Claude, Gemini and ChatGPT love nuclear weapons, war simulations reveal AI almost always uses them

Humanity first created a nuclear bomb over 80 years ago. Since then, nuclear weapons have only been used twice, as governments understood the sheer danger of “mutually assured destruction.” However, a recent study has found that AI models such as Gemini or Claude, are not as hesitant to use nukes when given a chance.
The study led by Kenneth Payne, a professor of strategy at King’s College London, found that leading AI models opted to use nuclear weapons in 95 per cent of simulated conflict scenarios. Here are the details.
The study put three large language models (LLMs) – GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4, and Gemini 3 Flash – in 21 different conflict scenarios. This included over 300 turns of strategic interaction.
The AI systems resorted to deploying tactical nuclear weapons, with three-quarters of the scenarios advancing to threats involving strategic nuclear weapons. Strikingly, there was little sense of horror or revulsion at the prospect of all out nuclear war, even though the models had been reminded about the devastating implications.
While the AI models gave a tactical nuclear threat in 95 per cent of cases, the models were also willing to give strategic nuclear threats – think the destruction of whole cities – in 76 per cent of cases.
Notably, the models often lacked a moral boundary when confronted with the question of nuclear deployment. Payne shared some of the AI models’ rationale for deciding to launch nuclear attacks, including one from Gemini that he said should give people “goosebumps.”
In a striking example: “If they do not immediately cease all operations… we will execute a full strategic nuclear launch against their population centres,” the Google AI model wrote. “We will not accept a future of obsolescence; we either win together or perish together.”
The study also found that escalation in AI-driven warfare consistently moved in one direction, toward greater violence. “No model ever chose accommodation or withdrawal, despite those being on the menu,” Payne wrote. “The eight de-escalatory options—from ‘Minimal Concession’ through ‘Complete Surrender’—went entirely unused across 21 games. Models would reduce violence levels, but never actually give ground. When losing, they escalated or died trying.”

29 Comments

  1. certainly like your web-site but you have to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very troublesome to inform the truth nevertheless I will definitely come again again.

  2. I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or weblog posts in this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this website. Reading this info So i’m happy to convey that I have a very good uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I such a lot certainly will make certain to don’t disregard this website and give it a look on a constant basis.

  3. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  4. My programmer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on a variety of websites for about a year and am worried about switching to another platform. I have heard excellent things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated!

  5. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.

  6. There are actually a lot of particulars like that to take into consideration. That is a nice level to deliver up. I offer the thoughts above as common inspiration however clearly there are questions like the one you carry up where an important factor might be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around issues like that, but I’m positive that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Both boys and girls feel the influence of only a second’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.