanders beat Clinton in New Hampshire by 22 points. Jeva Lange

  • Haters, get over it: Hillary Clinton isn’t going to jail over emails, Benghazi

    Haters, get over it: Hillary Clinton isn’t going to jail over emails, Benghazi

    On the heels of Independence Day, the FBI gave America a belated 240th birthday present: Hillary Clinton won’t be going to prison over Emailgate.

    Haters, get over it.

    The anti-Hillary crowd has been poking us with that stick during her entire presidential campaign, casting doubt on her viability, planting innuendo about her character and working nonstop to make us think that they somehow knew something the rest of us didn’t.

    Tuesday, investigators announced that Clinton did nothing criminally wrong by using her personal email account while handling classified information as secretary of state. It removed a potentially damaging legal barrier from the campaign trail and cleared a pile of rubbish from her path to the White House. And it happened just in the nick of time.

    Think of it this way: A President Hillary Clinton is the only thing standing in the way of a President Donald Trump.

    This isn’t necessarily the gift that everyone had hoped for. And it didn’t come wrapped in a tidy, cheerful package. It fact, it was handed over to us in a rather messy heap. No one expects every American to be excited about it. But over time, many of us likely will come to appreciate it.

    The email scandal was supposed to be the smoking gun in the Republicans’ two-year Benghazi probe. As it turned out, the conspiracy theories cracked wide open under the microscope and exposed the Benghazi inquest for exactly what it was – an $8 million taxpayer-funded Republican campaign to derail Clinton’s presidential prospects.

    Obama campaigns with Clinton after FBI rule out criminal charges over ’emailgate’

    They were once bitter political rivals but Hillary Clinton now has outgoing President Barack Obama backing her in the race to the White House. (Euronews)

    As hard as they tried, congressional Republicans couldn’t come up with a strand of proof that Clinton had been derelict in her duties as secretary of state concerning the 2012 attacks in Libya that killed four Americans. There was nothing in their 800-page report issued last week that proved she engaged in professional misconduct.

    Still, the Republican smear campaign has caused major collateral damage, most notably among Democrats. Some in her own party have bought into Trump’s “crooked Hillary” hype and have done their fair share of spreading the venom.

    So far, former Bernie Sanders supporters can’t seem to muster any enthusiasm for Clinton, the person most likely to be at the top of the Democratic ticket in November. And by refusing to throw his own support behind the presumptive nominee, Sanders, in effect, is telling them that it’s OK.

    The next president of the United States isn’t going to be Libertarian Gary Johnson or the Green Party’s Jill Stein. A vote for either one of them is nothing less than a vote for Trump.

    GOP to investigate FBI decision on Clinton emails
    So in the words of Queen Elsa, it’s time to let it go.

    Sanders supporters fought a good fight. But in the end, he just couldn’t convince enough Democrats that he could ever get his pie-in-the sky agenda through our polarized Congress.

    We get it that many Americans are tired of the Washington establishment and want to see real change come about in America. Sanders supporters opted for idealism, romanticism, a crusade.

    The rest of us Democrats were seeking someone with experience, a proven track record and enough political stamina to trample Trump in the general election.

    Trump has made attacks on Clinton’s character the centerpiece of his presidential campaign. And though Sanders supporters insist that they despise him, some of the most vile criticism of Clinton has come from them.

    A friend told me the other day that while she can’t vote for Sanders in November, she would never “ruin my life’s integrity” by voting for Hillary Clinton. She detests Clinton’s “lack of character, her lies, her cold manipulations, her obvious phony demeanor.”

    Specifically, she is convinced that Clinton manipulated primary votes, enticed the media to underreport Sanders’ widespread support among constituents and only cares about minorities and issues such as poverty, education and crime when it’s politically expedient.

    This particular friend is both smart and politically savvy – but she has convinced herself that her single vote for a third-party candidate won’t make any difference in the November election.

    The problem with that rationale is that she’s not the only person thinking that way. There could be lots of votes thrown away on candidates who can’t win, and the majority of those ballots would hurt Clinton.

    Those of us who actually like Clinton and believe that she is the most qualified presidential candidate America’s had in a long time are tired of the smear tactics. But that doesn’t mean she shouldn’t have to answer tough questions.

    Another friend told me that until she explains how a major Clinton foundation donor with no foreign policy experience ended up appointed to the International Security Advisory Board that he would have to “hold his nose” to vote for her.

    No one understands the challenges that lie ahead better than Clinton. On a recent stop in Chicago, she acknowledged that after “25 years’ worth of wild accusations,” she’s got to earn voters’ trust. It’s time we give her a chance.

    We don’t expect Trump to let up on Benghazi. Remember that he and other birthers refused to acknowledge that President Barack Obama was born in the United States, even after he presented his birth records.

    But we should expect better from those who share our political values. If Democrats aren’t careful, we could end up with a family of Trumps in the White House.

    While we’re engaged in our family feud over whether Hillary Clinton is a liar, the Trump team is huddling on the sidelines, waiting for a chance to steal.

  • US State Department to reopen probe into ‘#emailgate’ | Hillary Clinton

    US State Department to reopen probe into ‘#emailgate’ | Hillary Clinton

    WASHINGTON (TIP): In a dramatic turnaround, the US State Department has said it will reopen its own probe into the allegations that presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton violated rules by using a private email server while she was secretary of state.

    “Given the Department of Justice has now made its announcement, the State Department intends to conduct its internal review,” State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement. Earlier, the State Department had suspended its own investigations after the FBI started its investigation into the matter. The US Department of Justice on Wednesday, July 6, had closed the case and decided against filing any charges against Clinton.

