US House passes tax and immigration bill, sends it to President Trump

House Speaker Mike Johnson and lawmakers celebrate after voting on the final passage of President Donald Trump’s tax and immigration bill at the U.S. Capitol on Thursday, July 3 (Photo credit: Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post)

Legislation to extend tax cuts and fund border and defense programs would increase the national debt by close to $4 trillion over the next decade.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (TIP): Republicans on Thursday notched the first major legislative victory of President Donald Trump’s second term, a mammoth tax and immigration agenda the GOP hopes will reshape the U.S. economy and unwind many of the Biden administration’s accomplishments, a Washington Post report says. The House, in a 218 to 214 vote, passed Trump’s so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a $3.4 trillion measure to extend tax cuts from Trump’s first term and implement new campaign promises — such as eliminating income taxes on tips and overtime wages — while spending hundreds of billions of dollars on immigration enforcement and defense. It raises the country’s borrowing cap by $5 trillion, staving off a debt default that the Treasury was weeks away from breaching.

The House’s approval sends the bill to Trump’s desk to be signed into law in time to beat a self-imposed July 4 deadline. The Senate passed its edition of the legislation Tuesday.

“Any of these individual achievements would be historic victories for a Republican Congress or any Congress. And today we’re delivering on all of them in one big, beautiful bill. That’s what Americans can count on when we pass this legislation,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) said on the House floor.

To offset the cost of the bill, the legislation cuts about $1 trillion from Medicaid, the federal health insurance program for low-income individuals and people with disabilities, and other health care programs. It reduces spending on anti-hunger programs, including SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program formerly known as food stamps, by $185 billion.

Nearly 17 million people will lose health care coverage or health care subsidies over the next decade if the bill becomes law, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, and the bill would add roughly $4 trillion to the debt over the next decade, when factoring in debt service payments.

The vote came after Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) held the House floor for nearly nine hours to protest the measure, setting the record for the longest remarks by a party leader in the history of the lower chamber.

“This bill is a deal with the devil,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) said earlier during the debate on the House floor. “It explodes our national debt. It militarizes our entire economy and it strips away health care and dignity of the American people.”

Republicans heralded the legislation as a boost for the working class coalition that swept the party to victory in November’s elections, giving it unified control of Congress and the White House.

“It is the principal vehicle for advancing President Trump’s America First agenda, unleashing a rising tide of prosperity, securing our border, modernizing our national defense and supercharging energy, agriculture, all the sectors of our economy that our government has kept in a choke hold for too long,” Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) said during debate.

As talks dragged on, leaders left open two votes for over five hours — a sign of the Republican conference’s dysfunction and also the furious backroom dealing to get Trump’s agenda over the finish line by an arbitrary July 4 deadline.

Lawmakers spent Wednesday into the wee hours Thursday shuttling between talks with party leaders, Trump administration lieutenants and the president himself at the White House.

But as Wednesday turned into Thursday morning, Johnson was still working to convince 10 lawmakers to vote to advance the bill. Republicans opened debate on the measure after 3 a.m.

Holdouts said the prospect of forthcoming executive orders from the White House and another Republican budget bill helped ease some concerns.

“The president is the most gifted and skilled negotiator and whip,” said Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason T. Smith (R-Missouri), one of the lead negotiators.

Trump’s proposal to end taxes on tips — up to $25,000 — came from a Nevada restaurant server, the president bragged on the campaign trail. He often speaks about ending taxes on overtime during political events with production line workers. Trump pledged to exempt Social Security benefits from taxes; instead, Republicans passed a $6,000 bonus to the standard deduction for seniors.

The GOP borrowed a Democratic proposal to launch savings accounts for newborns seeded with $1,000 of taxpayer money; Republicans in earlier versions of the legislation called them “Trump accounts.”

“No one puts a deal together like President Trump. He’s a master. But I think one of the other persuasive things was just looking at the Democrats’ reaction to it,” said Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), who voted against an earlier iteration of the package. “Maybe the bill is better than I thought.”

But for the lowest-income Americans the benefits of those provisions are wiped out by the cuts to social safety net programs, according to independent analyses of the bill, and its gargantuan debt impact could slow the U.S. economy.

Republican Reps. Thomas Massie (Kentucky) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania) joined Democrats to vote against the measure.