    “I cannot provide specific information about the Department’s review, including what information we are evaluating,” Kirby said. The internal probe is likely to include several of Clinton’s personal staff including Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan. “We will aim to be as expeditious as possible, but we will not put artificial deadlines on the process. Our goal will be to be as transparent as possible about our results, while complying with our various legal obligations,” Kirby said. “I’m not able to make commitments today one way or the other about what we will be able to disclose?” he asked in a statement.

  • FBI director says Hillary Clinton did not lie, break law in email handling

    FBI director says Hillary Clinton did not lie, break law in email handling

    WASHINGTON (TIP): FBI director James Comey told lawmakers on July 7 that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton did not lie to the FBI about her handling of emails as secretary of state and did not break the law.

    Comey told a Republican-led oversight panel in the US House of Representatives that no reasonable prosecutor would charge Clinton with a crime over her use of private email servers while she was secretary of state, some of which were used to transmit classified information.

  • BREXIT–A “Leave” vote puts UK on the path of disintegration

    BREXIT–A “Leave” vote puts UK on the path of disintegration

    It was certainly a black Friday – not the kind that we are used to after thanksgiving holiday – for the stock markets.

    The reason for that was not some economic news but rather political one: Brexit. It was a vote on the referendum whether to remain in European Union or Leave.

    Right before the referendum vote, there was feeling that pro-EU forces would prevail but the result was quite opposite: the “leave” vote prevailed by 52-48 margin letting loose a political earthquake of magnitude 10.

    The result was clearly seen in the reaction of the stock markets which tumbled across the globe wiping out ‘trillions’ in wealth and investors rushing to the safety of US bonds (which Trump wants to negotiate in order to reduce US debt, if he becomes President, notwithstanding the fact that all US debt is constitutionally guaranteed) and gold.

    Before we delve into what happens next, here is a quick and interesting fact about the vote: those belonging to 18-24 age group voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU but those in the 65+ age group – the older white generation -voted to leave the EU.

    This brings forth the glaring contrast between the viewpoints of two groups: The age group 18-24 years exhibited more tolerance, inclusiveness of all cultures and more progressive outlook towards the world – just like the view point held by the youth generation in US.

    But those who voted for leaving the EU – a majority of 65+ age group representing a dying generation – exhibited a mindset that is not able to come to terms with the changing society in modern times and wants to cling back to the old times which are crumbling due to technological advances, more tolerant younger generation and globalization of economy. A similar trait is exhibited by the whites in US who are feeling that “their way of life” is under assault.

    The foremost question is: now what happens?

    First possibility is that many nations in EU would also like to have the referendum like UK.

    Denmark had its own referendum last year but it was more towards deciding how much power to give to unelected officials in Brussels.

    Dutch leader Geert Wilders – a firebrand Islamophobe – has already called for having similar referendum to decide about Dutch member ship in EU.

    Then there is Marine Le Pen – a far right French leader – who is widely popular in France and if she becomes President then France could also see something along the lines of UK referendum. Hungary’s Victor Orban is no friend of EU and has also hinted at the referendum.

    If that happens then EU could find itself on the verge of disintegration.

    On the other hand, there is likelihood that UK would be just an anomaly. Other member nations would resolve to make EU a more cohesive force but with reforms that would lessen the authoritarian grip of Brussels on the member nations.

    David Cameron wanted to leave the painful matter of separation to his successor, but EU leaders like Jean-Claude Juncker, Angela Merkel, and Donald Tusk etc. have called for speedy divorce opining that there is no reason to wait for Cameron’s successor.

    Which means EU might decide to make separation for UK as painful as possible – in the areas of trade, immigration etc. – and as an example in order to deter other members who might harbor such notion of referendums.

    UK itself could face the negative reaction to the “leave” vote. There is a possibility that businesses could flee to Ireland or other EU countries triggering job losses and plunging the nation into recession causing untold economic damage.

    Besides that, the question of Scotland’s independence could again come up. Scotland has overwhelmingly voted to remain in the EU but England has opted to leave which would open up Scottish independence question.

    Scottish Minister Nicola Sturgeon has expressed no confidence in London’s government and hinted that Scottish independence referendum could be in the cards.

    If that happens – a very high probability – then by voting to leave the EU, UK may also have set itself up for disintegration.

    That would be quite ironic.

  • Polls Indicate Clinton Leads over Trump in Battleground States

    Polls Indicate Clinton Leads over Trump in Battleground States

    NEW YORK (TIP): As of June 30, major polls have indicated Clinton is leading over Trump in battleground States.

    According to Ballotpedia’s battleground poll, Clinton leads Trump across the board in battleground states. Ballotpedia finds Clinton leading Trump 51% to 37% in Florida; 45% to 41% in Iowa; 50% to 33% in Michigan; 48% to 38% in North Carolina; 46% to 37% in Ohio; 49% to 35% in Pennsylvania, and 45% to 38% in Virginia.

    Each of the seven States surveyed is seen as a swing state where either party is normally seen as relatively competitive in presidential elections, though Michigan has gone Democratic in most recent presidential elections.

    Ballotpedia surveyed roughly 600 voters in each of the States between June 10-22 for the poll and each survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

    Separate polling in three battleground States, conducted by Quinnipiac University, found a much tighter race: Clinton up 8 points in Florida, but only 1 point in Pennsylvania and a tie in Ohio.

    A Quinnipiac University national poll released Wednesday, June 29 shows Hillary Clinton leading Trump by just two points, 42%to 40%, a much closer race than other recent surveys have shown. With third-party candidates included, Clinton leads 39% to 37%, with Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson at 8% and Green Party candidate Jill Stein at 4%.

    This Quinnipiac poll is quite different from other recent surveys on the presidential race, showing a much tighter contest than others. Its field period overlaps with those of the Washington Post/ABC News and NBC News /Wall Street Journal polls released Sunday, June 26, both of which found Clinton significantly ahead of Trump.

    Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by six points, 44% to 38%, in a Fox News poll of registered voters released Wednesday, June 29, marking an uptick from similar polls released in May and June.

    The Fox News results follow a rough patch for the Trump campaign: In May, the presumptive Republican nominee enjoyed a three-point lead in the same survey. But by early June, those numbers had flipped, with Clinton jumping out to a 42% to 39% advantage.

    CNN’s Poll of Polls — an average of results for the five most recent publicly released national polls that meet CNN’s standards for publication — has Clinton leading Trump 46% to 40%.

    Her lead among women in this latest round –51% to 32% — outpaces Trump’s with men, where his edge has dwindled to 10 points, 46%to 36%.

    The state of the race remains essentially unchanged when Libertarian Gary Johnson is thrown into the mix.

    Johnson wins 10% of the vote in a three-way competition, taking about equally from Trump and Clinton, whose lead scales down to 41% to 36%.

    Despite having seen off his last primary rival nearly eight weeks ago, Trump also lags behind Clinton on the party unity front.

    His lead among Republicans is down to 74%from 82% in May. And only 52% of registered GOP voters who had previously supported one of his opponents picked the billionaire businessman over Clinton.

    On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders voters appear more willing to shed their primary loyalties and back the party’s likely nominee.

    Two-thirds of the Sanders backers surveyed said they would vote for Clinton over Trump. Overall, 83% of Democrats plan to support Clinton in November.

  • President Obama, Hillary Clinton to campaign together, with first stop in NC on July 5: Staff

    President Obama, Hillary Clinton to campaign together, with first stop in NC on July 5: Staff

    WASHINGTON (TIP): US President Barack Obama will hit the campaign trail for the first time with presumptive Democratic White House nominee Hillary Clinton next Tuesday, July 5, in North Carolina, her staff announced.

    “In Charlotte, President Obama and Hillary Clinton will discuss building on the progress we’ve made and their vision for an America that is stronger together,” Clinton’s campaign said in a statement. Their debut joint campaign appearance for the 2016 election had been scheduled for June 15 in the state of Wisconsin, but was postponed due to the massacre in Orlando, Florida — the worst mass shooting in US history.

    Obama came out and endorsed Clinton on June 9 after months of assiduously avoiding tipping the scales of the Democratic presidential primaries.

    “I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office,” Obama said in a video message that day as he offered his full-throated endorsement of the former secretary of state, senator and first lady.

    “I’m with her, I am fired up, and I cannot wait to get out there and campaign for Hillary,” added Obama, who won a brutal, months-long Democratic primary battle against Clinton in 2008.

    Their joint appearance comes with US Senator Bernie Sanders refusing to bow out of the race for the Democratic nomination, despite rival Clinton amassing the necessary number of delegates to clinch it outright at next month’s party convention.

    Clinton, aiming to make history as the nation’s first female commander in chief, is expected to square off against Republican billionaire businessman Donald Trump in November’s general election.

  • Heart & Brain Harken to Times Gone: 2016 an Electoral Twister

    Heart & Brain Harken to Times Gone: 2016 an Electoral Twister

    We live in such interesting and exciting times – which time-tested Chinese wisdom says ought to be avoided on penalty of being cursed. Dickens, however would be in his glory, and say, “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.” Wow, reading that gem of timely wisdom leaves one breathless!

    Two dozen candidates started out seeking POTUS 45; all are gone from this wretched and ignoble 2016 race except Trump, Hillary and Bernie. Just last week, Russia’s president Putin charmingly told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria that the United States is the sole Superpower. The world’s nations’ geo-political calculus is in a tizzy – unable to even rely upon Jimmy the Greek in Vegas, as nobody knows what will be.

    Of them, Hillary has broken the Final Glass Ceiling as the presumptive Democratic Nominee. Hillary of course is beyond experienced in world and domestic affairs, given her tenure of public service and her engaging in same as a happy cook does in a kitchen: with abandon, to whip up an exciting meal. Of course, the clean-up of the “dust up” is a job for others. It’s worth noting that after Barack Obama absolved us of our original Sin – slavery – by being elected as the present day lofty Mark Anthony – he met with Bernie in the Oval Office and issued a most moving video endorsement of Hillary across the cold digital divide, sans the glow and warmth of a June Day in the Rose Garden, standing shoulder to shoulder, as he did with the ever-loveable Joe Biden, the natural champion of the Middle Class.

    Undeniable it is that Bernie has lit the imagination of millions upon millions of Americans who feel that their American Dream was defalcated while Wall Street and other Power & Money centers in USA got obese, repeatedly, beyond AIG’s Credit Swaps, with TARP money – trillions of dollars taken from beat up Main Street and the perpetual Poor, itself a sin in America, for Wall Street. The same Wall Street, which crashed the world’s economy in 2007 and did a Harry Houdini act with every American’s 401k and had home-equity go deep sea diving; conduct unbecoming a person with honor, if not outright criminally offensive. Bernie supporters want the 1789 Viva La France “guillotined heads” from our institutions of government. Of course, Bernie sits waiting to be asked to speak in Philadelphia and be crowned the Hard Working American’s Champ, as well as waiting for Straight Arrow FBI Director James Comey, of Ashcroft-Alberto Gonzales fame recorded by Preet Bharara as Chuck Schumer’s Chief Counsel, and fearlessly Impartial AG Loretta Lynch – who will do what the law demands and her Honor-based Oath. The question everyone wonders, will lightning actually strike, but more importantly, will it strike before July 25th. Law, it should be known, is at its best when it ignores human and political calculus of self-gain, and does what it must, or not at all, if it can’t. Human honor, differs from Law’s honor; the former is more compassionate by comparison.