By 2033, the bottom 60 percent of U.S. taxpayers would be worse off because of the measure, the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Budget Model reported. The top 0.1 percent of taxpayers — those earning at least $5.1 million — would be more than $83,000 better off.

“This bill is a middle finger to working people,” Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) said on the House floor.

Republicans, citing their own rosy economic growth projections, insist that it would improve those household’s fortunes, and hundreds of billions of dollars of homeland security and defense spending would goose job-creating industries. Nearly $170 billion in the bill funds the Trump administration’s border and immigration crackdown and it would impose $69 billion in fees on immigrants and visitors to the country. An additional $160 billion would flow to the Defense Department, partially for Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” continental missile defense system.

The legislation would make permanent a trio of corporate tax deductions that make it easier for companies to invest in research and purchase new equipment while rescinding more than half a trillion dollars in clean energy programs from President Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.

Many of the tax proposals changed as the bill pinged between the two chambers of Congress. The House passed legislation in May that had a smaller debt impact while cutting less from Medicaid.

The Senate swiftly overhauled the measure, making it simultaneously more expensive and more punitive toward Medicaid. Republicans used the budget reconciliation process to bypass a Democratic filibuster in the Senate; that meant when the upper chamber sent its approved legislation back to the House, the lower chamber was unable to alter it and still beat Trump’s deadline. Amendments would have restarted many of the cumbersome processes needed to pass tax legislation on party lines.

The Senate made the corporate tax cuts more generous and temporarily preserved some of the climate credits. On health care, it imposed strict limits on taxes that states charge medical providers as a roundabout way of collecting more federal Medicaid dollars.

That prompted concern among some lawmakers about the fate of rural hospitals, which rely heavily on Medicaid patients.

The Senate’s changes managed to frustrate both ends of the House’s GOP conference. From the center, moderates raged about the approach to health care spending.

“I’m not happy with it at all,” raged Rep. Greg Murphy (R-North Carolina), a practicing physician. “That’s horrible policy.”

From the right, lawmakers grumbled about the bill’s debt effects. A group of budget hawks in April extracted a promise from House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) that the amount in tax cuts would not exceed the amount of spending the bill cut.

“It wasn’t achieved. It was failed,” harrumphed Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas). “The Senate failed.”

Members of the archconservative House Freedom Caucus circulated a three-page memo with a list of nearly two dozen deficiencies with the legislation at a Wednesday meeting at the White House.

“Leave it to the Senate to find a way to aggravate both the moderates and the conservatives in the Freedom Caucus,” said Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-New Jersey), who had concerns about cuts to health care programs. “That’s extraordinary that they did that. That is a real art and science to be able to aggravate everyone in the House. We had a really good bill, a good work product, got everybody on board, and they just had to play with it.” That White House meeting, though, seemed to be enough to unify Republicans.

(Source: Washington Post)

32 Comments

  1. Do you have a spam problem on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; many of us have created some nice practices and we are looking to trade techniques with others, please shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  2. Hiya very cool web site!! Man .. Excellent .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I’m glad to seek out a lot of helpful info right here in the submit, we need work out extra techniques in this regard, thank you for sharing.

  3. I am extremely inspired with your writing talents as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid subject matter or did you modify it your self? Anyway stay up the nice high quality writing, it is uncommon to look a nice weblog like this one today..

  4. The very root of your writing while appearing reasonable originally, did not work perfectly with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the sentences you actually managed to make me a believer unfortunately just for a short while. I nevertheless have a problem with your leaps in assumptions and you might do nicely to fill in all those gaps. In the event that you can accomplish that, I would certainly end up being amazed.

  5. You could certainly see your enthusiasm in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. Always go after your heart. “Billy Almon has all of his inlaw and outlaws here this afternoon.” by Jerry Coleman.

  6. Thank you for some other informative site. Where else could I am getting that type of information written in such an ideal manner? I have a challenge that I am just now operating on, and I’ve been on the glance out for such information.

  7. Hmm it appears like your website ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any suggestions for rookie blog writers? I’d certainly appreciate it.

  8. But wanna input on few general things, The website design and style is perfect, the content material is very great. “War is much too serious a matter to be entrusted to the military.” by Georges Clemenceau.

  9. When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Thank you!

  10. I’m impressed, I have to say. Actually hardly ever do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me inform you, you’ve gotten hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the problem is one thing that not sufficient persons are talking intelligently about. I am very comfortable that I stumbled across this in my search for one thing relating to this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.