    I pause to recall with emphasis that when the late great Socrates walked the Agora and frustrated the powerful in the direct democracy that was Athens, his reward for seeking accountability of government was a double-Hemlock death syrup for a frail 70-year old who merely asked, “Why?” Our democracy has discovered that representative democracy is needed to permit deliberation, rather than mere mob-rule that is emotion-driven or emotionally excited to silly heights and depths. Luckily, we have circuit breakers beyond the ballot box, as in the Electoral College. The Two Party system is another circuit breaker. The media, when functions properly, is another circuit breaker. However, since the Arab spring, social media has done to mainstream media what the atom bomb did to Hiroshima. In case my point is unclear, let me state it thus: social media can take representative democracy and make it act like direct democracy of Athens.

    And then there is Trump; the OMG candidate for president of these United States. In a civilian businessman capacity, he loved being called The Donald. Now, it is the distant: Mr. Trump. The Trump candidacy, if it can be called that, when it’s actually a mudfest, is a perfect recipe for social media to love or hate, but never ignore. Unique to Trump is that he has earned a very lofty status during this campaign: The Teflon Tongue. Ask any politician and they will give up both legs and arms to be so blessed by the electorate. It took Ronald Reagan all the way past the Iran-Contra affair in 1986 to win the Teflon President title. Recall as you must, that in the Carolinas on the same day Donald Trump called Pope Francis disgusting, because the Pope deems a good Christian to build bridges not walls of separation, and later the same evening Trump professed his love and respect for Pope Francis while attacking the media for misreporting the Pope. All that aside, is it not amazing that Donald Trump has electrified a slice of Americana that yearns for the America of yesteryears – when political correctness did not hide the evil that can lurk in a human heart, but allowed it to flourish in broad daylight proudly.

    The ultimate question each of us must answer is this: as a citizen of the most exceptional nation in human history, which has guaranteed freedom of speech, press, association and religion, and an unending pursuit of happiness, must such a great nation serve only the selfish needs of one man or one woman or one family, or must it continue to be the beacon in human history that it is strong, compassionate, daring, defiant, disruptive, innovative, welcoming, confident, fearless, and other attributes of human heroes across the globe have defined by their deeds over time – for that is what America is and what every American can be.

    I want an American President worthy of the American citizenry: hard-working, loyal, and honorable.

    Oh, there is one ultimate circuit breaker in our great representative democracy, a nation of laws: the law itself. What government does not know how to do properly or justly, or refuses to do at all, the law will make it so.”

    Ravi Batra-1
    Ravi Batra

    The author is an eminent attorney based in New York. He can be reached at ravi@ravibatralaw.com

    Follow on Twitter @RaviBatra

  • Indian American Republican Abhay Patel to run for Senate from Louisiana

    Indian American Republican Abhay Patel to run for Senate from Louisiana

    NEW ORLEANS (TIP): 40-year-old Indian-American economic development professional has declared his candidacy for the US Senate from Louisiana.

    Abhay Patel, from New Orleans, is one of the six Republicans to have entered into this race the seat of which has been vacated by Senator David Vitter who announced last year that he would not seek re-election for the seat.

    Currently, the Vice President of business development for the New Orleans Business Alliance, Mr. Patel is a former Wall Street investment banker who at one time raised in excess of USD 30 billion for transactions like Hertz’ acquisition of Dollar Thrifty.

    “I’m not a career politician. I’m a businessman who learned about hard work and sacrifice by watching my immigrant parents,” Mr. Patel said yesterday while announcing his candidature.

    “Over my career, I’ve advised some of our nation’s most important companies, led economic development and promoted the overall growth of our local, state and national economy,” he said making his case to the people of Louisiana.

    Observing that for Louisiana to thrive, however, Washington must get out of the way, he said the US Constitution was written to control the size and scope of the federal government, but today Washington controls every aspect of American life.

    “I am a Republican who will fight tirelessly to defend our Constitution and to ensure that the people of Louisiana have the power to control our own destiny,” said Mr. Patel, whose parents are immigrants from India.

    In an interview to a media outlet, Mr. Patel said that he wants to improve India-US relationship.

    “India is fast becoming one of our closest allies and it is important that we continue to grow this burgeoning relationship,” he said.

    “With China to its east and Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran to its west, India’s geography makes the nation a critical partner in helping the US and its allies achieve regional and global stability and security.

    “In addition, the US can benefit from India’s rising economy, bringing new opportunities in trade, investment, and technology,” Mr. Patel said.

  • Hillary Clinton’s VP shortlist has leaked

    Hillary Clinton’s VP shortlist has leaked

    NEW YORK (TIP): On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal’s Laura Meckler and Colleen McCain Nelson broke the news that Hillary Clinton is vetting Elizabeth Warren for the vice presidency – but not vetting Bernie Sanders. In the process, they provided a shortlist of candidates that Clinton is considering.

    Beyond the Massachusetts  senator, other prospective candidates include Labor Secretary Tom Perez, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro; Sens. Tim Kaine of Virginia, Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Cory Booker of New Jersey; Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, and Reps. Xavier Becerra of California and Tim Ryan of Ohio, several Democrats said.

    Now, this isn’t necessarily an exhaustive list, and Meckler and Nelson note that the vetting is still in early stages, using publicly available information rather than asking candidates to submit tax returns and the like.

    Nonetheless, this list is the best information we’ve gotten about who Clinton is considering, and it includes some names that haven’t popped up in prior media speculation. All of these candidates have obvious strengths that have put them on this list, but of course, they each have their weaknesses as well.

  • Bernie Sanders Refuses to Concede Democratic Nomination to Hillary Clinton

    Bernie Sanders Refuses to Concede Democratic Nomination to Hillary Clinton

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders promised in a video address on June 15 night to continue his political revolution, declining to concede the Democratic nomination to Hillary Clinton despite losing a majority of votes to his rival.

    Still, he vowed in his video address to do whatever he could do to help Clinton defeat Donald Trump in a general election, promising to work with her to “transform the Democratic Party.” “Election days come and go. But political and social revolutions that attempt to transform our society never end. They continue every day, every week and every month in the fight to create a nation of social and economic justice,” Sanders said, speaking in his video address from Burlington, Vermont. “That’s what the political revolution is about and that’s why the political revolution must continue into the future.”

  • Eric Schneiderman on #OrlandoShooting

    Eric Schneiderman on #OrlandoShooting

    This weekend’s tragedy in Orlando – the worst mass shooting in our nation’s history – was not only an act of terrorism, but an unspeakable hate crime directed at our LGBTQ brothers and sisters. The nation’s outpouring of support for the grieving families has been inspirational. But as we mourn, we must also come together to confront the challenge of combating terrorism here at home. Together, we must demand that Congress finally pass common sense gun control measures that can prevent the loss of innocent lives to gun violence.

    Fortunately, Hillary Clinton is doing exactly that, and reminding us of every American’s unalienable right to feel safe and welcome in our country. Sadly, Donald Trump is doing the opposite and even trying to divide us. Just one day after the massacre, Trump called for a ban on all Muslims entering the United States.

    Vilifying the entire Muslim community based on the actions of one terrorist is profoundly un-American. It goes against everything we stand for as a country founded on religious freedom. And it will make us less safe.

    The response to hatred cannot be more hatred. Now is the time for us to come together and work towards the America we need and deserve.

  • Bracing for a #Trump Presidency

    Bracing for a #Trump Presidency

    Harish_khare_240x180
    Harish Khare | The author is editor-in-chief of The Tribune

    In 2008, the two presidential gladiators forced the Americans to think about what the United States was all about; the Obama victory only aggravated the American society and its political divisions. The 2016 contest, too, will invite the Americans to reaffirm certain basic principles and commitments which for more than 200 years have sustained the American experiment — and, for which the world has admired and respected the United States……In the 2016 presidential contest, the world will see America’s rather un-pretty face. The reason is simple. Donald Trump has forced his way to the very top of the Republican presidential pile entirely on his own terms.  And, these terms were cheap, shoddy, vicious and racist”, says the author.


    Two days ago, the American presidential line-up got firmed up. Hillary Clinton clinched the Democratic Party’s nomination and will take on Donald Trump of the Republican Party. Just as in 2008 the Americans found themselves having to choose between two very different, almost starkly opposite candidates —Barack Obama, a black man, and John McCain, a Vietnam war veteran and very much a white man — they will now be called upon to decide between a woman with a record of steady legislative and administrative service and a maverick billionaire, who has not held any public office. The presidency is the first public job Donald Trump is applying for.

    In 2008, the two presidential gladiators forced the Americans to think about what the United States was all about; the Obama victory only aggravated the American society and its political divisions. The 2016 contest, too, will invite the Americans to reaffirm certain basic principles and commitments which for more than 200 years have sustained the American experiment — and, for which the world has admired and respected the United States.

    And, as the United States remains the world’s largest economy and also the world’s strongest power, the American presidential choices are a matter of interest — and, concern — to the rest of the world. The American presidency is a powerful office. And, just as he does at home, the President of the United States also makes more than a difference in the world. The American presidential contest may be a matter to be sorted out by the Americans themselves, but the world will have to live with the consequences of their choice. Arguably, that proposition has been valid since the end of the Second World War, but today America is a different place. As a nation, the Americans are definitely in an angry mood. They feel frustrated and cheated. The American political system seems to offer no corrective solutions to the excesses of capitalism and the consequent economic inequalities. Jarringly enough, these inequalities are only getting entrenched. The “mainstream” leadership, both of the Democratic and Republican varieties, is hopelessly beholden to the “Wall Street”, and, offers no intellectual solutions or even political slogans to address the Americans’ economic grievances.

    America is also in an ugly mood. Much of this ugliness can be traced to the relentless rise of the religious right. The Republican Party is virtually a religious party. It is in thrall to what Kevin Phillips calls the “Armageddon hucksters.” Post ‘9/11’, the Christian right feels righteously confirmed in its prejudices and bigotry by the rise of Islamic groups and their demonstrated ability to wield violence. Some kind of religious madness has seeped into the American soul. The religious right has so deeply polarized the American domestic political theatre and its actors that the United States is no longer able to project a comforting and comfortable liberal visage to the rest of the world.

    And, what is worse, America is in a mood to blame the rest of the world for its manifest decline. Every conservative ideologue easily subscribes to the totemic chant, “our country is in decline.” And, that is where the new Republican presidential standard-bearer steps in to tap the Americans’ fears about a world Washington no longer seems able to control. And, most fearful among the Americans is the white middle class, which feels squeezed in not just economically but also culturally and politically.

    It is an America that has come to resent — and resent deeply, unapologetically and righteously — its own President, not just because he is a black but because he is cerebral, has the benefit of a Harvard education, and is not given to shabby populism, and professes to be a reasonable man. This resentfulness has been incessantly fed and nurtured by the American religious right; and, the liberal voices and opinion-makers have had no answer to this creeping fashionable bigotry. And, this closing of the American mind would invite unpredictable responses from forces outside.

    In the 2016 presidential contest, the world will see America’s rather un-pretty face. The reason is simple. Donald Trump has forced his way to the very top of the Republican presidential pile entirely on his own terms. And, these terms were cheap, shoddy, vicious and racist. He did not care for the so-called “Republican establishment” and its gentrified protocols. He made no secret that he gave a damn about the liberals’ notions of “political correctness”, and he deliberately, provocatively massaged the white Americans’ dormant racial fears of the “outsider”. Above all, he is openly contemptuous of the global institutional arrangements and their obligations on the United States. Trump has sent every establishment economist in a tizzy with his aggressive advocacy of “economic nationalism”. But he has stayed with his message of protectionism and unilateralism. And, that is where the world will watch with considerable trepidation how the Americans sort the two candidates out during the campaign. Admittedly, between now and the first week of November, both Clinton and Trump would have ample opportunities to finesse their presidential personas. The prolonged ritual of campaigning carries with itself opportunities and pitfalls. Hillary Clinton is a familiar face and a tested name. She promises to stay firmly in the center of political reasonableness and public policy choices. But this is the first time the Americans would be called upon to decide whether they want a woman as their commander-in-chief. These last eight years of a black President have, paradoxically, made America a mixed-up, pixilated society, troubled by overt political correctness and plainly uncomfortable with liberal notions. For all her proven record of public service, Clinton is unpalatable to very many Americans. Just as Senator Bernie Sanders was able to instigate doubts among the Democrats about her baggage, Trump can be expected to be vicious and unrelenting in rattling skeletons in the Clinton cupboard. She will definitely need to reinforce the Americans’ trust in her competence and probity. A Clinton meltdown cannot be entirely ruled out.

    And, the same will hold equally true for Trump. Untempered as he has been with any public responsibility, Trump’s persona is cast in stone. Whereas Clinton promises to carry out more of the Obamaesque steadfastness, Trump will cater to the American impulse to punch difficult customers in the face. Above all, the Trump political insurgency has already emboldened all those leaders and groups around the world who believe in politics of national resentments, identity antagonism, demagoguery, and — personality cult. A right-wing fever is already claiming new victims in Europe. A Trump presidency would simply subvert the established world order and its accepted value system. The collective wisdom of the American people may be too feeble to stop that dangerous man. Considerable turmoil is in store for the global community.

  • President Obama endorses Hillary Clinton for President

    President Obama endorses Hillary Clinton for President

    WASHINGTON (TIP): US President Barack Obama formally endorsed Hillary Clinton’s White House bid on Thursday, June 9, and called for the Democratic Party to unite behind her after a protracted battle with Bernie Sanders for the party nomination.

    Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, said it “means the world” to her to have Obama’s support.

    “It is absolutely a joy and an honor that President Obama and I over the years have gone from fierce competitors to true friends,” Clinton told Reuters in an interview.

    Obama defeated Clinton in the 2008 Democratic primary and she went on to serve as secretary of state. Obama, who enjoys strong approval ratings after nearly eight years in office, will campaign with Clinton next week in Wisconsin, her campaign said.

    “I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office,” Obama said of Clinton in a video. “I’m with her. I am fired up, and I cannot wait to get out there and campaign for Hillary,” Obama said. Sanders, who met with Obama at the White House earlier on Thursday, said afterward he would work with Clinton to defeat Trump.

    In his endorsement video, the president took time to say that Sanders had run “an incredible campaign,” and that he had shone “a spotlight on issues like economic inequality and the outsized influence of money in our politics.”

    In fact, Obama said, those are messages the Democrats should embrace for the general election. And while Clinton and Sanders may have been rivals during the primary season, “they’re both patriots who love this country and they share a vision for the America that we all believe in.”

    “This has been a hard-fought race,” Obama said. “I know some say these primaries have somehow left the Democratic Party more divided: Well, they said that eight years ago, as well.”

    And just as Democrats’ victory in that election paved the way for significant national initiatives, Obama said he expects his party “won’t just win in November, we’ll build on the progress that we’ve made and we will win a brighter future for this country that we love.”

    Although the declarations of Clinton’s presumptive victory were based on her delegate haul, Sanders is not technically eliminated from the race because he could theoretically sway the Democrats unbound “super” delegates to his side. Still, that would be a tough sell for the senator: Clinton won more primary contests, more of the popular vote and more regular pledged delegates.

    The endorsement increases pressure on Sanders, a US senator from Vermont, to concede the race so the party can focus on campaigning against Donald Trump, the Republican presumptive nominee for the Nov. 8 election.

  • Hillary Clinton secures Democratic Presidential Nomination

    Hillary Clinton secures Democratic Presidential Nomination

    Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has secured the number of delegates necessary to be presumptive Democratic presidential nominee in the November elections, according to a count carried out by the NBC channel on Monday and as reported by the Associated Press.

    Becomes the first woman to top a major-party ticket in US

    After her victory over Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in Puerto Rico on Sunday and with the new support from superdelegates in recent days, Clinton has surpassed the 2,383 delegates needed as is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.

    It has been a long and bruising primary season for Hillary as she becomes the first woman to lead a major party in the race for the White House.

    The former first lady will almost certainly be proclaimed the Democratic party nominee at the July convention in Philadelphia, and will face the unofficial candidate for the Republican party Donald Trump in the elections.

    NBC’s count was released one day ahead of the last major primary elections in which Democrats in New Jersey, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, New Mexico and California, the most populous state in the country, will go to the polls on Tuesday.

    “According to the news, we are on the brink of a historic and unprecedented moment,” Clinton told her supporters.

    She said there were “primaries to win”, in reference to Tuesday’s primaries.

    Once named the party’s official candidate at the July convention, Clinton will become the first woman to enter the presidential race from one of the two major parties.

    NBC calculated that Clinton has 2,384 delegates, one above the minimum required, including 1,812 delegates won in the primaries and 572 superdelegates.

    Her rival, democratic socialist Bernie Sanders, has 1,566 delegates, 1,520 of them from the primaries and only 46 superdelegates, according to NBC.

  • House Speaker Paul Ryan Says He Will Vote for Donald Trump

    House Speaker Paul Ryan Says He Will Vote for Donald Trump

    WASHINGTON (TIP): Nearly a month after being named the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald Trump has finally earned the vote of House Speaker Paul Ryan.

    Far from a wholehearted embrace of his party’s 2016 standard-bearer’s policies and temperament, Ryan’s announcement on Thursday mainly emphasized that Trump would be a better ally to advance Ryan’s policy goals than likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

    The announcement, published in a column in his home town newspaper the GazetteXtra, failed to include the word “endorsement,” instead indicating only that the Wisconsin lawmaker will cast his vote for Trump at the ballot box. Ryan wrote that he came to his decision after several conversations with Trump.

    “I feel confident he would help us turn the ideas … into laws to help improve people’s lives,” he wrote.

    NBC News had proclaimed Trump the presumptive nominee 29 days ago on May 4, after Trump’s final GOP rivals exited the race. But Ryan withheld his support at the time, instead publicizing his concerns with the likely nominee.

    Ryan suggested then that it was up to Trump to unify the party after a primary that resulted in a nominee that many establishment Republicans did not prefer.

    “I think the bulk of the burden on unifying the party will have to come from our presumptive nominee,” Ryan said last month. “I’m not there right now. And I hope to though, and I want to. But I think what is required is that we unify this party.”

    In the column published Thursday, Ryan did not sugarcoat his continuing disagreements with Trump.

    “It’s no secret that he and I have our differences. I won’t pretend otherwise. And when I feel the need to, I’ll continue to speak my mind,” Ryan wrote. “To enact (Republican) ideas, we need a Republican president willing to sign them into law. That’s why, when he sealed the nomination, I could not offer my support for Donald Trump before discussing policies and basic principles.”

    While it’s hardly a glowing recommendation, Ryan’s willingness to support Trump presents yet another obstacle to the “Stop Trump” movement as establishment Republicans are slowly lining up behind their nominee, albeit reluctantly.

    Related: Donald Trump and Paul Ryan Could Not Be Further Apart

    A primary reason for that unification is Republicans’ common enemy in Hillary Clinton, a fact not lost on Ryan in his announcement Thursday.

    “One person who we know won’t support it is Hillary Clinton. A Clinton White House would mean four more years of liberal cronyism and a government more out for itself than the people it serves. Quite simply, she represents all that our agenda aims to fix,” Ryan wrote.

    Ryan was slow to the Trump train after expressing concerns over some of Trump’s comments and positions. The two met twice in May, after Trump was deemed the presumptive nominee, but an endorsement wasn’t immediate after the meetings.

    Trump said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on May 8 that he was “blindsided” by Ryan’s lack of an endorsement.

    “But (I) have a nice relationship with him. And then all of a sudden, he gets on and he does this number. So I’m not exactly sure what he has in mind. But that’s okay,” Trump added.

    In Ryan’s column Thursday, he said Trump can “help us” move forward on their policy domestic and foreign policy priories.

    “As I said from the start, my goal has been to unite the party so we can win in the fall. And if we’re going to unite, it has to be over ideas,” Ryan said, seeming to get behind him for the sake of the party and not his satisfaction with the person.

  • Trump temperamentally unfit to hold President’s office: #HillaryClinton

    Trump temperamentally unfit to hold President’s office: #HillaryClinton

    SAN DIEGO, CA (TIP): In one of the most striking speeches of her political career, Hillary Clinton dispensed with the sober diplo-speak that has characterized her previous national security addresses and went straight for the jugular, unleashing a series of biting attacks on Trump.

    In the spirit of President Lyndon Johnson’s notorious “Daisy” nuclear blast ad targeting Barry Goldwater’s temperament in 1964, Clinton warned that Trump should not be let anywhere near the nuclear codes because he could start a war when somebody “got under his very thin skin.”

    “He’s not just unprepared — he’s temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility,” Clinton said during the speech in San Diego, California, days before Tuesday’s primary in the Golden State effectively concludes the primary season and confirms her as the presumptive Democratic nominee over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

    Trump fired back while speaking at a rally in San Jose, California, Thursday night.

    “I watched Hillary today and it was pathetic. It was so sad to watch,” Trump said, calling it a “political speech” that had nothing to do with foreign policy.

    “It was a pretty pathetic deal,” he added.

    The speech marked a significant moment in Clinton’s campaign, as it was the first real signal of the tactics and attitude she will use to take on Trump and offered a preview of what are likely to be fierce clashes between the rivals at a trio of presidential debates later in the year. It demonstrated the kind of sardonic, unrestrained humor that she often shows in private interactions with friends and reporters but has refrained from displaying in public.

    It also appeared to be aimed at Democrats who are spooked by recent polls showing a tight race between Clinton and Trump, and who fear her often-criticized campaigning skills won’t keep up with Trump’s volatile and highly effective off-the-cuff style.

    And when she argued that Trump’s lack of knowledge on foreign policy and temperament would put at risk decades of Republican and Democratic foreign policy advances, she appeared to be making a pitch for disgruntled national security conservatives who feel unable to put their trust in the Republican nominee.

    Yet the strategy has its risks, as pretty much all of Trump’s GOP primary rivals who tried to take on Trump couldn’t survive his return fire. The question is whether Clinton will be more effective. She might be helped by not waiting until the last minute like the Republicans did — seeking to define Trump early in the minds of the general election audience.

    She attempted to convince voters that Trump’s ideas are a mix of “bizarre rants, personal feuds and outright lies.” She lambasted his “bragging” approach to foreign policy based on a string of “nasty tweets” and accused him of harboring a “bizarre” affinity for authoritarian leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Communist rulers of China and North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un.

    “We cannot put the safety of our children and grandchildren in Donald Trump’s hands. We cannot let him roll the dice with America,” Clinton said.

    At one point, Clinton imagined Trump composing nasty tweets to respond to her speech. And the combative Republican standard-bearer did not disappoint.

    “Bad performance by Crooked Hillary Clinton! Reading poorly from the teleprompter! She doesn’t even look presidential!” the presumptive GOP nominee wrote as her address ended.

    In another tweet, Trump added: “Crooked Hillary no longer has credibility – too much failure in office. People will not allow another four years of incompetence!”

    But taking a page from Trump’s book, Clinton’s speech contained a string of zingers meant to ridicule the presumptive presidential GOP nominee and render him an unacceptable choice for president.

    “He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia,” Clinton said. “The stakes in global statecraft are infinitely higher and more complex than in the world of luxury hotels.”

    She added: “I will leave it to the psychiatrists to explain his attraction to tyrants” before taking aim at Trump’s claim that being a global business tycoon equips him with significant global knowledge.

    “You know, there’s no risk of people losing their lives if you blow up a golf-course deal,” she said. “But it doesn’t work like that in world affairs.”

    “He also says, ‘I know more about ISIS than the generals do, believe me.’ You know what? I don’t believe him,” Clinton said, drawing cheers from her partisan audience of around 250 people.

    Aides said that Clinton never intended the speech to be a formal foreign policy address but rather to deliver a stinging rebuke of Trump. After watching and reading Trump speeches carefully, Clinton gave an outline of what she wanted to say at the beginning of last week, and speechwriters Megan Rooney and Dan Schwerin worked with foreign policy advisers Jake Sullivan and Laura Rosenberger on the first draft, two campaign aides told CNN.

    For the last few days, they’ve been going back and forth with Clinton to streamline it. Originally, there was more of her own foreign policy, but it was sharpened over last week to include far more Trump.

    She spent her coast-to-coast plane ride Wednesday revising the speech with Rooney. Clinton kept working on the specific language right up right before the speech, and a story about Navy SEALs protecting civilians during the 2011 operation that killed Osama bin Laden was a final addition.

    In terms of policy, much of what she talked about — including her views on NATO, trade and Russia — has already been rolled out in previous, more conventional foreign policy speeches.

    But she did focus on the more controversial aspects of the foreign policy that he has laid out.

    “This is a man who said that more countries should have nuclear weapons, including Saudi Arabia. This is someone who has threatened to abandon our allies in NATO, the countries that work with us to root out terrorists abroad before they strike us at home,” Clinton said.

    “He believes we can treat the U.S. economy like one of his casinos and default on our debts to the rest of the world, which would cause an economic catastrophe far worse than anything we experienced in 2008,” she continued. “He has said that he would order our military to carry out torture.”

    Clinton’s speech laid out the parameters for what is likely to be a furious foreign policy debate in the general election. It is a feud that will allow her to take aim at Trump’s alleged inexperience and lack of knowledge but will also require her to defend what Republicans see as deep vulnerabilities in her own foreign policy record.

    Those liabilities include the aftermath of the NATO intervention in Libya, in which she played a dominant role and which left behind a dangerous failed state and a terror haven, as well as the Obama administration’s “reset” of relations with Russia, which critics say was naïve and ineffective.

    Clinton must also confront accusations that she negligently put American national security at risk by using a personal email server for her official business when she served as secretary of state.

    Trump has already made his own attempt to obliterate Clinton’s foreign policy credentials.

    “She doesn’t have the temperament to be president. She’s got bad judgment. She’s got horribly bad judgment,” Trump said last week. “If you look at the war in Iraq, if you look at what she did with Libya, which was a total catastrophe.”

    The likely Democratic nominee closed out her speech with a preview of how she will respond to such attacks — by turning the heat back on Trump and his perceived lack of qualifications to be president.

    “Imagine Donald Trump sitting in the Situation Room, making life-or-death decisions on behalf of the United States. Imagine him deciding whether to send your spouses or children into battle. Imagine if he had not just his Twitter account at his disposal when he’s angry, but America’s entire arsenal,” she said.

    “Do we want him making those calls — someone thin-skinned and quick to anger, who lashes out at the smallest criticism?” she asked rhetorically. “Do we want his finger anywhere near the button?”

    (Source: CNN)